It would have taken another immortal to keep up with him.
so i haven't read the books but i did read the Devil's Minion chapter and this part made me laugh out loud:
Fai_Ryy

Kiana Khansmith
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
d e v o n
Mike Driver
Cosimo Galluzzi

Discoholic 🪩
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
macklin celebrini has autism

shark vs the universe
One Nice Bug Per Day
Monterey Bay Aquarium
KIROKAZE
ojovivo
Jules of Nature
occasionally subtle

Origami Around

roma★
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr
seen from Spain
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from Poland
seen from T1

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Ireland
seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from Vietnam

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from Poland
seen from T1
seen from Italy
seen from Ireland

seen from Malaysia
@bubbletinii
It would have taken another immortal to keep up with him.
so i haven't read the books but i did read the Devil's Minion chapter and this part made me laugh out loud:

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
louis is in on the beheading. he knew it was coming. he knew it the whole time in e6.
i think louis is doing this with armand/daniel because he wants to stop lestat from being killed. armand/daniel prob has a different motive but louis i think is in on it.
Another thing to consider: it was his restaurant that they ate at earlier in the night so he could have put something in Lestat’s drink
That’s a very interesting point! I’m not sure if they put something in the drink, but it is suspicious that Louis had been reserving a member of the Lioncourt bloodline as a special drink for Lestat, especially since this was also apparently meant to be a callback to 1x07. I think it’s possible Armand and Daniel told Louis who “Sofia” actually is but he didn’t believe it, and had to see it for himself. Lestat not having any problem drinking from his own bloodline becomes proof of what Armand and Daniel would be saying. It’s also suspicious that the revenge porn video came to Louis specifically through text, and no one else seemed to say anything about it to Lestat. Even just framing it like it’s for a public audience is enough to shake someone, I think.
Louis then drinks Lestat’s blood, perhaps it’s for extra strength for when his head gets cut off, with pointing out Alex being an ok signal to Daniel and Armand. He did bring dreamstat out to a bench to essentially kill him (from his mind) in season 2 too.
I highly doubt Louis didn’t notice Lestat’s behavior being so off throughout the events of this season, especially in the way Lestat is talking to him. Lestat asks Louis why he didn’t call when he got shot— and something interesting that another person pointed out was that we see Louis get shot multiple times in Season 1 and he didn’t even flinch. Which then also reminds me of this quote from TVA:
“[Lestat] must make a gutter theatrical out of stubbing his toe.”
As I mentioned in my tags, the main purpose of the Dubai interview was to prevent the great conversion. But also, if there’s one thing that Louis and Armand bonded on throughout the years in-spite of the lies and everything was how they felt Lestat treated them, especially as people of color.
Even if Louis does want to make up with Lestat, I think he would be more careful about whether Lestat has changed or not. As we can see as an audience, he has not and I can imagine Louis would’ve noticed it too. That’s not to say he hasn’t changed at all or doesn’t want to, but there are big factors (like Gabriella!!!) still playing a part in preventing him from full growth. There’s also a degree of antagonism that needs to remain in Lestat in order for the QOTD events to happen.
But I digress. Essentially what I’m saying is that I can see why Louis would align with Armand and Daniel on the great conversion despite everything else and this post kinda became a braindump, lol.
i also thought the sex tape was strange - the fact that it was just on louis's phone (almost out of the blue). it doesn't seem like it was made public either? but i'm not sure.
another thing weird to me is how easily louis just brushed over ghost!claudia. in s1 and 2, that would have made him depressed as fuck for 365 business days. for him to just be like okay and then sit on the bench after the most diabolical racially charged language being thrown at him by his own daughter - something tells me even ghost!claudia is something louis knows about - either it not being actual ghost!claudia or something else. that i don't know (they also had to mention 'fraudia' in the beginning and louis had a bit of a strange reaction to it).
louis's complacency all throughout e6 was just really ooc in general. louis loves lestat, but we've seen him push back multiple times in s1 and even to dreamstat. it's just very ooc to me that he was just not challenging lestat at all. and this may mean nothing at all but louis had a teaser where he's being interviewed by daniel. i think he might even be in the same exact outfit as e6? i need to fact check (or if someone else beats me to it, please rb or reply and let me know).
he mentions that lestat's music is passable which contradicts his reaction to the performance lestat gave him. i think louis did feel moved by the song but if this clip has anything to do with this, it seems he is being interviewed by daniel perhaps after they put his head back on and he's saying passable to discourage people from attending the concert or possibly derailing the plan - not sure.
edit: he is indeed in the same outfit in that interview teaser. i couldn't find it on twitter but i did find it on reddit here.
ASSAD ZAMAN as Armand
THE VAMPIRE LESTAT (2026) 3.04 — The Devil's Road
Feeling normal.
There are some points of tvl criticism I'm willing to debate and where I can very much see both sides (or even think the #haters are stretching it a little) but like. You cannot really deny that this season has shown a pattern of prioritizing white characters and their emotional journey over characters of color. On top of that, so many of the jokes are "punching down", starting with the pronoun joke in ep 1 followed by a continuous barrage of throw-away comments. And then, six episodes into a season with an all-white writers room, we have Claudia say "there's something etched in your ribs that says you're a slave". There's no reckoning with how horrifically racist this statement is, neither in the text nor the paratext. It's just sitting there, poisoning what otherwise could have been an incredible scene. Poisoning a season that felt like it was actually slowly finding its footing. It's white privilege to watch that scene and not feel, on some level, attacked by those racist words put in a Black actor's mouth by white writers. To not be haunted by the racist implications of "my bleak, black life." Before, a lot of the writing choices registered as thoughtless; at this point, it's hard to see them as anything but malicious.
People excusing the "slave" line because it comes from the book are being extremely generous toward the writers. The writer's chose to change the races of two main characters and have, for the most part, successfully deviated from the source material to account for that change for the past 2 seasons. They could've easily done it here as well. I don't like that people are trying to pretend that there isn't a racial connotation attached to it now. If they really felt it necessary to include it in the show, it should've been handled with more care imo. This combined with the other racist comments said in the same scene — that a lot of people are choosing to ignore, since they have no "it comes from the source-material" excuse to fall back on here— makes that scene really uncomfortable, to say the least.
I'm not black and I don't want to speak for or talk over those of you who are, so please feel free to completely disregard my opinion or correct me here. Assuming it really is Claudia saying those words, the racist language used in that scene doesn't make sense to me. I've tried to understand it and I can't. I'm South Asian and there isn't a world where I can imagine an argument between two South Asian people where one of them calls the other "a curry-munching monkey" mid argument, in an attempt to hurt them as much as possible. Like hello?????? That's weaponising stereotypes that would be used against both of us by racists/our oppressors. I've tried to understand it but I just can't.
And in the off-chance where this scene will be expanded on later and there is some explanation as to why she said the things she said, I still don't think the writer's room should have the free reign to use that language in their scripts without black writers in there. It's obviously an issue. This many people wouldn't be off-put by it if it wasn't an issue. Stop being willfully ignorant.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
TVL spoiler:
All I’m saying is that it’s telling that before Claudia started ripping into Louis, she had to confirm that he’s back together with Lestat. Another one over her, over her memory. Louis does a séance to say goodbye, he hangs her dress on the wall, but he’s gone back to Lestat which is the one thing she never wanted for him. Even as they were under the threat of dying, she’s trying to remind him he’s hurting you again. Trying to pull him from that edge. And when it’s confirmed that after everything it was all for naught, all resentment boils over.
I don’t think everything Claudia said is true true. Bear with me, I fear I’m sounding like I’m dismissing Claudia but I’m not trying to. I believe she thought of poisoning Louis, yes, you can’t keep a child in an environment Claudia was in and expect them to not be a resentful of both parents. Louis is the one who saved her from the fire, but he doesn’t know who he is and that makes him weak. He can’t untangle himself without her. How burdening. But underneath that there was love, because they were both victims of Lestat. That’s why she didn’t poison Louis because there is a notch in his rib that read slave and she wanted to free him. Then comes the ritual and Louis has not freed himself, he failed her because he went from Lestat’s to Her’s to Armand then back to Her’s lugging her corpse to define himself. Thats the crux of her resentment and by the time she’s face to face with it she’s lost everything her life, her Madeleine, and there’s Louis so she tears into him, saying things she might not mean but she knows will hurt him like he’s hurting her and hurt her in life.
I don’t like the writers using Claudia / Delainey to call Louis nappy headed (seriously fuck them) but that’s what I’m choosing to interpret this scene.
I agree with literally everything you said here but if in this scene, Claudia was trying to hurt him as much as possible, the biggest question for me is then why didn't it work? Why is Louis so unaffected by it in the scene that immediately follows? It's such a huge contrast from s2 when he attempted to end it all at the thought of Claudia not loving him. Sure he was on drugs and depressed in San Fran, but he's been distraught over Claudia for like 70-ish years at this point, you'd think he'd have more of a reaction. Like that scene alone kinda undermines the whole Regina plot thus far for me too (I think some shit will go down with her in episode 7 so I guess that plot line hasn't really concluded yet so we'll have to see what they do with this, I guess). Like after everything am I supposed to believe Claudia telling him she hates him more than anybody in the world was actually the closure he needed? Or is it the fact that Lestat was there that softened the blow for him? Or was this initial rection just shock and they're going to actually go into it in more depth later? Idk I'm not really happy with any of these answers to why he dgaf. I'm genuinely asking, what is everyone else's interpretation of that scene?
Hello, Arun.
ASSAD ZAMAN as ARMAND THE VAMPIRE LESTAT 1.01
#his boy from san francisco
ok so like did he want 70s daniel to resurface again? and his memories along with him?
Pulling out my Magician tarot card for anyone with an Armand infested brain
Please take a look on Instagram @ iwtvtarot for some amazing news!!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
he was bracing himself for bad news
in The Vampire Armand by Anne Rice - Armand is compared to Verrocchio's David (seen below).
Armand in Interview with the Vampire:
lestat (loves big gestures and extravagant displays) probably gave armand (loves items and feeling special) so many presents
emotional lestat
DEVIL'S MINION DETAILS (INTERVIEW WITH THE VAMPIRE)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I wonder how many of Armand's victims have actively fought back during his "easeful death" speech the way Daniel did.
Daniel's interruptions may be small — not loud or flailing or aggressive — but they're impactful. And while Armand remains composed throughout and continues his practiced monologue without wavering, I'd say for the first three quarters of it he's talking at Daniel. He talks over him, but not really to him. Not until the very end.
Daniel rebuts with:
"I don't want to rest."
"I like my life."
"I have a thing happening in the city."
"I'm a bright young reporter with a point of view."
He's trying so hard to cling onto life. He doesn't want death, even if it is an easeful one. Armand cuts that last interjection off with a "ssh-ssh-ssh," which makes me think this might be a point where Armand's patience is tested. Because things aren't going the way they perhaps normally go when he gives this speech! Daniel isn't begging for death! He's resisting!
And so then, Armand says "rest" a lot near the end of the speech, which we know by this point is an indicator of him controlling bodies. He says, "It's okay, it's okay, it's okay. It'll feel like a bath. Rest. Like honey on your tongue," etc, and maybe this is Armand struggling and fighting harder to get Daniel into the state of obeisance that he wants in his victims. The speech hasn't been working as intended, so he has to rely more on his methods of control and hypnosis.
And finally, after all this, you can see the moment when Daniel finally falls into the trance. It's after a lot of effort on Armand's part, and after he's resorted to his cheaper tricks.
So, if we do get a past Devil's Minion arc, I can see Armand fixating on the fact that Daniel was able to resist the pull and performance of Gentleman Death for an impressive amount of time. That despite all the words Armand said to him, he still longed for life.
Maybe this is what makes him fascinating.
Devils minion 🩸