#anti-normal

PT: 1316: Anti-normal /end PT

DEFINITION ⦂⠀A stance that is anti-radnormal, due to being against radicalism AND pushing normativity.

PT: Definition: A stance that is anti-radnormal, due to being against radicalism AND pushing normativity. /end PT

The black and white have been swapped for light-to-dark greys, to symbolise nuance instead of extremes, the colours flipped to the face the opposite direction, and filtered to not be a replica of the radnormal flag.

A list of some things an antinormal opposes includes: allonormativity, amatonormativity, bigotry and discrimination, censorship, cisnormativity, cringe culture, harassment, heteronormativity, mononormativity, perinormativity, racism/colourism/xenophobia/etc. (yes, this counts under "bigotry and discrimination, but I know topics of race and culture tend to go unmentioned, so I think it deserves to be highlighted, not as different, but to not be forgotten amidst "more queer-centric" forms of bigotry and discrimination), radnormal/radqueer, T/SWERFism, transmedicalism.

A list of some things an antinormal supports includes: being "cringe" and free, "contradictory" labels like lesboy/bigay/FTF/etc., fetish/kink/paraphilia (not necessarily as "queer", but as partner communities which have helped one another), intersex, LGBT+/LIOM/MOGAI/NCWOB/QAI/etc., neopronouns, otherkin/adjacent, recovering in your own way and at your own pace, transandrophobia theory, xenogenders.

These lists may include more, per antinormal. You may assume that unmentioned stances are considered neutral, are viewed with more nuance, or vary per antinormal.

ADDITIONAL ⦂⠀Coined on the 19th of June, 2026.

PT: Additional: Coined on the 19th of June, 2026. /end PT

TAGGING ⦂⠀@c1rcus-of-silliness @dearestchild @goregender @radiomogai

Screenshot from @sophies-filter

Just a reminder that people can agree on some things and disagree on other things.

We have not been in talks about "transautistic" or radqueer discourse, only uniting for our shared distaste toward radnormals.

This is a fallacy meant to create a bias against the other, so that the "audience" views the opposite argument negatively, while not making a strong point on for their own side.

Because HOW do you possibly see someone make a death threat, then say "watch the one who got threatened "whine" about being threatened in a post directly tagging her", when you pretend to be soooo critical of those in your movement who you decide aren't sympathetic enough about suicide?

That isn't to say the second criticism is wrong. In fact, be as exclusive of unsympathetic people as you want to. But don't be a fucking hypocrite. Don't be unsympathetic yourself.

In the same way that not all laws are moral; such as the illegality of queerness in certain places, and not all morals are laws; such as cheating not being illegal, as an exercise of autonomy, though it is frowned upon for good reason.