i personally think they should kiss it out on the subject of not wanting to hear each other's names āæā„āæā„āæ
yes i agree they should fuck it out as well, sorry for using soft language š
Today's Document
trying on a metaphor

titsay
d e v o n

Love Begins
taylor price
RMH

ā
Keni

⣠Chile in a Photography ā£
Claire Keane

blake kathryn

izzy's playlists!
Cosmic Funnies
EXPECTATIONS
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

tannertan36

Origami Around

Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Mexico

seen from T1
seen from Türkiye
seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@cannibalspicnic
i personally think they should kiss it out on the subject of not wanting to hear each other's names āæā„āæā„āæ
yes i agree they should fuck it out as well, sorry for using soft language š

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
im going to write a long meta on the unholy family anyway given the amount of cope ive seen in regards to the seance, but i do need to say one thing now. if your first response to Claudia's pain, outrage and breaking down in that scene where she finally gets across her innermost feelings is to say: "oh she's a ghost this isn't how she actually feels" you. don't. like. Claudia.
the very same people who clung to the Train Scene to eternally victimise her, and took her word as gospel back then, are the same ones now claiming not to believe her when she is finally speaking her truth. is our love for Claudia conditional? do we only love the season one Claudia who is a "girlboss feminist" who creates a plan to murder the "evil white patriarch"? do we not love her when she attacks her black father figure (because supposedly black men are incapable of causing black women any pain right?) for the multiple times he failed her in her life?
there seems to be selective understanding of the black characters in this show. when they do something "acceptable" (e.g. killing Lestat) they are treated like martyrs by the fanbase. the minute they step out of this role fans want to box then into (e.g. ghost!Claudia or the Regina plotline) this is somehow racist character writing because people don't want to accept that black characters are allowed to be imperfect.
it's always "female rage" until it's a black woman. and this time supposedly all of said black woman's anguish and hatred towards the men who mistreated her entire life somehow is not real because it doesn't fit the kind of idea of female rage that people want.
i just can't.
What's funny to me is that they say Lestat didn't get lashings from her and that the train scene being revealed as a lie as 'absolving him' is that they don't get it, Claudia lying about the train and admitting it to his face was the lashing.
Not only she killed him, but she also proved Louis just believed her lies without question. How little he trusted Lestat and how couldn't even ask about it. She is basically telling him: Ha, see? He doesn't love you as much you love him.
And that stings, even if Lestat doesn't react much because he is not delusional like Louis.
that 10000% percent, she mocked his feelings for Louis that entire scene, Louis believing her over Lestat about the lie over Train Scene is the gut-punch to Lestat because that's clearly the part of the book that disturbed him more than anything. she is adding insult to an already serious injury. my second point here is, why did people even expect Lestat to get another round of lashings anyway? i don't understand the idea that Lestat's character must be paying constant penance every single second of every episode. Claudia lashes at Lestat all throughout season one, (conspires and nearly successfully plots his murder), continues to express how much she hates him during season two, and even rips him to shreds during The Trial (good for her!) she managed to mostly get what she wanted to say off her chest to Lestat before she died.
yes, it was Lestat who contacted Merrick, but it was for Louis. for Louis to receive closure, that scene wasn't really about Lestat in the way i think a lot of people were expecting. it was for Louis to properly reckon with not only his mistreatment of Claudia (because to some extent by this season he has realised that hence the false "atonement" and attempt to recreate the past with Regina) but the fact he romanticised her so much and never actually considered her opinion of him. Louis was the one who needed to receive this metaphorical bashing from Claudia. as she says "Lestat is who he says he is" (a really nice call-back to "call me a dog, but an honest dog" in 1x06) so these words weren't meant to resonate with him more than Louis. if any of these people listened to Delainey, Jacob and Sam speak in the after dark i think they would understand the scene a bit more (or maybe even just rewatched 1x06/1x07 for the plot inconsistencies the writers planted OR the very brilliant way 1x06 really shows you the undercurrent of the family dynamic of you watch the episode purely from Lestat or Claudia's perspective and try to compartmentalise Louis' perspective because it opens up so much)
THE CRAFT
1996, dir. Andrew Fleming
130 favorite horror movies: (102/130)
"i can't believe that godzilla was the last of his species. if nuclear testing continues, then someday, somewhere in the world, another godzilla may appear."
-godzilla (1954) dir. ishiro honda
maker and fledgeling reading Louis de Pointe du Lac's mind

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The devil and his minion.
ASSAD ZAMAN as ARMAND
INTERVIEW WITH THE VAMPIRE 2.01 Ā· What Can the Damned Really Say to the Damned
THE VAMPIRE LESTAT 03.06 | "Montreal"
INTERVIEW WITH THE VAMPIRE 02.08 | "And That's The End of It. There's Nothing Else" script
Wow, look at you, all grown up.
Julia Doyle as Sophia
"If a Tree Falls in the Forestā¦" | From 4x10
Armand's Guide to Stopping Lestat's Stupid Great Conversion (with Daniel Molloy)
Step 1. Ask Very Nicely (Failed)
Step 2. Break Up the Band (Failed)
Step 3. Bring in the Boyfriend (Failed)
Step 4. Deploy Public Shaming (Failed)
Step 5. Start Chopping Heads (Results Pending)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
scone butch... The person for all your pastry and lesbian needs
scone butch blueberries
on sharing one's opinons
Are they wearing fucking Loustat masks???? ššš
YES THEY ARE!!!!!!!
Some of y'all are relly angry that The Vampire Lestat is about the vampire Lestat
hot take possibly? but i actually think itās okay for things to be marketed for adults. itās literally okay if things arenāt suitable for children. i feel like we are losing the plot
Correct. Furthermore: children bending or breaking the rules to get a peek at something that's not intended for them is a part of growing up.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
saying this as a lesbian who loves women's boobs--sexually, even! but i don't think that we as a society should consider breasts inherently female or inherently sexual. a flat chest should not be seen as the "default" for gender neutrality but instead just one way a person can present. boobs should be normal. anyone of any gender can have boobs
Rolin and co are trying very hard to convince you that Armand is the antagonist of TVL but heās not. Heās getting the villain edit right now but villainy is the not the same as the structural role of an antagonist, the person creating obstacles to the protagonistās actualization.
Lestat was Louisās antagonist in the first season, and now heās our protagonist. Armand was the antagonist in season 2, so people are primed to just view him in the same way.
But Gabriella is actually Lestatās antagonist. Thatās why Rolin talked about her as the second most important character this season. Sheās the one pushing Lestat into a role he doesnāt want and preventing him from making peace with his muses. Sheās the one bringing on the end of the world and using sex to manipulate and abuse him.
Louis is the B plot protagonist this season; his plot with Bruce, Regina, and Claudia is its own separate little track. But the fact that he and Lestat are finally not each otherās antagonists is what is allowing them to slowly but surely come back together this season.
Armand is actually the protagonist of the C plot of the series. Theyāve chosen to completely mask the whereās and the whys of that c plot from view of the audience. Theyāre using it to generate suspense, and to show that weāre still firmly rooted in a limited point of view even in this new season. When Lestat doesnāt know what Armand is doing, neither do we.
Theyāre going to reveal at least part of what Armand has been up to in his own little side plot in the finale, at least enough for his actions to make sense and to understand how they impact Lestat. Theyāre trying to convince us heās the villain now because it will make the reveal of his real motives, which I guarantee are more complicated than ābeing evilā more of a subversion and a surprise. Armand has been that last minute twist (Volta, if you will) in every season so far, and I donāt think this one is going to be any different.
The only thing Iām sure about what theyāre setting up is that whatever Armand is doing is going to be the opposite of what is āexpectedā (by general audiences I have to say, not real Armand understanders). Instead of standing by helplessly, he is trying very hard to prevent something. Instead of destruction, heās protecting something (while still being willing to break a few Larry shaped eggs to make an omelette š). I think he is doing it with a real sense of brokenness and bitterness that Louis and Lestat have rejected him so thoroughly, but heās still showing up. What were effectively going to see in ep 7 is the end point (or maybe the midpoint really) of Armandās arc. Heās been changing behind the scenes, but we donāt know how. That character shift is part of the reveal.
If I had to guess, I would say that I donāt think weāre going to get a full window into whatās going on with Armand until season 4. When Lestat is grabbed by Akasha and is no longer around to limit our perspective, thereās going to be a chance to relive the whole thing from Armandās POV. At that point he will finally be the protagonist of his own story, and weāll be able to see a full arc from him. And I actually suspect theyāll start that timeline much further in the past, with flashbacks to the 70s and 80s with Daniel and maybe even glimpses of Venice, and take it through the time of the tour. That would be fitting with the way the book Queen of the Damned is structured, with a focus on Devilās minion and a structure that repeats the timeline of The Vampire Lestat, just viewed through different perspectives. That was also the book where Armand transformed from an antagonist into a character in his own right in Anneās mind So I donāt think we should expect a full Armand arc until 2028 (š). (I also hope season 4 will give us multiple other POVs as well to match the structure of qotd, but thatās just more future speculating at this point).