You can only reblog this on the 3st of January
the 3st huh?
the 3st.
The Thirst.

blake kathryn
occasionally subtle

Product Placement
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
Three Goblin Art

Discoholic đŞŠ

if i look back, i am lost
Acquired Stardust

Andulka

titsay
Cosimo Galluzzi
art blog(derogatory)

cherry valley forever

pixel skylines
Jules of Nature
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

Origami Around
wallacepolsom

seen from China

seen from Germany
seen from Brazil
seen from India

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from Italy
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany
seen from Indonesia
seen from France

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Lithuania
seen from Netherlands

seen from United Kingdom
seen from T1
@biodiversityisessential
You can only reblog this on the 3st of January
the 3st huh?
the 3st.
The Thirst.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
reblog to send three ghosts after elon musk
#each rb is an additional three ghosts right
THE MONARCH BUTTERFLY IS NOW OFFICIALLY ENDANGERED AND ON THEÂ âRED LISTâ
According to the 2021 count, there are roughly 1,914 monarch butterflies alive. A day ago, the monarch butterfly was put the on the endangered species list, also known as the âred listâ. The red list is the IUCNâs list of endangered species and is updated every two years. It includes 41,000+ species, with 1,300+ of those species in the US. However, it is likely that around 1,000,000 (1 million) animal and plant species are threatened with extinction.
I will likely do this later, but if youâd like to see my usual profile on endangered species for the monarch butterfly, continue below.
This is a Higgins Eye, a type of pearlymussel. It is currently endangered, like most mussels. For more info, go below.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
CLIMATE CHANGE ALERT
Hi!
I just wanted to let you all know:
CHEMICAL POLLUTION HAS PASSED A SAFE LIMIT FOR HUMANITY
Thatâs right, we have succeeded in beginning to extinct ourselves. Look at this quote from The Guardian:
âThe cocktail of chemical pollution that pervades the planet now threatens the stability of global ecosystems upon which humanity depends, scientists have said.
Plastics are of particularly high concern, they said, along with 350,000 synthetic chemicals including pesticides, industrial compounds and antibiotics. Plastic pollution is now found from the summit of Mount Everest to the deepest oceans, and some toxic chemicals, such as PCBs, are long-lasting and widespread.
The study concludes that chemical pollution has crossed a âplanetary boundaryâ, the point at which human-made changes to the Earth push it outside the stable environment of the last 10,000 years.
Chemical pollution threatens Earthâs systems by damaging the biological and physical processes that underpin all life. For example, pesticides wipe out many non-target insects, which are fundamental to all ecosystems and, therefore, to the provision of clean air, water and food.
âThere has been a fiftyfold increase in the production of chemicals since 1950 and this is projected to triple again by 2050,â said Patricia Villarrubia-GĂłmez, a PhD candidate and research assistant at the Stockholm Resilience Centre (SRC) who was part of the study team. âThe pace that societies are producing and releasing new chemicals into the environment is not consistent with staying within a safe operating space for humanity.â
Dr Sarah Cornell, an associate professor and principal researcher at SRC, said: âFor a long time, people have known that chemical pollution is a bad thing. But they havenât been thinking about it at the global level. This work brings chemical pollution, especially plastics, into the story of how people are changing the planet.ââ (credit to The Guardian)
Yeah. Iâll probably make a big post about this soon, so look for it.
Have a good day/night!
The more I talk about recycling with people the more I realise just how many people recycle backwards.
Hey OP what the fuck are you talking about?
What I mean is, when a lot of people plan to recycle, they look at stopping products from ending up in landfill. This is a completely pointless thing to worry about. Some materials do require special handling to dispose of safely (batteries, fragile plastics, etc.), but if your goal is a general âhow do I repurpose this so it doesnât end up in landfill?â, that solves absolutely nothing.
We arenât lacking in landfill space. The shirt in the back of your closet that you never ever wear is exactly as bad for the environment in the back of your closet as it is in landfill; storing it is just delaying the point in time at which itâll start to break down. If I buy something in a plastic bottle, and then repurpose that plastic bottle into a garden pot or something⌠that garden pot is still gonna go to landfill eventually. I havenât saved anything. The plastic was landfill as soon as it was manufactured. That shirt was landfill (unless you choose to burn it, which isnât environmentally any better) the moment the fabric was produced.
The critical point when it comes to making a difference with recycling isnât before stuff hits landfill; itâs before the stuff is produced in the first place. âReduce, reuse, recycleâ only works because âreuseâ and ârecycleâ are strategies to feed into âreduceâ. Recycling glass bottles or aluminium cans is useful only because it reduces the amount of new glass and aluminium being produced (note: most of the plastic bottles you recycle go straight to landfill in other countries). Recycling fabric is useful only if it prevents the purchase of new fabric, and thus on a large scale, the production of new fabric.
For example, letâs say my pants are threadbare beyond repair, and I cut them up for dusters. Important question: do I use dusters? Do I need this many dusters? Is this, in short, an act that is stopping me from buying dusters made from newly manufactured material? If itâs not, then itâs not doing anything at all to help the environment. That same amount of fabric is still going to landfill. (Thatâs not a reason not to do it, it just doesnât help the environment at all.)
Another example: I tend to cut up old clothes and pick up fabric thatâs going to be thrown out a lot, to make bags and wall hangings and rugs and things. I recycle a LOT of fabric. Is this helping the environment? For some people doing this, it probably is, because theyâre making stuff theyâd otherwise buy. But for me, itâs doing nothing whatsoever for the environment. If I wasnât making cushions and wall hangings, I wouldnât be buying any. I just wouldnât own any cushions or wall hangings. Theyâre fun to make, they brighten the place up, but they donât affect my consumption (and therefore the incentive for cushions and wall hanging to be produced) at all; Iâm buying zero of those things either way. Is this recycling? Yes. Does it have any effect whatsoever on helping the environment? No. Itâs just delaying the amount of time before that exact same fabric ends becomes rubbish.
Same is true of the aformentioned plastic bottles into garden pots. That plastic is going into landfill whether you recycle it first or not. The question is, did repurposing it stop you from having to buy plastic garden pots? Will the cumulative effect of people doing this lower the amount of plastic garden pots being produced? Will that lower the amount of plastic being produced?
Stopping things from reaching landfill is largely an irrelevant and pointless practice. Recycling is only environmentally useful when it affects the future production of materials. Repurposing materials is often fun and practical regardless (I love repurposing materials), but itâs not automatically environmentally useful just because youâre reusing something.
#This is one of the reasons I am OBSESSED with green building materials#because so many of them are actually not that green at all#and the concept of recycled building materials is so over used while being under examined#and BOY DO THEY HATE IT WHEN YOU POINT OUT THAT THEIR GREEN PRODUCT IS NOT REALLY THAT GREEN#omg it makes them so mad#them being architects or company reps etcÂ
Still fuming over that âvegan leather made from cacti!â thing that turned out to be almost entirely plastic with like, a bit of cactus in there.
This is mostly true except the assertion that âWe arenât lacking in landfill spaceâ, which I must disagree with, because we are. Every landfill means another habitat dug up, more hydrology altered, and unless theyâre properly constructed, a LOT of extremely harmful compounds entering the surrounding ecosystems via leachate. And itâs a particular problem if you live somewhere with a smaller landmass (e.g. UK, Iceland, Aotearoa, the Philippines, etc) - we are absolutely running out of landfill space, and anything that slows their filling IS a good thing.
But yes, itâs absolutely true that the behemoth in the room is our consumption patterns, and a lot of the green movement is just capitalism in a new colour. If we donât stop making all the stuff weâre making, the planet dies. It really is that simple.
Thatâs a good point. For context I am Australian.
Friendly reminder that capitalism mangled âreduce reuse recycleâ into just ârecycleâ for a reason. Corporations donât want to reduce consumption at all so theyâll gladly sell you the lie that if you recycle hard enough youâll save the environment. No amount of recycling will save shit if we do not reduce and reuse (and obliterate the capitalist system forcing us all into perpetual overconsumption)
Please read this post. Itâs very important.
Dusky Seaside Sparrow such as the one above went extinct in 1987. This species was threatened by dehabitization (loss of habitat) and a contaminated food chain, meaning that animals from other food chain got into its and basically disrupted the entire system. Continue for more facts about this sparrow.
WHY DOES EXTINCTION MATTER?
Pure-bred Columbia Basin Pygmy Rabbitâs like this one when completely extinct in 2008. This species was threatened by dehabitization (loss of habitat) (a form of climate change). Below are some facts about this rabbit.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Iâm going to start with endangered and extinct animals native to the USA and itâs surrounding regions. Most of these will be off the endangered species list. Posts will begin soon!
Hi everyone!
Did you know that without biodiversity life will not work any longer?
Biodiversity is the diversity of all the different types of animals and plants and insects in the biosphere. And guess what? By overfishing, poaching (guess what, thatâs one of the big ones!), polluting, and climate change (which we caused) weâre effectively destroying biodiversity.
In this blog I will talk about how weâre destroying biodiversity, and some of the most endangered animals and plants in the world.Â
Reblog, follow, like, or comment. The world is changing and we caused it to happen.