Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Product Placement
cherry valley forever
Sweet Seals For You, Always
will byers stan first human second
❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Cosmic Funnies
noise dept.
if i look back, i am lost
almost home
Today's Document
Jules of Nature
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
occasionally subtle
Cosimo Galluzzi
Keni
Three Goblin Art
pixel skylines
seen from South Korea
seen from South Korea
seen from Singapore
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Iceland
seen from Brazil
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Poland
seen from India
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
@daerdeer
something to remember is that gabrielle and lestat killing his family is NOT in the book. in tvl the entire family save his father was killed by revolting sharecroppers (?) as apart of the revolution, and lestat actually felt very guilty about it. it was only a paragraph or two. so i personally think the time given for it was just fine.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I am certain we are going to get more of gabriella's turning: the parts leading up to it and around it. we have to remember show only fans do not have the context of why lestat turned her, or that they were in paris, or that lestat had been trying to isolate himself from everything from his human life up until that point, or the minimal contact he had had with her until then. since we know that, its easy to feel that they left things out since we know what exactly is missing. I wouldnt worry abt it yet. the main thread in which he is telling his backstory hasn't reached it.
who excited for nicki
raglan james has a glaring fagcent
ive talked abt how the show and books are very separate entities and to expect them to be the same is setting yourself up to be disappointed, however I am very surprised that more of the wolf killing scene was not shown. its a keystone event that they have been referencing since s1. I don't understand that decision.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I am very sad that they didnt adapt teen lestat getting dragged back by his brothers from the theater troupe he briefly ran away to.
We've never been more back
They said this was the episode with no Armand but all I see is Armand haunting the narrative. My little unsettling presence 🥰
gabrielle deserved to kill everyone while she was human btw. i know y'all love stories where characters who are forced to be wives and mothers ultimately comply with coercive patriarchal expectations by prioritizing the needs of kids they didn't want and couldn't abort over their own out of the pure goodness of their hearts or whatever the fuck else bullshit ur on. but gabrielle said not me bitch!
...I liked it
what time did ep1 come out last Saturday in Australia? like when did the megalink come out?
so my understanding it was around 2 pm est but I have no idea if it'll be the same this time
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
what time did ep1 come out last Saturday in Australia? like when did the megalink come out?
re that article: lestat isn't dead he's catatonic on the floor of a cathedral or chained up in the convent basement...memnoch truthers rise up
"what could armand possibly be telling the truth about?" YOU'VE REMEMBERED WHAT YOU DID TO YOURSELF IN SAN FRANCISCO AND YOU'RE ANGRY THAT I ERASED IT—YOU'VE NO RIGHT TO BE, YOU ASKED ME TO DO IT!!!!
sorry not only do i believe him because he speaks with more emotion in this line than all scenes in both seasons combined, i also believe him because that's a much more juicy and striking characterization of louis. like chew on that for a minute and tell me that doesn't make perfect sense with what we're being told to expect from s3
"the show is portraying him as an arrogant narcissistic asshole" lestat. 1800th century iconoclast, wolfkiller, traveling theater troupe heartthrob, "im going to run away to Paris with my depressed boyfriend and we'll survive on beer and vibes", brat prince, rose from the grave to be a rockstar, seduced the statue-mother-goddess of his species into the modern world, who called himself the devil so loudly and so often that the actual devil started to think he might be a good fit for the job? you're upset that people might think he's... a narcissist?
if iwtv continues to follow the same naming convention at what point do we stop calling it interview with the vampire/the vampire lestat/queen of the damned etc etc and start just calling it the vampire chronicles
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
the show Interview with the Vampire is wildly different from its source book, and it is - to my humble, biased opinion - one of the best shows ever made (flaws and all).
so while i am also nervous about the new season, i don't really understand the contempt - especially from people who loved s1 and 2 - bubbling up about the show diverging from the book The Vampire Lestat, based solely on the fact that it diverges.
adaptation as a process reveals a lot about our perspectives, biases, and influences. there is definitely such a thing as a bad adaptation. doubtless i'll be disappointed about some things that get left on the cutting room floor. doubtless i'll have critiques - maybe even serious, deal-breaking critiques - about how the show handles issues of race, gender, sexuality, abuse, etc.
but it is very strange to me to see derision being directed towards the writers for "not understanding the book" (especially after just one episode!). like maybe they do, maybe they don't, but the fact that the show is not a 1:1 reproduction of the book - or even that it may explore very different themes and character arcs, like they did with Interview with the Vampire - won't be the reason it fails for me, if fail it does. ymmv.
it's the same creative team as before (for better and for worse). it's always possible that they'll still drop the ball, but i doubt their talent and insight - and reading comprehension - just completely up and flew away.
thinking of watching the apparently shitty the queen of the damned movie for that aesthetically amazing portrayal of akasha.
