we're talking about a large company who made a bunch of public statements as part of a lobbying push, hoping to hobble their foreign competition, and is now probably going to have those statements thrown in their face in court. domestic abuse is not the appropriate framing for this situation
the thing is that I am also an Anthropic fangirl and I think we could do a lot worse as companies that might eat the world go! I would just also like Anthropic to like, take that seriously? the Trump admin are evil gangsters, yes, but that's not actually a new development as of last week and maybe should have factored into the last year and a half of loud insistence that this industry was a matter of national security—i.e. the traditionally unaccountable domain of the evil gangsters. if you want to say "there was nothing they could have done, this was inevitable, no amount of statements from the CEO about the super urgent national security implications of their latest model and how important it was that 'America's adversaries' not have access to it, or slight decrease in such statements, could have any effect on the outcome" that's one thing; idk if I agree but it's possible, it's a factual question, and unfortunately we might find out in court. but when Anthropic proclaim "hey guys the fate of all humanity depends on AI going right" you can't then, when it threatens to go wrong, say "wow are you really saying they should have acted defensively instead of honestly? that's victim blaming!" well, you can, but you really shouldn't

















