brainrot is real guys...
RMH
Fai_Ryy
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

oozey mess
Sweet Seals For You, Always
noise dept.
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Cosmic Funnies

Love Begins
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

if i look back, i am lost

⁂

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Stranger Things
h
Peter Solarz
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Xuebing Du
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Taiwan
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from Canada

seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Philippines
seen from United States
@fairandfatalasfair
brainrot is real guys...

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
sighs.................... late to the fandom
when you thought you could fix him, and then your boyfriends bombs a church. Unfortunately, that leaves only one way to fix this
@barbex <3
You ever think about how instantaneously Edwin makes friends? Like, he makes a friend on average once every 75 years or so, but when he does it’s on the spot.
Charles immediately wants to be situationships with Crystal but tbh them being actual friends takes a lot longer. He seems to kinda want to be friends with Brad and Hunter but he barely even gets to the point of “kinda amicable” before shit goes down. With Niko, he clearly likes her immediately but they seem to exchange about five sentences total.
Like, Charles is friendly instantly but him being actual friends takes a lot longer, which given his history is of course super fair.
But Edwin! With Niko and Charles both, it’s on sight, it’s “I just met you and I love you, BFFs 5ever!”
And you may be thinking “nah, Charles was the one who said you’re stuck with me,” and that is true, because Charles is the one who parlays connection into physical attachment. But Edwin is the one who declares them friends! “I sincerely wish we could have been friends for longer”!!!
My boy has very high standards but by the Endless when he sees someone who meets them he does not waste even an hour.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The most interesting question you can ask about any character is not what do they want. it's what do they believe they deserve. because those two things are almost never the same and the gap between them is where your entire story lives. a person can want love completely and believe they don't deserve it and that belief will destroy every good thing that comes toward them in ways they won't even notice they're doing. write the gap. the gap is the character.
What if Edwin's confession DID change things between them? Charles is happy to carry on how they always have, but Edwin, despite his words can't act like he's not in love with his best friend. He can't pretend that nothing has changed. Unfortunately this results in a fight, because Charles doesn't see why things should change for something he didn't do, or have a say in.
#Just writing out my angst notes from work#Don't worry these two will sort it out eventually#They just have opposing opinions on this for the moment#Charles is plenty happy and fine that Edwin is in love with him but just wants to keep things the same#Edwin had this grand revelation about himself and his feelings for his favourite person#Despite disliking change he thinks it deserves more attention and impact on their afterlives#It feels like his feelings are being swept aside or ignored even if that's not Charles' intention
CHARLES ROWLAND & EDWIN PAYNE + reflections Dead Boy Detectives (2024) — Season 1, Episode 7
#okay#first of all#it will never not kill me (heh) that this is the first time they've seen their reflections in decades#and they're in fucking hell#but also#I would like to point out that the way Edwin flinches in the last gif#is specifically in a way that would make it easier for him to get up and start running#like he starts out on his knees#and he could have fallen back onto his butt and scooted away#but no#he goes just far enough to get his leg out from under him#his foot and his hand both go to the ground so he can push himself up#this boy is always primed to run but especially in hell#I love this show a normal amount (lies) (brilliant heartbreaking tags via @remyjay17)
Don’t overlook paternity leave because it’s a hugely important feminist issue
Celebrating fatherhood with official paternity leave policies challenges traditional gender roles and empowers parents in the workplace. It’s one of those rare issues where men’s rights activists and feminists can find common ground with a mutually beneficial cause. It even has an impact on LGBTQ equality.
Follow @this-is-life-actually
I’ve reblogged a lot of posts today about why paid paternity leave (or just in general all parents regardless of gender being entitled to the same amount of paid parental leave) is such an important social issue, and these posts have made a lot of great points about why gender equality in parental leave is such a massively important issue for equality, such as:
- It’s important for LGBT+ parents who don’t fit the cis-hetero mold of one mother and one father.
- It’s an important feminist issue for reducing the second shift: when only one parent gets adequate parental leave, it’s only natural for a pattern to develop that the only parent who got adequate parental leave takes on the lion’s share of childcare. However, if both parents get adequate parental leave, then it’s more likely for a pattern to develop of sharing childcare duties. This is obviously massively important for reducing how much women’s careers are affected by having children.
- If the mother has post-partum health issues (anything from recovering from a C-section or other physical traumas, to post-partum depression and/or anxiety) it’s incredibly unfair to expect her partner to just go back to work immediately instead of allowing her partner to stay home and help with childcare duties. When someone is recovering from having a baby, it can be really important for their partner to stay home to help care for them and the baby.
However, one important point I haven’t seen brought up in why equal paid parental is so important for social equality is how important it is for reducing hiring discrimination.
By that I mean, when a country has *only* guaranteed maternity leave, but either no paternity leave (or really short paternity leave of a few weeks like the U.K. has), this is only going to raise the risk of hiring discrimination against women.
So if a company is choosing between two candidates for a position: one is a young woman and the other is a young man, if the country this company is in has a maternity leave policy of several months or more, but paternity leave is either just a few weeks (or completely non-existent), the company will look at the woman as riskier and less reliable to hire than the man.
So equal paid parental leave leads to more equality in the job market, because it means companies are less likely to see women as riskier and less reliable to hire. If everyone, not just women, has the same length of parental leave, everyone runs the same risk of needing to go on leave for the same amount of time.
There’s no reason not to demand that all parents regardless of gender receive equal paid parental leave. All parents and all children benefit from it.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Hot take that I'm very open to disagreement on: Charles doesn't care nearly as much about Morality as Edwin does. Charles cares about protecting vulnerable people, primarily (though not necessarily exclusively) His People, which often ends up at the same place as a Code of Ethics, but isn't, ultimately, the same thing. He worries about being Bad, on occasion, but his primary drive isn't to be Good. It's to make sure people he connects to are safe and with him.
Even with his death-incident, he doesn't say "someone was being hurt, I had to stop them". He lays out an explanation of why this particular person sparked a connection in him, and made him want to protect them specifically, when, the implication is, he has not necessarily protected other victims of his 'friends' in the past.
With Crystal, there's a certain part of him that's being naturally protective when he invites her home, but it seems to be sparked on her specifically because he's drawn to her - this is very explicitly (as stated by Edwin) not a service he normally offers to clients, though ghosts are presumably often homeless.
With Becky Aspen, he leans on "you wouldn't let a little American girl get hurt" to convince Edwin, because he knows Edwin will cave to that argument. But it doesn't seem to be his primary motivation (even though he absolutely is down to lay down his afterlife for her once she's been categorized as His To Protect).
With the Devlins - and I think this is the strongest evidence, here, because it's what Charles himself is using to prove to himself he isn't Good - he wants to protect the victims, sure. He is protective. His protectiveness towards them goes way up after they get directly connected to his own trauma, though... and his eventual attack isn't righteous protection, it's pure trauma-fuelled anger. He doesn't throw himself in front of the axe to protect the girls, or try to take it, let alone do anything actually helpful like work with Edwin and Crystal. He attacks because he's pissed.
I want to say very clearly that I mean none of this as an insult to Charles, I love him dearly, and also, again, I'm offering this as one possible interpretation, not as Absolute Fact. But I think it's a viable and interesting interpretation!
(Also super open to "Edwin's not Moral either, he's just combining 'support my case with Hell' with 'my equivalent of protecting people I connect to/see myself in is being kind to people I connect to/see myself in' with 'I intellectually enjoy solving cases and am a conscientious worker'. Which I think is also an extremely viable interpretation! Ultimately both of them would kill an unarmed transdimensional being person without hesitation if it was for the sake of Their People and I love that about them.)
being mutuals isn’t enough we need to eat breakfast in the garden together
Harpy Hare, where have you buried all your children?
You can't keep them all caged
They will fight and run away
Mother, tell me, so I say
Can we please bring back buttons PLEASE can we bring back buttons BUTTONS PLEASE for the love of god BUTTONS THAT YOU PRESS DOWN AND CAN FEEL IT BEING PRESSED buttons please buttons can we bring them back can we PLEASE can we please bring back the buttons
Strange racists and homophobes on the internet seem to have access to an alternate way cooler version of TV than me. "every white character on TV is in an interracial relationship" "every show has a gay couple in it" "main characters keep having to secretly be bisexual and nonbinary" "every show has gratuitous full frontal nudity" like damn promise?? What channel???
as a black gay person real like where y'all be finding this stuff pass the name
for real though, those DO NOT WATCH OR YOU'LL CORRUPT YOUR CHILDREN lists put out by conservative christian family groups is where I find all the stellar tv shows. Like, shit I didn't know half of those existed, thanks for finding them for me, gonna go watch 30 hours of gay tv now!
I think I know how this works.
For personal context, before I went to the '98 Burning Man festival, one of the things I'd read from a couple different journalists was that "everybody" runs around naked. Which, fine by me, I'd already spent a lot of time in clothing-optional spaces, I'm not fanatic about it but it's nice.
So I got there early and set up a public shade structure on one of Black Rock City's main roads and spent most of each afternoon just watching the crowds go by. I don't remember seeing more than one actually naked person the whole week. I think a topless woman passed by my intersection maybe every half an hour, sometimes once an hour. So why in the hell were people, normally pretty smart and observant writers, coming away with the impression that everybody was naked?
Then I remembered an unrelated passage from Joel Garreau's great book about the history of the outer-ring suburbs, Edge City. Mall developers told him flat-out that they tried to keep the crowds in their malls less than 5% black. Not because they themselves were racist, but because they had determined, experimentally, that if more than 5% of the people in the mall are black, the median white shopper will wrongly describe the mall as at least half black, as mostly black. And not a few of them would describe it, at 6% black, as a mall where "only black people go." Why?
Because, emotionally, they were still upset over the last one when the next one came into view.
Same as the journalists describing Black Rock City as all naked. Same as the right-wing religious culture warriors describing television as entirely mixed-race and gender non-conforming. Not because it's even vaguely true, we know that, but because they haven't gotten over their discomfort over the last one by the time the next one comes along. The anger, not the stimulus, is the part that's continuous, so their mind lies to them that it's "all" the thing they can't get over.
Similar effect for the presence/proportion of women in things, by the way: https://health.howstuffworks.com/mental-health/human-nature/perception/how-17-equals-496-the-amazing-multiplying-women.htm

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Is anyone else constantly bothered by the fact that all of a child's medical care is required to go through their parents? That they must rely on these people to decide when they do or don't need medical care?
No matter how injured. If a parent doesn't deem it necessary to see a doctor, it doesn't happen. Teachers can suggest a doctor visit, but unless it's a very acute injury (and even then), it's ultimately up to the parents.
You can be 13. Twisted, maybe broken ankle. You teacher lets you sit out in PE. She's concerned, and tells you to rest when you go home, and see a doctor. You get home, ur parents fill a bath and add some Epsom salts, and then laugh at you for using it moms old colorguard stick as a cane. Take some ibuprofen they say. It's just a little sprain, ur a kid.
You go to school the next day, go to ur office assistant time. Office calls ur mom to come get you, because you're clearly in too much pain for school. Your mom laughs when she gets you, says you just were so determined not to miss school. Scolds you for making the office ladies worry.
You never see a doctor for the injury.
Your parents come into the exam room at every visit. This does not stop with age, except for gynecologist. But your parents are on the medical release forms. They fill them out for you, with you. You do not get to take them off.
You never get to tell s doctor about the ankle. Even though it never quote healed right, and it hurts every day.
Then your 18. In college. Still on your parents insurance, and have no car. The on campus clinic only does std testing. You fall down some stairs. Same injury. You call your parents, crying from the pain. You are using a mop as a cane. They console you and say to have a bath, take some meds, and let them know how it feels in a few days. You end up borrowing your roommates rolling chair to get around for the weekend.
By Monday, you can walk again. You walk miles to class every day. You ask to see a doctor, but your parents won't drive the hour to come take you, and you don't have the insurance card. You are still at their mercy for medical care. The ankle tries to heal again. This time worse than before. The tendons click with every step.
Now you're in your twenties. Finally have your own healthcare. You see a doctor. You get to mention the ankle! They say it's been too long to really even know what was damaged. That you have arthritis now. It healed wrong but it can no longer be fixed.
I'm 32 now. My ankle tells me the weather. I wear boots to keep it stable. What could have been a funny story about a fall and a cast has become a lifetime injury. Because children do not have access to medical care without a parents approval.
Ink and watercolour art inspired by the absolutely amazing Dead Boy Detectives fic The Song of Rowland by @mirrorleaf and @promethia-tenk.