antinormal

PT: 1316: Anti-normal /end PT

DEFINITION ⦂⠀A stance that is anti-radnormal, due to being against radicalism AND pushing normativity.

PT: Definition: A stance that is anti-radnormal, due to being against radicalism AND pushing normativity. /end PT

The black and white have been swapped for light-to-dark greys, to symbolise nuance instead of extremes, the colours flipped to the face the opposite direction, and filtered to not be a replica of the radnormal flag.

A list of some things an antinormal opposes includes: allonormativity, amatonormativity, bigotry and discrimination, censorship, cisnormativity, cringe culture, harassment, heteronormativity, mononormativity, perinormativity, racism/colourism/xenophobia/etc. (yes, this counts under "bigotry and discrimination, but I know topics of race and culture tend to go unmentioned, so I think it deserves to be highlighted, not as different, but to not be forgotten amidst "more queer-centric" forms of bigotry and discrimination), radnormal/radqueer, T/SWERFism, transmedicalism.

A list of some things an antinormal supports includes: being "cringe" and free, "contradictory" labels like lesboy/bigay/FTF/etc., fetish/kink/paraphilia (not necessarily as "queer", but as partner communities which have helped one another), intersex, LGBT+/LIOM/MOGAI/NCWOB/QAI/etc., neopronouns, otherkin/adjacent, recovering in your own way and at your own pace, transandrophobia theory, xenogenders.

These lists may include more, per antinormal. You may assume that unmentioned stances are considered neutral, are viewed with more nuance, or vary per antinormal.

ADDITIONAL ⦂⠀Coined on the 19th of June, 2026.

PT: Additional: Coined on the 19th of June, 2026. /end PT

TAGGING ⦂⠀@c1rcus-of-silliness @dearestchild @goregender @radiomogai

Before I get to that, I just want to take a moment to appreciate this...

Yeah, no, that's actually genuinely pathetic and embarrassing.

If you can't handle being in your hate group without falling apart when it's called out, I'd suggest you leave.

Also, repeating again for the kana person that I'm NOT radqueer.

Anyway, this post led me to look more into the OP, where I found this and... WOW!

It is genuinely wild to be talking about wanting to "beat the shit" out of your younger siblings, and worse to say that the only reason you're not beating the shit out of them is because your parents won't let you.

OP is 16, so we can assume their youngest sibling is, at most, 14. Probably younger, but let's assume 14 for the most generous estimate, if their parents had one child per year.

Why do we need to know what a doctor said about these siblings' genitals at birth? If they're have brothers, say that.

Unless the point about them being AMAB is because of one or all of them no longer identifying as male, but st4rii still sees them as just "AMAB".

PT: 1316: Anti-normal /end PT

DEFINITION ⦂⠀A stance that is anti-radnormal, due to being against radicalism AND pushing normativity.

PT: Definition: A stance that is anti-radnormal, due to being against radicalism AND pushing normativity. /end PT

The black and white have been swapped for light-to-dark greys, to symbolise nuance instead of extremes, the colours flipped to the face the opposite direction, and filtered to not be a replica of the radnormal flag.

A list of some things an antinormal opposes includes: allonormativity, amatonormativity, bigotry and discrimination, censorship, cisnormativity, cringe culture, harassment, heteronormativity, mononormativity, perinormativity, racism/colourism/xenophobia/etc. (yes, this counts under "bigotry and discrimination, but I know topics of race and culture tend to go unmentioned, so I think it deserves to be highlighted, not as different, but to not be forgotten amidst "more queer-centric" forms of bigotry and discrimination), T/SWERFism, transmedicalism.

A list of some things an antinormal supports includes: being "cringe" and free, "contradictory" labels like lesboy/bigay/FTF/etc., fetish/kink/paraphilia (not necessarily as "queer", but as partner communities which have helped one another), intersex, LGBT+/LIOM/MOGAI/NCWOB/QAI/etc., neopronouns, otherkin/adjacent, recovering in your own way and at your own pace, transandrophobia theory, xenogenders.

These lists may include more, per antinormal. You may assume that unmentioned stances are considered neutral, are viewed with more nuance, or vary per antinormal.

ADDITIONAL ⦂⠀Coined on the 19th of June, 2026.

PT: Additional: Coined on the 19th of June, 2026. /end PT

TAGGING ⦂⠀@c1rcus-of-silliness @dearestchild @goregender @radiomogai

Will delete reblog if it's anti though.

I would say it's generally pro or neutral on most things, with the "cringe" and free sentiment, and an "as long no one's being *harmed" mindset.

I am a singlet, so it feels like either side may criticise Me if I take up one stance or the other.

This is after a blog formerly named radically-normal was excommunicated by an account called radnormal-clergy.

Screenshot from @sophies-filter

there's also this post where someone admits to being ableist and discriminatory towards paraphiles, and also threatens them. shelix also liked this post.

radnormal is not safe for paraphiles. i'd also argue it's not safe for disabled or disordered people either, considering those involved are apparently comfortable labeling themselves as ableists and discriminatory.

And, the "anti-harassment towards minors, neu-harassment towards adults" point, really just seems infantilising of minors, and obviously not compassionate to adults who may be "justifiably" bad, in the way they can "justify" minors doing the same thing.

Justify isn't quite right, when what I mean is understand why or how they ended up in something. Especially when they call it a "cult". The quiet part is that adults who were indoctrinated "should have known better" because "adults know better".

they treat minors as though they're incapable of doing anything wrong. like, i understand being more lenient because they're young and still developing and learning about the world, but it's entirely possible for minors to be abusers or predators and to cause harm to other people. a lot of csa actually happens between minors. sibling abuse is very real and also often happens between minors. someone being a minor isn't a free pass for them to do shitty things without any repercussions.

a point my partner brought up is that absolving minors of any harm they've caused can lead them to be harmful as an adult, and i agree, because nobody learns if they don't receive some sort of consequence for their actions. those consequences can be as simple as someone just telling them off and educating them. it doesn't have to be anything violent or drastic.

not to mention... all adults were minors at one point. i wonder what their stance is on adults who were groomed into the radqueer community as a minor? radqueer as a term has existed since at least 2021, so it's entirely possible.

Screenshot from @sophies-filter

there's also this post where someone admits to being ableist and discriminatory towards paraphiles, and also threatens them. shelix also liked this post.

radnormal is not safe for paraphiles. i'd also argue it's not safe for disabled or disordered people either, considering those involved are apparently comfortable labeling themselves as ableists and discriminatory.

And, the "anti-harassment towards minors, neu-harassment towards adults" point, really just seems infantilising of minors, and obviously not compassionate to adults who may be "justifiably" bad, in the way they can "justify" minors doing the same thing.

Justify isn't quite right, when what I mean is understand why or how they ended up in something. Especially when they call it a "cult". The quiet part is that adults who were indoctrinated "should have known better" because "adults know better".