The first time someone recommended Stormlight Archive to me, I had thought the series was completed. In fact, I feel like I distinctly recall them saying that it was done, but neglecting to mention that it was just the first arc that was done. Well, I didn't learn about this until I think around book three and at that point I figured I'll just finish the whole thing.
Now funnily enough, this same person had thought that I had read Mistborn. I have not. This is in fact my first Sanderson novel, and it's funny because I've heard a lot about Sanderson in varying fashions. I've heard great things about him, but I'll always remember what one friend said about him and that he's the "McDonalds of grand fantasy".
Having finished the first arc, in some ways I actually get where they're coming from. But before I continue I just want to say that I DID like the series, otherwise there's no way I would've made my way through practically 6000+ pages of it.
I guess to give some background on where I'm coming from, I was a big Lord of the Rings fan when I was younger, I've read Game of Thrones (well, books 1-5, haven't read the side stuff), read the Kingkiller chronicle (book three anytime now right), and various other grand fantasy books throughout the years (another series that I'm reading on and off is Discworld). A lot of this was in the past though, and what I will say after reading Stormlight Archive is that I realized that… Grand fantasy may not be for me. Or well, some aspects of it to be specific.
Specifically in the way that I realized what I really like about stories and writing is generally the themes and the way the characters evolve throughout the book. So a lot of the time when a series gets very deep into grand setup and politicking and setting up alliances and factions I find myself not that interested. This is not saying that it's not done well or anything, and I still enjoy it to a degree, it's just not the thing that I enjoy the most. The grand set ups, the large expansive lores, the huge world, I acknowledge that it's interesting and I know that people like it, it's just not generally for me.
It's funny because I almost initially wrote that I didn't like world building, but that's not exactly true. I don't know the best way to describe it, but I almost like it when there's attention paid to details that would otherwise not be thought about. For example, and you can call me cringe for bringing up manga into a conversation about books, Shinozaki-kun no Mente Jijou brings up a lot of interesting ideas about their world of magicians that I really like. There's also a manga called Ryuu to Yuusha to Haitatsunin that is written by a historian nerd and it really shows in the world (town?) building of his setting. Maybe it's that I like town building? I don't know honestly, there's just something fun to me about the whimsical nature of exploring the idea of how to calculate taxes or how certain laws or precedents exist for certain things you wouldn't normally think of
Anyways, I'm digressing. Back to the topic on hand.
This is all to say (as usual spoiler warning) a lot of the talk of the greater cosmere and the other worlds, I actually didn't care that much for them. I was much more invested in the main character's journeys that when they would make mentions or explaining about the fate of the cosmere, I just wasn't that invested. Some of the historical world building scenes I wasn't as invested in either. That's not to say it's bad of course! I think the grand scale is cool and absolutely get why people would like it.
Now what I did enjoy and why I kept reading is that I really liked the character's in the series… mostly. I think Sanderson does a really good job of having good character voices despite balancing a bunch of different perspectives. I initially had middling opinions on a lot of the characters, including the main ones like Kaladin, but I did end up growing to like them.
But I have to comment, I think I can understand where my friend was coming from. While I think McDonalds is a very harsh term, in a lot of ways, I think Sanderson is very… solid. Not exceptional or mind blowing, but very solid and foundationally good. I wouldn't call his characters generic necessarily, yet its hard for me to say that anything that happened to them was mindblowing or like a huge "woah" factor for me. They're great though and I still found myself really liking the payoffs!
And I think that's where I had my biggest overall complaint with the series. I obviously cannot speak to Sanderson's other works, but each book felt very almost formulaic with how I felt when reading it. There would be a significant portion of each book where I'm okay, until it finally feels like everything comes to a head and wham! I'm like yeah, this is why I'm reading these books! I wouldn't normally consider this a problem as every book has a pace and I don't mind slower reads, but when it's done for each book where each book is over a 1000 pages it can get a little grating at times.
Where this feels noticeable for me is the way things are paced and the perspectives are spread out. This is another part for where I'm just okay on in grand fantasy. I personally don't really like the constant jumping around between perspectives. I like having a more concentrated focus that keeps the work scoped, as opposed to having this much larger scoped. Again, personal preference.
But it was practically frustrating how frequent it felt like you'd read the story in ABCDEABCDEABCDE fashion. You'd get inches of progress in each section, and the worst offender to me was when during some of these sections it felt like we were replaying character arcs or retreading previously tread over information. There was a very big tendency to do "here's what happened" then later "okay now you can see it happen" and while yes, I think there's value in seeing details, the constant repetition of it and the way it broke up the flow of the story was bothersome for me. One particular painpoint of this for me was Venli's past in book four, where it felt like we were constantly in very serious situations while the tower was occupied then we'd be reading a chapter about the human and listeners meeting again.
Also one particular character's major arc that frustrated me was Shallan's. It felt like it took forever and there was constant moments of Shallan going "I'm scared of my past" and dancing around the topic. I wouldn't have minded it as much if again, it didn't feel like we jumped back and forth and then jumped back to Shallan who would talk again about her mysterious past that she didn't want to remember and then we'd maybe get a snippet of it or jump away only to jump back later.
So I think overall the series could've been edited down to be at least better paced in some aspects. There were some repetitive character arcs that while I kinda "get", it still could feel drab to read through.
Thankfully, the payoffs are generally worth it. I especially found the payoffs in books three to five extremely good, wrapping up major parts of a character's arcs felt extremely satisfying. Each Ideal sworn was a very powerful moment and I enjoyed those a lot. If I had to say my favourite moments… I think Kaladin swearing the fourth ideal where he accepts there are those he cannot protect was very good, and I really liked Dalinar swearing the third Ideal where he accepts responsibility for his actions. His quote that the most important step is not the first, but the next, is really good too. Might be one of my favourite scenes in the series honestly.
As a whole too, I think the character arcs that each character goes through is really well done. I really liked how Kaladin, Dalinar, and Shallan have their own sort of way of coping with the past. Shallan chooses to tell lies to herself. Kaladin gets consumed by it. Dalinar erases his mistakes. And each of them coming to terms with their past mistakes and bearing it in their own way is very powerful. Again, that's probably why I liked the Dalinar scene so much because it felt like a very powerful scene where he refuses to give his pain away like he had in the past. I'd even say that the idea of loss, regret, is a pretty central theme to the entire story. The Heralds if anything are all about regret and loss.
Adolin's was another character arc that I liked, though his was mostly in book five I felt where he realized how his place in the world had shifted. How he didn't have to be this ideal, and that most importantly (the scene I liked the most), sometimes trying your best was good enough.
In general, I think when Sanderson delivers, he delivers very well. To say it in a more modern way, the hype moments and aura are really good! Another part that I really liked in book five was when Taln fought back, despite not getting a detailed description of how he fought, I thought him waking up and the line "And for the first time in over four thousand years, the Bearer of Agonies fought back" went incredibly hard.
On another sort of tangent though, finishing these long books made me think about the importance of endings in media. I think it's rather common for something to be known by how strong the ending is because well, it's the last part that you interact with. A weak ending could even taint the story, or even series. The example I always think of is Mass Effect 3 which I had the opportunity to play again a while ago. Not to get too into the weeds on it but I actually enjoyed that game a lot and remember thinking "why did everyone hate this?" and then I got to the literal last hour of the game and went "oh right this part".
As someone who's read VNs too, I think this is also a common trend amongst some VNs that feel like they drag and drag and drag until the ending bits and then suddenly wow, it's one of the greatest things ever! Not calling out any VN in particular, but I think there's a reason why there's a reputation for "don't worry, it only takes forty hours to get good" exists (which also applies to long RPGs too).
Tying this back to the Stormlight Archive, the last quarter to third of each book I thought was always good. Threads start tying together again, the pacing gets tighter, and the events start wrapping up. Does it necessarily justify what I consider poor pacing in the earlier parts? In general, does the greatest ending you've ever experienced justify weaker earlier parts?
After many years of reading, playing, watching, and in general experiencing media, I'd like to say no. Not that Stormlight Archive was nearly so bad, but there are moments that made me put down the book without really being motivated to continue. Again, every now and then, it's not so bad. But repeat it five times with each book across 1000+ pages each and it gets a little tiresome.
It's like… I can see the structure of the book, and the middle parts feel like they're just there to get to the end. I don't want to get into the weeds about how I felt some plot points felt kinda iffy to me and I wasn't a fan of (particularly some of the contractual/political stuff) since it felt like a tool/vessel just to get to the conclusion.
I do want to say though that this is NOT to say that I think everything should be all gas gas gas. That isn't good pacing either! And I don't like those stories either! I just think build up and set up should be done carefully and with purpose beyond sometimes just for the sake of writing it and getting to a conclusion. It just feels worse the longer something overall is. I also absolutely would never ever want to get like a "digest" version of only the "good" parts, as I think that's horrible. I still think about the time a family friend once told me that they had watched Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul on Tiktok and it was better because it was only the good parts. I don't think I've ever been so hurt in my entire life hearing a sentence like that.
In some cases, I'd actually say that a story being slow and consistent can also be very well paced. One of my favourite, if not my absolute favourite, VN is Seabed, which is a slow read throughout. There is no dramatic reveals, and while there are moments of tension, it's consistent throughout. And I love it, so so so very much. But I won't talk about it here.
Looking at my word count I realized I really rambled on and on for a while. I guess reading a long fantasy series would do that, but maybe something could be said that probably a third of this if not more wasn't even about the books lol… Well regardless, I did enjoy my time with them. I'm glad that more than anything Sanderson is at least writing. I enjoyed the character themes and stories, and honestly my only gripe is that it feels like sometimes that there was a word quota he had to hit no matter what.