Untitled

We are now under the impression that Cloakers/Inventory hasn't wiped his tumblr but kept it under the radar for some reason.

The way we've figured it out was due to him supposedly liking a post from an artist that he had as a profile on his discord and currently has.

While I couldn't stop the co-owner from sending out those anons, it's still shitty of you to continue mocking at someone who went through a breakdown. You're still further insisting were enablers despite what has came out about you now.

But of course, he'd used this to try to seep his way back into the OCT community by commissioning an artist who is aware of his actions.

After this person blocked him, they would alert us to this sighting. And within the night, Cloakers/Inventory would wipe this account once he realized they blocked him.

His current Discord bio is now stating that he wants to "improve" himself. Yet, he ran from his actions by jumping onto a new Discord account and hiding under a new alias to try to get back at the community.

The reason why people "got invested" was because you hijacked our situation and made it about yourself. You don't have any evidence on hand with you at all, only claims and nothing else.

We kindly ask you to never use or mutter the words "Cloakers/Inventory" for your smear campaign.

Last night, the co-owner had come onto the burner that later on turned into a heated feud with Majomaru, and to my surprise, has added fuel to the fire by snapping at her. From my knowledge, they fell into a nervous breakdown that night and went off without thinking for a minute.

I get their frustration about us being denied any proof whatsoever, but I believe they added more harm than good by handling stress like this. And to my investigation, Majo was never indirectly involved with Cloakers/Inventory at all, she just made claims and never provided proof. I understand that you don't have to give us every single piece of evidence you've accused this person of, but that doesn't mean you refuse to give out specific evidence to a specific claim. Thus, we do not want defamation on this burner that was supposed to call out an actual child predator.

As a result of this whole ordeal, I have taken down the inappropriate posts and have since barred the co-owner from handling the accounts other than modifying the document. They have stated that they will move on as they can. I apologize for this late response, I was asleep when this breakdown happened.

Please don't let what happened be the major focus of what we are. We originally made this burner to continue spreading out awareness on a predator who caused real harm to a community.

For starters, I had no idea there was potential claims of abuse under this blog until the owner logged back in. When I first heard the message of alleged abuse including adding a statement of that person not caring at all about my groomer for about a year on that server left me in pure distress.

I was questioning on who this accuser was and her claims alI went back to last year, yet, I felt frantic and acted on impulse to cut off the person who was being accused. Let this be known, I had nothing to do with the recent activity this blog has been receiving.

When the owner (who created the doc) confronted her, I was informed that she outright denied us any specific evidence of what she claimed happened and blocked them. Not even after they assured them saying they weren't going to pick any sides yet. This information alone has caused me more stress than ever.

Earlier, I was sent a message regarding Majo with a document attached, now, I was still concerned and confused over both parties now claiming abuse. With situations like this alone, I can't seem to understand who is in the wrong here and it's messing me up more than it already is.

I sadly can't contact Majo since we've been cut off. So I can't really say who is the actual abuser here. Again, I'm very confused and stressed about this happening. If the allegations against the accused are false, please don't use my trauma just to get back at someone. If it's true, then I don't know what to say but we apologize if the owner sounded hostile to you.

It has come to our attention that there are claims of abuse that was reblogged by a user. We want to say that we are not involved in any of this.

When we confronted this individual for evidence, we were met with hostility and an eventual block despite our intentions.

Please, next time, don't try and make accusations and shut us out when people are reblogging your claims and not giving us evidence when confronted.

Read more is to the person who made the accusation.