The "Tragedy of the Commons" was invented by a white supremacist based on a false history, and it's toxic bullshit
In a brilliant Twitter thread, UCSB political scientist Matto Mildenberger recounts the sordid history of Garrett Hardinâs classic, widely cited 1968 article âThe Tragedy of the Commons,â whose ideas are taught to millions of undergrads, and whose precepts are used to justify the privatization of public goods as the only efficient way to manage them.
Hardinâs paper starts with a history of the English Commons â publicly held lands that were collectively owned and managed â and the claim that commons routinely fell prey to the selfish human impulse to overgraze your livestock on public land (and that even non-selfish people would overgraze their animals because they knew that their more-selfish neighbors would do so even if they didnât).
But this isnât what actually happened to the Commons: they were stable and well-managed until other factors (e.g. rich people trying to acquire even more land) destabilized them.
Hardin wasnât just inventing false histories out of a vacuum. He was, personally, a nasty piece of work: a white supremacist and eugenicist, and the Tragedy of the Commons paper is shot through with this vile ideology, arguing that poor people should not be given charity lest they breed beyond their means (Hardin also campaigned against food aid). Hardin was a director of the Federation for American Immigration Reform and the white nationalist Social Contract Press, and co-founded anti-immigrant groups like Californians for Population Stabilization and The Environmental Fund.
Mildenberger argues that Hardin was a trumpist before Trump: He served on the board of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), whose talking points often emerge from Trumpâs mouth.
(Hardin quotes that didnât make it into his seminal paper: âDiversity is the opposite of unity, and unity is a prime requirement for national survivalâ and âMy position is that this idea of a multiethnic society is a disasterâŚwe should restrict immigration for that reason.â)
As Mildenberger points out, this isnât a case where a terrible person had some great ideas that outlived them: Hardinâs Tragedy of the Commons was a piece of intellectual fraud committed in service to his racist, eugenicist ideology.
Whatâs worse: the environmental movement elevates Hardin to sainthood, whitewashing his racism and celebrating âThe Tragedy of the Commonsâ as a seminal work of environmental literature. But Hardin is no friend of the environment: his noxious cocktail of racism and false history are used to move public lands into private ownership or stewardship, (literally) paving the way for devastating exploitation of those lands.
By contrast, consider Nobelist Elinor Ostromâs Governing the Commons, whose groundbreaking insights on the management of common resources are a prescription for a better, more prosperous, more egalitarian future.
https://boingboing.net/2019/03/07/scientific-fraud.html