only known in and of oneself
strange provisions, thought experiments
always so to speak
nothing to figure out, this is immediate
Jules of Nature
$LAYYYTER
KIROKAZE
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year


JVL
Three Goblin Art
tumblr dot com

çĽćĽ / Permanent Vacation
todays bird
DEAR READER
ojovivo
art blog(derogatory)

Kiana Khansmith
Not today Justin
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Keni

â
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from Argentina

seen from T1
seen from Russia
seen from Netherlands
seen from Guatemala
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Hungary
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from South Africa

seen from United States

seen from Argentina

seen from Malaysia
@unknowable-known
only known in and of oneself
strange provisions, thought experiments
always so to speak
nothing to figure out, this is immediate

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Being says that desires dissolve, but you say you donât have to dissolveâI wonder which of you is right. Letâs say Iâm craving a burger: can I just poof and conjure up a burger menu in my hand out of thin air, or does it require a processâlike someone giving it to me, me buying it, or me going out to get it myself? Is that how it happens?
Itâs all just pointless semantics. There is no need to compare writing styles or use of words of all these different writers lol. Iâm being for real, youâre wasting your time sussing that out. Itâs so so pointless. What even is a desire? Who is desiring?
Focus on the common thread discussed, words are never causing the seeing
Also why would there be a need to change desire into âno desireâ if these sentiments naturally relax/âdissolveâ upon self seeing? Right? Is anything actually changing if itâs all THAT? NO.
And finally, most of us writers are very explicit in saying to never trust what we say. To directly see it for yourself. Beingis also constantly harps on not over analyzing their own writing, itâs merely pointers for directly noticing.
(I'm using a translator because I don't speak English) I think I should stop spending hours reading blogs on Tumblr. There's nothing new to see anymore, nothing that's the final piece that will change my whole perspective. I already know everything and also know nothing, because no concept exists, consciousness has no concept and, in the "end," it's not even called consciousness. I used to spend hours on blogs looking for answers, some even difficult to understand because of the complicated words they use. Your blog (there are others that are also great) is the simplest to understand everything. You don't condemn having desires, dreams (I know these things are illusory) and you don't use such complicated words. But, in the end, there's nothing to understand. I'm not a confused person, confusion is an illusion, I am the illusion, only the " " exists. I think I'll reduce the time I spend reading various blogs, go back to drawing, reading, and acquire some other habit that I really want. I'm "neglecting to live my life" to find an answer, knowing that everything is a big illusion. Maybe I trust myself a little, but "trust" is also an illusion. Maybe I create a script for some experience I want to try. I clung to this "concept" of non-dualism because I'm going through a difficult time in my life, but it doesn't exist, this life doesn't exist. I clung to it because I saw non-dualism as a new and simplified method of the law of assumption or the law of attraction, but even that doesn't exist, nothing exists. I think I'll reduce my screen time and live and experience something (I know I already experience and live everything, I'm not good at explaining things in a way that isn't dualistic đđđ). Thank you for being so simple in your words.
We donât condemn anything. Nobody is good at explaining in language lol. Just remind yourself itâs always ultra simple. Any complexity is an illusion. Any seeming complexity is a joke unto yourself.
Iâm tired I tried noticing nothing is changing
And yes I know nothing has to change because thatâs only an appearance appearing but what now ?
Itâs like I canât seem to notice no matter how much I try.
I canât notice what I am all I notice are thoughts
Stop trying so hard. I know to you it might seem counterintuitive but take a step back and just be playful with this.
im getting started, how do i direct experience?
See that thereâs no need to start anything

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Do you still have any wishes or desires, Unk ? Or have you lost the desire for them because you can experience them the moment you wish for themâbecause you can create them instantly?
Nothing is ever lost, thatâs for certain. You already know the answer to this for yourself anyway. Nothing to give up, nothing to accept, no contradictions. Just you.
No need to focus on analyzing why it feels like âme a body and the externalâ experientiallyâdigging away at conceptually solving âseparation.â Thereâs nothing to figure out here. It was never separate in the first place, so there is no answer to this misguided question. It seems like this because weâre cool af
See that âinside vs outsideâ is merely a slippery interpretation with no stability. See that even âexperientiallyâ there is nothing with staying power. You move around, perspectives of âspacesâ constantly shift, the body and mind are a flurry of thought/sensations like a trillion lights going on and off infinitely. No solidity.
How could any of this be actual? How can we ever be certain of continuity when nothing is ever the same? In turn, where is the solid continuous person that could ever be certain of anything? Itâs stunningly clear when you simply noticeâŚnothing is ever continous or actually here in an ontological wayâŚnothing is ever an actual âfeature of realityâ
Without interpretations, what remains? Something, ineffable. Our own conceptual mystery. The only âfeatureâ of reality is being, no-thing, THAT
being is aware of our awareness yes or no?
Being is being itself. You are aware of yourself.
You use the term "self seeing/seen" a lot, which I somewhat understand but also somewhat feels like it goes over my head.. but I think now I've gotten it, like it's self seen because it's all me, all " ". Like I'm seeing myself in everything?
Just see that being is the only âstabilityâ âeverything else is otherwise, or not stable. Even seemingly solid objects are not perceived in stability, no? You walk around and the perspective of âsolid external objectsâ is constantly changing, right? Is your body ever solidly perceived, or as certain as being is? Not really, the body is just all these appearing sensations with no lasting stability, right? The only solid certainty is being or no-thing. Everything else is just waves of being. Notice the solidity of yourself, being. Notice the instability of everything else that being appears asâŚ
(random fact) i just realized that, since "awareness" and "consciousness" is translated the same in french (conscience), we make the difference by specifying/saying it's "la prĂŠsence attentive" (the attentive presence) and somehow it points nicely to this nothingness
Yeah thereâs a lot of words, and theyâre meaningless ultimately. It is interesting how all these languages can connote very poorly or more streamlined
I remember there was an era on tumblr where folks discussed the diff between âconsciousnessâ and âawarenessâ lolâshits still going on subtilely amongst many writers. Kinda pointless tbh.
Tho it seems like some languages are âbuilt betterâ for this, like French (amongst many other languages). English is kinda insane. Just another example how all this writing is merely creative pointers, itâs never causing the âseeingâ
And is there truly a difference between âconsciousness and awarenessâ at the end of the day? Not really. Itâs all nothing. The âtechnicalâ differentiation is insubstantial, vague, slippery when you really lookâŚ

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Hi Why do people say that the chain of eventsâcause, effect and how things workâmust exist in the world, and that this is how things work? Iâve seen a few people explain this through non-dualism, and itâs left me confused.
Just see what remains (you) aside all these concepts or mental intricacies, see what remains aside what appears as solid or external
Itâs very simple
What remains cannot be reduced, fragmented, transient, or have a constantly changing perspective. We just are. What remains is everything that seems just the same. Nothing specific or definitive, just this.
âInfiniteâ or openness doesn't need conceptual maintenance. Never did. Whereas limits seem like a continuous âassertionâ
And youâre not trying to find a state of âseeing limitlessâ it already is this way! You just notice. Itâs not like infinity is flashing before your eyes in a mystical sense. Itâs simply just what isâŚnothing special or specific. Itâs not something known, but also is known. Itâs implicit, âsubtleâ
Hi Could you explain why anything is possible?
Because no limit is verifiable. Any limit would just be another position, perception, or ideaâall of which are being/nothing already. Being is never anything specific, itâs just what isâŚ
And itâs not that everything is possible/limitlessness is verified by an âindividual mind,â itâs just what remains, always. Whereas limits and frameworks need an individual mind to be verified. But there is no actual solid individual mind or limits when you look. So what remains is âthe infiniteâ or openness
Do you see the difference?
Both are ideas at the end of the day, but one remains implicitly and clearly

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
đď¸ 52 Years Ago Today (April 28, 1974) DRM NĂźrburgring Eifelrennen: The #4 Alpina 3.0CSL driven by Siegmund Ogrodowczyk finished in 5th place.
Paul Elie Ranson, Tiger in the Jungle (Tigre dans les jungles), 1893