I have mixed thoughts on sex work. I love sex, but I hate work!
âYeah, we hate seeing you work too!â
how does this post keep getting better
$LAYYYTER
The Bowery Presents
Jules of Nature
Sweet Seals For You, Always
𩵠avery cochrane đŠľ

blake kathryn
we're not kids anymore.
Show & Tell

gracie abrams

tannertan36
Claire Keane
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă

romaâ
đ
cherry valley forever
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
hello vonnie
sheepfilms

shark vs the universe

seen from Netherlands
seen from South Africa
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Suriname

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Maldives
@acaderama
I have mixed thoughts on sex work. I love sex, but I hate work!
âYeah, we hate seeing you work too!â
how does this post keep getting better

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
This June, I need Gen Z queers to understand that some people are closeted.
I am saying this as a Gen Z queer, before yâall get your guns out to fucking shoot me.
But I need yâall to understand that if someone doesnât give you their government name in a queer space, itâs not because theyâre âmysterious,â and you do not have permission to take it upon yourself to figure out their âreal identityâ and go digging for them online like a private investigator. First, thatâs creepy and a violation of privacy and reasonable boundaries. Second, some of us keep our private and professional lives very separate because we need to keep food on the fucking table and a roof over our heads, and our private life could jeopardize that.
âWhy wonât you tell me about your parents?â âWhy canât I know your real name?â âWhere do you work?â
1.) Not all our parents would bake us a fucking cake when we come out. Some of us are closeted. Surely you understand this? You also do not need to know my parentâs names or occupations; we are both adults. I do not need nor want to mix you and my private life with my parents and my public life.
2.) Trans people do not owe you their dead name or government name
3.) Iâm not telling you for the sake of job security. I am a government fucking caseworker working amidst a fucking lavender panic!
âThereâs no way youâre a different person outside this; youâre still you at your core. What harm is thereââ
No, I am a completely different person. A different person with a different personality and different interests and a different name and presentation. I am a completely different person because I keep this life and my public life private to avoid fracturing 90% of my interpersonal relationships and 100% of my professional ones.
âYouâre not out? But youâre so confident.â
Seeâ thatâs part of the issue. Yâall assume someone is in the closet because they hate themselves or lack self-identity. Some of us know exactly who we are, but need to prioritize financial stability or else our entire life gets exponentially harder immediately.
You meet queer people over the age of 40 and one of the first/earliest questions is âwho knows?â
I need yâall to start bringing that energy. Because itâs not always safe for someone to be out and not everyone is safe to be out around.
There is a misnomer that âthe closetâ inherently means âdoesnât know theyâre queerâ and not âisnât out widely and publicly.â âOutnessâ is often a patchwork.
Since Iâm a REAL pro, I mistakenly deleted my commissions info so here I am đĽ˛
For any more info, my DMs are open and I would L O V E to chit chat about your ideas âĽď¸
I would really appreciate if you could share this post so more people can see it!
shane hollander is not homophobic. haydenâs pretty sure. solidly 85% sure. mostly very sure. heâs a good dude! he never makes those types of jokes and he has a gay friend, some figure skater he grew up with, and he had recently told rose that while heâd never seen the movie moonlight, he knew it won a lot of awards. so yeah. shane hollander is not homophobic.
but then. okay, a few years ago, hayden had asked if shane wanted to go to pride with him and jackie. shane had said no. no big deal. shane says no to most invites to loud, sweaty, places where he might have to say hi to fan or eat processed food.
shane hollander is not homophobic.
then again. shane hollander never fights. he certainly doesnât instigate. but he had. he had swung on scott hunter after the end of play. at the time, hayden had asked shane why he picked a fight with scott hunter of all people (a lot of people called shane boring & uptight. hayden had always thought this was really unfair because shane was secretly very funny. he just didnât like strangers. as far as hayden could tell, hunter was actually boring & uptight, but he got away with it because his play was so inconsistent it gave the illusion of him being interesting).
so the fight was weird. what was weirder, is how shane bristled and mumbled something about the fight being âpersonalâ and âthe principle of the thing.â hayden chalked it all up to stress. until now, as he sits, listening to scott hunter accept his mvp award, as the first out gay NHL player.
hayden is not a fix-it guy. he could probably fix things, but jackie & shane are consumate control freaks, so heâs more of a follow-the-explicit-directions-of-his-loved-ones-like-heâs-escaping-a-saw-trap guy. telling jackie about the âhomophobic shane thingâ is a non-starter, because she is barely post-partum and he thinks jackie may actually put him in a saw trap if he explains the âgay (straight) figure skater thing.â and telling shane. well.
so hayden has to be the fix-it guy.
hayden has not been sleeping well. itâs about 20% the âhomophobic shane thingâ and 80% the ânewborn baby thing.â heâs not fully losing his mind, but he must have momentarily misplaced his frontal lobe, because he had asked for ilya rosanovâs number before he had even thought to try talking to shane directly.
shane, apparently, was on a âsilent retreat.â if hayden was less of an ally, he would think thatâs an awfully gay activity for a homophobe. alas, hayden had recently added call me by your name to his and jackieâs movie night list, so he does not find any irony in shane stewing in homophobic gay silence.
instead, he opens his phone and calls.
LAST PART I PROMISE :)
âda?â comes over the speaker before the second ring.
âhi. uhh. itâs hayden pike. i got your number from, well it doesnât matter, i got your number.â
ââŚuh-huhâŚand why is hayden pike, montreals 15th best player calling me?â he announces it all louder than necessary. hayden imagines him as a middle school thespian, cheating out to the audience.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
CANNOT take credit for these, my sister in law made them. Behold.
i need this completed or ill die who is kitty?? WHO IS LYDIA
@scyllas-revenge this has your name written all over it. twice.
Ahh my two favorite things smushed together!!
as op of this post this had me laughing truly out loud @scyllas-revenge
my bro in law: I hope they fold their gowns properly
Are your characters fucking in spite of The Horrors, or are they fucking because of The Horrors?
There is a third thing to consider.
4x09 lancelot they will never make me hate you
Desperate times call for desperate measures... Wing-it's are now 30% off simply so I can feed myself, my partner, and my furbabies. If you can't purchase can you please at least share so I can find someone looking for my kind of detailed handmade art (No AI). http://vgen.co/MeaKitty or http://Ko-fi.com/MeaKitty

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Mad about politics again
*Mutual reblogs something you posted*
Me: They still like me. Thank God.
reblog this post to let the mutual you reblogged this from know that you still like them
Reblog to make prev 10% hotter and more evil
(Source: Sen the donkey)
Reblog if you think the person you reblogged this from deserves to be happy.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
magic â sword. magic is a tool. and frankly the persistent insistence (looking at you, Uther Pendragon, and by unfortunate narrative inheritance, Arthur) on treating it as though it is inherently a blade is less a moral truth and more a failure of imagination (and, not to be petty, but also a failure of governance).
because hereâs the thing: a sword is designed to harm. that is its telos (yes, weâre doing philosophy about a saturday night fantasy show, keep up). you can hang it on a wall, you can ceremonialize it, you can even pass it down as a symbolâbut its function remains violence. when you call magic a sword, you are making a claim about its essence: that harm is not an accident of misuse but its natural, inevitable endpoint.
which isâŚa wild claim, given what we actually see.
enter Merlin (patron saint of âthis could have been an email,â except the email is a spell and the recipient is destiny). what does he use magic for, on a day-to-day basis? half the time itâs chores. itâs quietly preventing catastrophe while also, somehow, still having to polish Arthurâs boots (which is a separate injustice we donât have time to unpack fully, though rest assured it rankles).
magic, in practice, behaves far more like a toolbox.
and tools are morally inert. a hammer can build a house or break a window (or, if youâre particularly unlucky, hit your thumb; morality does not enter into it, only regret). an axe can fell a tree or be weaponized, but we do not, as a society, declare axes ontologically evil and execute carpenters on sight (one hopes). to collapse all possible uses into the worst-case scenario is not prudence
uther voice: âbut magic has caused harm before!â yes, and so has literally every technology, skill, and form of knowledge humanity has ever developed. fire burned down a village once; we did not outlaw warmth.
âmagic is a swordâ camp leans heavily on historical harm as evidence of inherent corruption. but correlation is not causation, and more importantly, context matters. if magic users are hunted, persecuted, and executed, what behaviors are you incentivizing? secrecy. desperation. retaliation. you are, quite literally, manufacturing the very threat you claim to be containing.
violence by magic users, in that framework, starts to look less like proof of innate evil and more like the predictable outcome of systemic oppression (funny how that works, across genres and centuries alike). if every avenue for benign use is criminalized, then the only magic that remains visible is the kind wielded in extremis. and thenâsurpriseâyou point to that extremity as justification for further crackdowns. a perfect, self-sustaining loop of bad decisions.
thereâs also an epistemic issue here: focusing exclusively on harmful uses produces a distorted dataset. if you only record instances where magic goes wrong, you will inevitably conclude that magic always goes wrong. meanwhile, all the beneficial uses go uncounted because they leave no spectacle behind. itâs a kind of narrative survivorship bias
the âtoolboxâ perspective insists on a more capacious view. magic is not one thing; it is many things. it scales with the intent, skill, and circumstance of the user. to regulate it as though it were a singular, inherently violent object is intellectually lazy.
(which, again, not to harp on it, but if your entire policy framework can be summarized as âban it because itâs scary,â you are not exactly winning awards for nuanced statecraft.)
none of this is to say magic canât be dangerous. of course it can. so can swords, and storms, and politics (especially politics). but danger is not the same as destiny. a thingâs capacity for harm does not define its essence; otherwise we would have to condemn half the world into moral exile, starting with the nearest kitchen knife.
so when Arthur inherits his fatherâs fear (with a slightly more conflicted expression, granted, but still), what heâs really inheriting is a category error. magic is not a sword to be sheathed or shattered. itâs a system profoundly shaped by the hands that wield it.
and maybe if those hands werenât constantly forced into hiding, theyâd have a lot more room to build something other than the very threats everyone is so busy dreading.
Character duo where one *remembers I donât like fitting characters into trope boxes* is a completely fleshed out and realised person *remembers treating characters as real people and not story devices written with intent is bad* who is written by the author and *remembers death of the author* uh. And *fumbles and drops my pile of queue cards* ah fuck wait no *the menacing horse* what was that.