im not "defending" the lestat's turning/louis killing bruce parallel scene bc im not on rolin jones's payroll, but i need pepole to understand that this is another "both/and" moment, okay?
the scene is meant to communicate several things which are simultaneously true regardless their contradictions:
1) claudia and lestat lived similar lives, societal position aside
2) they never understood each other in this way because lestat abused claudia, which was enabled by oppression, which neither of them had control over, but lestat unintentionally weaponized
3) lestat has come around to understanding who claudia was on this deeper level because he had the gift of the "many nights in front of [him] where [he] might learn to live honestly" that claudia never got (because of his abuse, both louis and lestat know this is fundamentally unfair!)
4) loustat's relationship to claudia was and is fundamentally characterized by the original sin of her nonconsensual transition to undeath. they killed her and made her their own. as for louis, there was never any hope of a relationship btwn him and claudia that wasnt marked by how he hopes she will absorb his sins in life and undeath (his exploitation of others) and purify him. and any and all interaction either of them have with her (commodified, post-book release!) memory will be somewhat exploitative because of this context.
5) claudia really was just the roof shingle that flew off loustat's house, another round in their stormy romance
6) she was their whole world
















