- the first and hopefully only -
I'm feeling... 'politically charged' today after hearing a particularly sickening rant about immigration. This will be my first time up on a political soapbox, but I don't confine what I say in this journal to a particular subject so I doubt I'll come to regret it.
I have always considered myself moderate in the affairs of the Church, and moderate in social politics. Rolling my eyes and remaining uninvolved on Sundays when Catholic traditionalists let loose their long-winded rants on why divorcees and 'the Satanic gays' should be restricted from communion, or why the novus ordo should be banned and any language but Latin made illegal during Mass... as well as the equally long-winded rants from Catholic progressives on why hell doesn't actually exist and why Pope Francis has been hinting at it for years but cannot outright say it due to 'the institution'.
I can't say I've met any Satanic gay people, nor can I fathom this mysterious institution that somehow gags the Pope.
In the political landscape, conservatives are the majority for pro-life policies, but also the majority for the death penalty and the cutting of welfare programs. Liberals tend to be overwhelmingly pro-abortion, yet vastly oppose the death penalty. Meanwhile, I wonder why one side cares more about life before birth, while the other cares more about life after birth. Why not combine the two into a comprehensive policy supporting life from conception to old age? ...but I suppose that would be too reasonable for the world of American politics.
My point in all this is that I tend to not identify with either majority, trying to avoid the flaws of both crowds in this national (or in the case of Catholicism, international) game of tug-of-war. My bias has always leaned towards the Jesuits, who have a moderately liberal approach to spirituality while holding to decently conservative values - without that lens of bigotry that the conservative movement in America is usually known for, or that lens of 'intolerant tolerance' that the liberal movement in America is usually known for.
But it is difficult to remain truly neutral when political talk starts seeping into one's church, as it always does when the political climate around us grows more heated than its usual level of ‘slightly simmering’.
The ICE and the treatment of migrant families has been a major focus in the news lately, stirring up feverish rants from both sides. The more I read about it, the more bothered I become. The atrocities in the detention camps, the suppression of basic human rights... pregnant women are denied medical care, shackled around their bellies, and abused to the point of miscarrying. Migrant children have been separated from their families and placed in temporary homes, only to be lost in the system.
It is absolutely horrifying.
I try to avoid the news media outside of the few Jesuit news sources I read, and given their respect of human life, said stories always lean towards condemning the ICE and calling for the Church as a whole to stand up against these abuses.
...just as equally horrifying is the fact that so many Catholics don't. The Church in America doesn't stand up for it, in fact, some Catholics even support it. Supporting Trump. Supporting 'the wall'. Ignoring what happens to the innocent in the name of stopping terrorism or saving money. Reading about this beyond the comforts of my Jesuit friends, hearing other parishioners give their thumbs up... I don't even know how to react to them. How do you respond to people who say "They're trying to have anchor babies anyway, call it justice they're being forced to miscarry. One less drain on the system." but with stunned silence?
To the same people who once spoke out for those like Alfie Evans? Who spoke out against the practices of abortion clinics?
It would take me some time to think of something more evil and vile than trying to kill babies before birth for the sole reason of keeping them from becoming American citizens. What an absolute playground for Satan.
In this case, their true colors show and I fall off to one side of the great tug-of-war. Being pro-life should not be conditional to the family being white or legal. Being pro-life should mean seeing in every human being the light that marks them as a child of God. Not to drown that innocence, but embrace it. Nurture it from conception to old age.
I continue to sit in church next to these people, not really bothering to change my typical pew spot no matter how upset their opinions make me, because I know the Church is not a sanctuary for the healthy, but a hospital for the sick... and if anyone is in need of God's healing mercy, it is the sort of people who hold this much hate in their hearts. Hate not only for those migrant families they've never even met, but for those innocent unborn lives who do not yet know of things like political borders and skin color. Lives ended prematurely because of bigotry and blindly following a president who is - unsurprisingly - as dishonest about holding a pro-life stance as he is about everything else.
Let us always recall another family of refugees fleeing their land with an unborn child in tow, and a king who was fine with seeing many infants dead because he felt they were threats to his country. It is a family that Catholics should all know very well.
Let us also recall that the Virgin Mary, in her title of Our Lady of Guadalupe, is the protectress of the unborn. I feel that our brothers and sisters in faith should be reminded of that.















