Truly a shame there's not more yak appreciation on tumblr.
d e v o n

izzy's playlists!
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

tumblr dot com
Game of Thrones Daily
Cosimo Galluzzi
sheepfilms
🪼
wallacepolsom
i don't do bad sauce passes
Peter Solarz
Mike Driver

Kaledo Art

pixel skylines

titsay
dirt enthusiast
$LAYYYTER
RMH
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Colombia

seen from France

seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Denmark

seen from Malaysia

seen from Italy
seen from France
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Colombia
seen from Spain

seen from France
seen from Israel
@deafmangoes
Truly a shame there's not more yak appreciation on tumblr.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Sick list of symptoms bro. Now try humanizing your behavior instead of pathologizing it.
Pathologizing: Hey sorry I yelled at you. I have this ADHD symptom called RSD that makes me really sensitive.
Humanizing: Hey, I’m sorry that I blew up like that earlier. In the moment I felt really attacked and overwhelmed and I reacted badly, but I know you didn’t mean to offend me with what you said, so that behavior is on me.
Because I just saw a post bitching about this one, I want to add: this post is saying that you need to take accountability for the way you hurt other people, even if it happens because of a symptom of your disability/illness. It's also saying that using terms (especially acronyms) that aren't common knowledge isn't a helpful way to explain yourself. It is NOT saying that you need to let people walk all over you because "your disability isn't an excuse."
If you're diabetic, you don't have to eat the honey glazed ham that will send you into a coma (their example). But you also can't yell at the person offering it and accuse them of trying to kill you. You can just say "thanks, but my body can't handle that kind of sugar intake, so I'll pass"
If you run over someone's foot with your wheelchair you still apologise
we live a world where one man is a trillionaire while people are starving in gaza and sudan, 81 million people are below poverty line in india, kids are being forced to do manual labour in mines in congo to survive and his own countrymen are dying because they cannot afford healthcare and then people will wonder why we think capitalism is the root of all evil
some fandom spaces eventually reach a state i like to refer to as "yaoi toxicity", where the primary way the fanbase engages with women is not by interacting with the (sometimes admittedly few or poorly written) women in the text, but rather by instead reimagining the main yaoi ship as women. interestingly, this form of genderbending rarely involves imagining these male characters to be transgender women or considering the implications thereof, but rather seeks to address misogyny in both the text and the fanbase by just rule 63-ing the whole endeavor. the fact that this in and of itself is still misogynistic wrt the original material, as the genderbent characters and their resulting popularity as a pairing are still due to the privileging of even alternate-universe interpretations of the text's originally male characters over engaging with the originally female characters (if any) in any capacity, is often completely unaddressed.
i don't think there's anything inherently wrong with drawing or writing boy characters as girls or liking those kinds of fanworks, in fact sometimes i do it myself and quite enjoy it. i also recognize that a significant portion of fandom creators are female and/or lesbian, and are in part likely seeking to project their own identities onto the characters comprising the main yaoi ship (often some of the strongest and most-developed characters from the source media). however when this becomes widespread as a phenomenon i personally cannot help but think of it as a version of (largely) sfw a/b/o - of trying to subvert or vent about the struggles of misogyny via fanworks without addressing the underlying misogyny in the space itself; a way of achieving "women without women".
this is why the fact that these interpretations are usually contextless genderbend alternate universes and rarely explicit specific trans headcanons is particularly significant to me. in my mind, an obvious way to imagine "what if this male character was a woman" would be not to necessarily create an entire alternate universe where this cisgender male is her cisgender female "opposite", but instead to consider the implications of the idea that she was a closeted woman all along, and what effect this would have had on the narrative. however, this necessarily involves confronting misogyny and specifically transmisogyny in the text and in fan spaces, something that many genderbends seem unwilling or unable to do.
again. im not saying you're a bad person if you do or have done this, i literally have also done this, or that anyone should stop doing this for some implied moral reason. god knows fandom was built on the backs of women writing yaoi where one of the boys is the girl. im just saying that gravitating towards genderbend as a source of female representation instead of trans headcanon or getting interested in the text's intended female characters in the first place doesn't always strike me personally as a particularly interesting interpretation
Jackass Jenny #5 - Horsin' Around
[Support these comics over on my Ko-Fi!]
Leftmost horse, kneeling. That's Bojack's mother.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
bunch of elites and the bourgeoisie in a room talking about how they got to bind together against the regulars outside. i'm so glad we live in this fictional world. - matthew mercer
Pet peeve: That’s! Not! The bourgeoisie!
The Sundered Houses are, definitionally, titled! Nobles, aristocracy! They hold political power in their status as nobles through the Chamber of Lords Advisory. Their power literally runs in their bloodlines, as sorcerors.
The bourgeoisie are people who are not titled, who are businesspeople; their power comes first through wealth obtained in commerce. Dol-Makjar doubtless has a bourgeoisie, but they are not the Sundered Houses. (We’ve met some of them, like folks at Hand & Wheel; they may have started out as artisans, but their scale is too large not to have employees now.)
These are two different groups! The confluct between them defined a large chunk of the history of early modern Europe, not to mention the American Revolution! They definitely do also ally together at times against the working class!
Now, in a thematic sense, it is true that in the narrative of Aramán the Sundered Houses are in the place of the bourgeoisie in real history, with the Shapers in the place of the monarchs and aristocracy – some of the Sundered Houses fought with the Shapers, some fought with the lower classes against the Shapers, and the Sundered Houses have been seeking to gain the same position of rulership the Shapers and Obridimian Empire once had. But the Sundered Houses are in class terms very clearly aristocracy and not bourgeoisie.
Ironically, the people who make this content are the bourgeoisie.
I posted this in a bit of a mood yesterday and it's a bit glib and inaccurate. In reality the actors, comedians and producers behind this sort of TTRPG entertainment, Dropout, Critical Role, etc., are the petit-bourgeoisie. They act as both creator of labour and owner of capital, in that they profit from the brands they've created.
I know this is meant to be funny but it actually makes such a good point about how ADHD and executive dysfunction can impact people in really major ways, including financially
Pirate Witch~
I DIY'd my hat and corset, which are pretty important focal points in this look. I had so many inspirations, pirates, red mages, wizard and witch aesthetics, the list goes on!! This was for an event called Spell Bloom.
It took a few iterations to get here but overall happy with the aesthetic. I need to finish up some extra details like adding some appliqué detail to the gloves.
The rest of my outfits was styled using pieces from my closet.
Robe: hippie shake
Belt: la femme en noir
Long gold belt: amazon
Boots: thrifted
Bloomers: tiktok shop
V-glove: amazon
Hat and corset: made by me, using a scarlet darkness base corset and thrifted red velvet witch hat
I have just found. the COOLEST website???
Lost Kitchen Scrolls
It has a huge variety of historical recipes from different regions, taken from manuscripts, transcribed and translated, and a whole section of notes about the context for the recipe. It's really fun and I AM going to try a couple of these recipes.
Look at how this lamb recipe is presented:
This is just such a fun way to learn more about historical foodways and discover traditional cuisine.
Look at all the filters you can use:
Maybe if I can forage some good blackberries this year, I can make a 300 year old recipe for blackberry wine!
Anyway. Check out Lost Kitchen Scrolls.
see this is exactly what I'm talking about. this labour is so incredibly invisibilised that there are real human beings, walking about amongst us, leading normal lives, etc., who earnestly believe that machines can make an item of clothing from start to finish.
Hey just in case someone on here doesn’t quite understand how labor intensive making a garment is, here is a list of things that (to the best of my knowledge) cannot be done by machine alone, from a costumer/tailor in training
Cutting - in my opinion, the most labor intensive part of the process. The amount of time/effort needed varies depending on the pattern and if seam allowance is included or marked separately, but no matter what this process can not be done by machine. Each and every panel and piece of fabric that goes into a garment must be cut by hand by a person.
Pinning/clipping - pinning (or clipping) is the stage at which you align the pieces you are going to be stitching together and hold them together with — you guessed it! — either pins or clips. This can not be done by machine.
Stitching - the actual sewing. This can be done by a sewing machine, but that machine still needs to be operated by a human being.
Ironing/pressing - two words that mean the same thing. The iron itself is a machine, but once again, it needs to be operated by a human being.
Finishing - depending on the technique you use, there are certain finishing techniques that can only be done by hand. But, let’s assume we’re talking about fast fashion, which is usually just finished with a simple overlock/serger. Once again: these machines need to be operated by people.
These are just the basic steps to making a garment, and don’t include textile arts that I am not as knowledgeable about, such as weaving, knitting, and crochet. Also, it is important to note that there are a lot of things that can only be done by hand, such as certain stitches and decorative techniques.
Also, the machinery being operated in textile factories is not equivalent to a domestic sewing machine. We’re talking about one of these guys:
See that gray cylinder under the table, behind the knee pedal? That’s the motor. These machines can sew through your fingers bones and all and not even stop. The people in these factories and sweatshops are operating heavy machinery, and are subject to all the risk that comes with that in addition to all of the work I mentioned above.
Please respect textile workers and continue the fight to eliminate the use of sweatshops and exploited labor in the fashion industry!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I believe that if workers owned the means of production, we would be incentivized to reduce the amount of labor we needed to perform by making things high-quality in the first place. Why would we want to sew 100 pairs of low quality pants that won't last more than a year or two before the fabric degrades or the seams rip, when we could instead sew 100 pairs of high quality pants that last for years and years?
bunch of elites and the bourgeoisie in a room talking about how they got to bind together against the regulars outside. i'm so glad we live in this fictional world. - matthew mercer
Pet peeve: That’s! Not! The bourgeoisie!
The Sundered Houses are, definitionally, titled! Nobles, aristocracy! They hold political power in their status as nobles through the Chamber of Lords Advisory. Their power literally runs in their bloodlines, as sorcerors.
The bourgeoisie are people who are not titled, who are businesspeople; their power comes first through wealth obtained in commerce. Dol-Makjar doubtless has a bourgeoisie, but they are not the Sundered Houses. (We’ve met some of them, like folks at Hand & Wheel; they may have started out as artisans, but their scale is too large not to have employees now.)
These are two different groups! The confluct between them defined a large chunk of the history of early modern Europe, not to mention the American Revolution! They definitely do also ally together at times against the working class!
Now, in a thematic sense, it is true that in the narrative of Aramán the Sundered Houses are in the place of the bourgeoisie in real history, with the Shapers in the place of the monarchs and aristocracy – some of the Sundered Houses fought with the Shapers, some fought with the lower classes against the Shapers, and the Sundered Houses have been seeking to gain the same position of rulership the Shapers and Obridimian Empire once had. But the Sundered Houses are in class terms very clearly aristocracy and not bourgeoisie.
Ironically, the people who make this content are the bourgeoisie.
genuine question. if all production is exploiting someone how are artists supposed to produce their work? I mean is it any more or less exploitive than using phones or computers to access tumblr at all? is anything in our world free of exploitation? why focus on artists specifically?
Commodity fetishism.
The power dynamic between western artists and Asian workers is contained within the $30 plushie. If you're turning to sweatshop labor to "keep the lights on" then maybe they deserve to get shut off.
How are artists supposed to produce their work?
The current system is simple: they're not supposed to. The market only appreciates art where it can be commodified. An artist can produce art, even plushies and keyrings, without reliance on exploitative labour in other countries - though it is far less likely they will make enough money doing this for it to be a full income or a "sustainable business model".
But if you're only able to make rent because you're repeating the systems of oppression against exploited workers, then are you any better than the landlords?
The system is designed to oppress you or turn you into an oppressor. Take TADC as an example: putting aside any issues with the actors or production, did it need to be funded by successive waves of cheap merchandise that will exist for a blink of an eye then spend centuries congealing into a layer of polyesters in a landfill? Do you need that blind bag? That FunkoPop? Yet another plushie to go on your pile?
Remember these items don't just appear from nowhere, they're the end product of thousands of exploited workers and victims, from the oil workers who pump the crude, sacrificing their own health and that of everyone around them and the land itself; to the farmers who are forced to grow cotton on land that dies a little more each year, prompting another clearcut of rainforest and more indigenous peoples murdered; to the manufacturers who spin the polyesters and handle the chemical dyes; to the individual people - likely women - who are paid pennies for working hour after hour sewing yet another Pomni.
It is a chain of abuse. Your purchase isn't responsible for all that harm but it gives it reason to continue. And the artists who choose to engage in it continue it as well.
No, there is no ethical consumption under capitalism, that's the meaning of that phrase. But you can make choices to change your habits, and promote community around you, and be a little more aware of where the things you own actually come from and the costs behind them.
And maybe, think before buying more plushies that perpetuate the cycle.
UNPOPULAR OPINION: A lot of "mental health issues" disappear when bills are paid, rent is secure, and the fridge is full. Peace is expensive. And pretending money doesn't affect mental health is privilege.
Even in a post-capitalist, post-consumerist world, you still need to produce goods, as a result of this, you need factories because it is more effective to have a few people making a lot of clothes in a factory than every woman being forced to sit down and spin wool all day.
The issue with factories is poor wages, unsafe working conditions and environmental impact, all of which can be fixed through things like regulatory bodies and unions, the issue is not the fact that goods are no longer all made at home
Pastoral fetishism is not only not anticapitalist its antithetical to anticapitalism.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
You're right and you should say it.
every time some micro celebrity oc artist advertises their plushie fundraiser i exhale so deeply i fear my lungs might escape my ribcage
the labor exploitation isn't happening because i can't see it and im just a widdle artist trying to make a living . please buy my acrylic charms