man door hand hook car door

A+ THAT IS HOW YOU FUCK WITH PEOPLE

@ all girls coming to terms w not being straight: i love u, i am proud of u, there is nothing gross or wrong about liking/loving other girls and u are brave and valid and good

Aces: *looks into the camera like we are on the office*

hey did u know there are ace wlw and this post applies to them too…not a hard concept to grasp :+)

me: it’s okay for girls to like girls some irrelevant person who i don’t follow: just a reminder that it’s also okay for girls not to like girls you lesbian b*tch

I love this 😂

I have done this. It is IMMENSELY satisfying.

Yes, lgbt literally means lesbian, gay, bi, and trans, but you’re missing the last few letters, pal. One of which is a, for, unsurprisingly, ace. Nice try tho.

Sorry to brake it to you hun but us ace’s are.

actually, if you don’t fight homophobia (or any variation of) or transphobia (or any variation of) you aren’t lgbtpn!! this community was built on the basis of fighting cishet oppression so no cishets allowed sorry yall

Full offense but y'all asexual is about as much an orientation as hypersexual. They are essentially the exact same thing except on opposite ends. They are not describing your overall attraction and orientation they are describing your feelings towards the act of sex itself The split attraction model is shit and does nothing but sexualize orientations for no reason. The -sexual suffix in heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual and pansexual have always meant sex as in gender not sex as in fucking. Stop trying to rewrite definitions so you can feel fucking special. Asexual heterosexual isn’t illogical, yall demanding that we split hairs on attraction so you can use queer as a quirky title is illogical and disgusting as fuck I’m so done with this

he lived with a man for a good decade so

my physics teacher in highschool and college physics prof both talked about how he had a forbidden love w his pal fatio lmao

wow physics and calculus are gay pass it on

Christian history preferred to mis-remember him as a “pure” virgin than as the “sinful” homo he truly was.

i definitely thought this was going to turn into ace discourse lmao

I like that she isn’t wearing the dress in the last picture because I think on some level she realized how flimsy her argument was. The false equivalence falls apart because what happens if she puts on pants? Is she no longer a woman? Gender is performative, Susan, on some level you know and so, you didn’t wear the dress.