Past The Edge of Reason

Took Four out for a evening swim and a check over at the reef. Went for a paddle and had some absolutely gorgeous visitors come to say hello 🦈

I've been attending the meetings out of curiosity; I hear the restaurant's music sometimes, but I'm far enough away that it doesn't actually bother me. I rarely go out at night, so I hadn't encountered the "nuisance" aspects of it, which include lots of loitering drunk people, mysterious box trucks with no license plates blocking bike lanes while unloading, and bouncers swearing and trying to stop and frisk people walking past the restaurant.

("Why does a restaurant have bouncers?" you ask. Well, one of the complaints was "He's operating a nightclub but just using a restaurant license to do it.")

Anyway, I was intrigued to attend the latest video call because last time ONE DERANGED PERSON got on the line and spent ten minutes telling everyone else that the place is fine and if it isn't nobody cares and if you do you're a narc. I wanted to see if they were gonna come back to rant again and they did, but they got stymied by the moderator, who insisted that if you wanted to talk you had to "raise your hand" in the video call and they clearly couldn't figure out how to do that.

But then. After the airing of grievances and the owner's lawyer apologizing for no-showing at the last meeting, the alderman's spokesperson got on the line. FIFTY MINUTES into a one hour meeting, she said, "Before you inform the owner about the steps he needs to take to prevent this from becoming a legal issue, the Alderman has a question. He understands that the building landlord has served the owner with an eviction notice for the business, and we'd like to know if you and your client are aware of this?"

Every visible face on the video call did a jaw drop. It was awesome. I was muted and I still went "OooooohOOOOOOHHHHH!"

So yeah turns out the owner is "a little behind on the rent" but is confident he can bounce back, and then the moderator gave him a list of twenty things he needed to do (or not do) to fix the non-rent-related problems, two of which were "Stop doing unlicensed bottle service" and "No sparklers indoors".

I knew the one deranged person defending the restaurant's activities had to be known to the owner and they are.

At the start of the call I was disconcerted to find that while I tried to go to the CAPS meeting yesterday and nobody showed, it's clear from the call today that it did happen and the situation did get discussed. Presumably they just changed location, but I can't find a time or location for that specific beat meeting on any of the municipal calendars, including the Ward calendar, the CPD calendar, or the City calendar, so I'm still very confused.

A lot of the problem in the call today is that the owner kept asserting certain rights per his permits and plan -- what the tabletop RPG community would call Rules Lawyering. He's been asked to close at 10pm (so that the loud music will stop), but he's licensed to be open until 2am, so why can't he host private events from 10 to 2, that sort of thing. Which...I mean he's not wrong. It is unfair to make him close if he has the legal right to be open and the BACP could request that he just keep the music down. But he's going to get his permits yanked and lose those rights if he keeps pissing off the community. (OR SO I THOUGHT before I found out who Caller 17 was. Now I have no idea.) And a new problem is that people are parking in a privately-owned lot nearby and then afterpartying there past 2am. The police can't do a ton because it's not "drinking on the public way", they're on private property, and the BACP hasn't been able to make the lot's owner do anything about it. It sounds like they haven't been able to reach the lot's owner, to be honest.

One of the major complaints the community has had is that it's technically a restaurant but it's realistically operating as a nightclub; Caller 17 actually called it a club during this meeting, and some of the angrier community members jumped on that during the Airing of Grievances, saying "Look, even this person involved with the restaurant is calling it a club, and it's not licensed to be a club and we also don't want a nightclub in the middle of our neighborhood." There was much frustrated amusement when Caller 17 eventually responded that they don't go to nightclubs and they were referring to it as a club because they consider it a supper club.

I feel for the people who are genuinely suffering from this misbehavior, like there are people who just leave their homes on the weekends because the music at night is so loud it shakes their building. This process is likely going to drag on for a while and that's really rough for them. But at the same time, it's such a fascinating spectacle.

I may miss the next meeting -- while Hodag has also been attending the meetings, we'll be together and on the road at that point, and neither of us like distractions while we're driving. But I've looped Friend A into the madness now so possibly she can take notes.

I've been attending the meetings out of curiosity; I hear the restaurant's music sometimes, but I'm far enough away that it doesn't actually bother me. I rarely go out at night, so I hadn't encountered the "nuisance" aspects of it, which include lots of loitering drunk people, mysterious box trucks with no license plates blocking bike lanes while unloading, and bouncers swearing and trying to stop and frisk people walking past the restaurant.

("Why does a restaurant have bouncers?" you ask. Well, one of the complaints was "He's operating a nightclub but just using a restaurant license to do it.")

Anyway, I was intrigued to attend the latest video call because last time ONE DERANGED PERSON got on the line and spent ten minutes telling everyone else that the place is fine and if it isn't nobody cares and if you do you're a narc. I wanted to see if they were gonna come back to rant again and they did, but they got stymied by the moderator, who insisted that if you wanted to talk you had to "raise your hand" in the video call and they clearly couldn't figure out how to do that.

But then. After the airing of grievances and the owner's lawyer apologizing for no-showing at the last meeting, the alderman's spokesperson got on the line. FIFTY MINUTES into a one hour meeting, she said, "Before you inform the owner about the steps he needs to take to prevent this from becoming a legal issue, the Alderman has a question. He understands that the building landlord has served the owner with an eviction notice for the business, and we'd like to know if you and your client are aware of this?"

Every visible face on the video call did a jaw drop. It was awesome. I was muted and I still went "OooooohOOOOOOHHHHH!"

So yeah turns out the owner is "a little behind on the rent" but is confident he can bounce back, and then the moderator gave him a list of twenty things he needed to do (or not do) to fix the non-rent-related problems, two of which were "Stop doing unlicensed bottle service" and "No sparklers indoors".

I knew the one deranged person defending the restaurant's activities had to be known to the owner and they are.

@whumperless-whump-event Day Nine: Dropping Like Flies: Multiple whumpees / Caretaking while sick or injured / "I'll get some rest soon, I promise." Thunderbirds. Scott, John, Virgil, Gordon, Alan & Lucy Tracy. 100 words.

~

Gordon brought it home. He gave it to Alan. Who shared it with Scott. Who passed it to Virgil. John wasn’t going to be left out.

Soon Lucy had all of her boys out with the flu. She wasn’t too well herself, but that didn’t matter.

She checked on them continuously, plying them with meds.

‘Mom – cough-cough – you need to rest. You’re sick it too.’ ‘I’ll get some rest soon, I promise Scooter.’

But she didn’t. Couldn’t.

And then Scott dragged himself out of bed to find her slumped on the kitchen floor.

‘Mom? cough-cough Mom!’

🐾🤍🥣

Promo alert: If you’d like to adopt one of my little kitties, you can visit my print shop here: https://www.purrin.ink

Are you happy with it?

^^^^^^

https://wheelofnames.com/5k9-xsu

"With genetic test results back from U.C. Davis Laboratories of toe-hair samples from each side of his body, I am excited to share that this sheep

🌟 IS INDEED a CHIMERA 🌟

His black mouflon side is a genetically different individual from his black gray side. The lab ran the test twice just to be sure!

Oh but wait, THERE IS MORE!

He is ALSO a she!

The black mouflon side is male.

The black gray side is female!

What I can tell you beyond these test results, is that this beautiful creature successfully bred four solid patterned ewes this winter that produced a total of 9 lambs, of which all were either solid pattern or mouflon pattern; 5 rams and 4 ewes. "