Cassandra

Thinking you need to seek, implies you are someone searching to achieve or reach something separated.

You say you know and understand intellectually only, but then ask contradicting questions. No you don't "intellectually" understand, you're still trying to get somewhere and trying to claim "I know everything so please give me a new miracle information that will help me " UNdirectly. You're trying to convince bloggers ,and yourself, that you fully understand but you "can't do it" so they can give you something else that you haven't read already. You think there is a secret info to get you there. If you understood you would understand how futile that is.

If you "understood intellectually", you would understand why seeking is useless, and those questions too. It's written why that is the case everywhere, but you refuse to understand because you still think you're lacking and you are still waiting to get results from your seeking. You are refusing to drop that idea.

To brighten your day

I have absolutely no idea, I want a lot but never thought of a dream piece, I trust you to give me ideas, vends moi du rêve as we say

J’vais commencer à râler parce qu’il fait beau et que j’ai rien à râler

Tell me you don’t understand ND without saying you don’t understand ND

Let’s not get too complicated now, if by your logic , experience is real then what exactly is non duality even about? What exactly are we doing here?

The whole essence of this “practice” comes down to the exact same thing, reality is not as real as we assume it is, it is not even real point blank

Denying experience is akin to nihilism which is not what we are pointing to, experience is real in the sense that is APPEARS to be happening, you can’t go around telling everyone “oh you aren’t real” “oh this isn’t real” , you can’t decide to stop eating , having your bath because nothing is inherently real

In a dream , do you deny the experience of the dream? Ofc there is an experience but in the truth is that dream real? Is it a real independent occurrence? Or in virtual reality , can you say that the virtual game experience doesn’t exist? No, because it does; you are literally experiencing it but does that now mean that such experience is a real one?

It is a subtlety one must notice carefully, experience is real in the sense that we can’t deny it’s presence but in its very core; there is no such thing as an experience

I have listened to swami sarvapriyananda many times (I am going to assume that’s who you mean because just swami literally translates to teacher in Hindu) and no where does he say to regard this reality as substantial, it completely contradicts the very teachings of non dualism

Anon : *takes one part of the sentence that fits their narrative and ignores the rest to feel validated in their opinion that is : us saying bs*

"..It's all the same.

"Humans" consider themselves unique, so they've rooted their whole theory of existence on their uniqueness.

"One (1)" is their unit of measure, but it's not. All social systems we put into place are a mere sketch. 1 + 1 = 2. That's all we've learned.

But 1 + 1 has never equaled 2.

There are in fact no numbers and no letters.

We've codified our existence to bring it down to "human" size to make it comprehensible.

We've created a scale so that we can forget its unfathomable scale.

"But if humans are not the unit of measure, and the world isn't governed by mathematical laws,what governs all that?" -Prof. Samuel Norman

-> Film a car speeding down a road, speed up the image infinitely, and the car disappears.

So what proof do we have of its existence?

"Time" gives legitimacy to its existence. [...] Without "time" "we" don't exist."

I rly hope some of you are taking advantage of BeingIs' "treasure trove"

notice what's noticing. see what's constantly here and permanent.