Hey an epstein email where the author is clearly fetishizing trans women is not actually an example of "transandrophobia" it's transmisogyny. its transphobic as fuck overall but it has fucking nothing to do with "transmisandry" goddddddddddd im so tired.
you are so so so so so so fucking stupid.
ok now that my initial anger has subsided.
Robert Trivers is apparently some harvard dipshit.
Like, I'm not sure of the context of this email reply, not sure WHY trivers is saying this to epstein. but the whole email is talking about trans women's value as sex objects, talking about how they are all 'using sex work to pay for hrt', how most of them are "sexually happy" and how he personally finds them very attractive. He very obviously is a chaser who fetishizes trans women in a very disgusting old ass harvard pervert man way. it's very "I look at trans people as subhuman organisms, the same way a dog breeder might look at their dogs, or a cattle farmer their cows"
And yes, trivers talks about trans men being "unhappy and lonely" "men with pum pums, the worst of both worlds" which is transphobic nonsense, but has NOTHING to do with them being men! It is their transness that causes him to say these things! He specifically says "you want men to have penises" like! One of the pieces of 'evidence' he cites is how he personally has seen hundreds of porn videos of trans women, but never seen a trans man in porn. How do we get it through everyones head that this is not an example of transfemme 'privilege' or whatever the fuck
literally what i was thinking. also the way the guy is like “i WOULD tag this post with transfeminism, but all the mean man hating feminazis in there hate me because i’m sexist” in the tags is sending me





















