Obsession (2025) Inde Navarrette as Nikki Freeman
Sade Olutola
tumblr dot com
trying on a metaphor
Sweet Seals For You, Always

izzy's playlists!

Kiana Khansmith
taylor price
macklin celebrini has autism
official daine visual archive

Kaledo Art
noise dept.
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

tannertan36
todays bird
🪼

Origami Around
Today's Document
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
sheepfilms

shark vs the universe
seen from Poland

seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh

seen from Japan
seen from Mexico

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia
@witchqueenvisenya
Obsession (2025) Inde Navarrette as Nikki Freeman

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
André Édouard Marty (French, 1882 – 1974)
Once Upon A Time → gifset per episode ↳ 06x07, Heartless
I mean, the whole idea that Daenerys is a white savior rests on incredibly orientalizing notions about “eastern” cultures.
Where do I begin? Daenerys is not racially other to Essos. She’s Valyrian and she was raised in exile, she speaks Essosi languages and is part of Essosi culture and community. That she’ll be considered foreign in Westeros only speaks to the fact that she has a diasporic experience and cannot fit in neatly anywhere as a result. This speaks more to my own immigrant experience than anything the Westerosi characters go through, frankly. Anyway, using the racial lens of a modern era and haphazardly applying it to ASOIAF just generally doesn’t make sense but even if you do accept that reading, Daenerys is not racially dominant to Essos. Like, as it is just look to the fact that you people accuse her of being an imperialist in Essos but a foreign invader to Westeros. That she’s simultaneously considered both by the same “intellectuals” in this fandom only proves that she does not occupy a neat national identity and floats between national identities because of her status as a refugee and exile. Again, as an immigrant, struggling with bicultural heritage in that manner is very relatable to me.
Then there is the persistent idea in this fandom that Essosi cultures are inherently less developed and civilized, inherently incapable of evolving or changing, and inherently suspended in time, bogged down by tradition. It reminds me far too much of white people in real life who claim that sexual violence or homophobia are only issues in nonwestern cultures and that these are things intrinsic to “culture” rather than global manmade systems borne out of patriarchy. Ghiscari culture is incredibly complex. Essos is far wealthier and more advanced than Westeros. Old Ghis has been an empire for thousands upon thousands of years. The idea that it’s “just their culture” rests on the notion that Easterners are just naturally and genetically inclined to doing horrible and oppressive things and that, moreover, Eastern cultures are incapable of changing and growing, that they will always be “behind” and “regressive”. Horribly disgusting and orientalist ideas, and I hate that this is framed as progressive or anti-colonial rhetoric.
What’s worse is the overlying foundation of the former point, which is how the fandom continues to act like Essos is a monolithic culture of monolithic-looking brown people who must speak the same language and participate in the same traditions. Again, it reminds me far too much of how white people talk about Asia and Africa. Even if you want to unequivocally project our modern racial categories (”white” vs “not white”) onto asoiaf, both the main novels and the twoiaf explicitly showcase that there are “white” regions/cultures/cities and people and “not white” regions/cultures/cities and people. Like, Dany herself is an example of a “white” Essosi. Plenty of other “white” Essosi characters exist in canon, from Melisandre of Asshai to Thoros of Myr to Xaro Xhoan Daxos (who is white in the books!) to Salladhor Saan (also white in the books!) to Daario Naharis. Many of the Unsullied and other slaves of slaver’s bay are from diverse cultures - we know that they could be Dothraki or Qartheen or Lysene or Lhazareen or even Ghiscari. While yes, the slavers are Ghiscari, the slaves and slavers don’t inherently share the same culture just by virtue of being Essosi. Again, that’s an orientalist assumption based on the idea that “East = racially Other and monolithic”. We know that the slavers of Astapor, Yunkai, and Meereen, as well as the Dothraki, all kidnap and enslave people from all over Essos. This has been told to us throughout Dany’s arc in ASOS and ADWD. How in the hell can you argue that Dany is a white savior if like half the slaves she freed are themselves white? “Dany = white therefore everything she does is white saviorism” only works if you accept that all Essosi hail from the same cultural and racial/ethnic background and that all of them believe in the same things and have the same “cultural” traditions, which is not only disproved by the canon text itself but also like I said relies on the orientalist idea that the East is monolithic, static, unchanging, regressive, suspended in time, and capable of being simplified and consumed through such dichotomies.
We get to the Ghiscari themselves. I don’t know why people decided that they’re ethnic in the way the Dothraki are. Old Ghis is reminiscent of the Ancient Roman empire. The harpy as a symbol is clearly drawn from that as well. The Ghiscari are described as amber-hued and of red hair. How did people conclude that they’re brown or black? The only way you people can continue to lord this grotesque and racialized misinterpretation is by overly relying on the show’s miscasting of the slaves and slavers. But GRRM himself has said that the slavery of Old Ghis is meant to be reminiscent of the slavery of the ancient Roman empire. And like Essos, the ancient Roman empire was racially diverse as well, but no one is going to argue that the Romans themselves were brown, right? You guys really just decided that a bunch of white dudes are spicy and ethnic and exotic because you lot are so blatantly orientalist that you think Essos = all brown people who look the same and speak the same languages and have the same “culture”.
On an anti-colonial front, slavery and white saviorism often accompanied colonialism or existed in conjunction with colonialism or propped up colonial exploitation. It’s incredibly demeaning to post-colonial peoples to argue that killing slavers, redistributing their wealth to the lowborn, and freeing slaves is like white saviorism when in fact white savior colonialists mostly did the exact opposite. White saviorism in real life has historically been used to justify slavery, to justify colonialism, and to justify eradicating indigenous cultures. To trivialize that because you’re upset at this fictional character’s existence is disgusting.
This argument also ignores crucial details about Dany herself. Like, she was sold as a sex slave to Drogo. This is canonically and textually acknowledged across the five novels. A white savior profits from white saviorism. Dany does not profit from freeing slaves and killing slavers, as it does not benefit her campaign to reclaim the Iron Throne and in fact she delays her campaign to rule Meereen. A white savior has no personal connection to racism and in fact benefits from racism. Dany does not benefit from slavery. In fact, she was herself sold as a slave to Drogo, which means she has a sincere and authentic reason for hating slavery. Why does everyone ignore her entire AGOT arc? Why does everyone ignore the at least seven different indications over the five books from different characters that Dany was bought and sold as a child bride? Moreover, Grazdan mo Eraz, the Wise Master of Yunkai, warns her that if they won the battle they’d enslave her as a sex slave. So she’d have been re-enslaved as a sex slave. You lot are out here crying about white saviorism as if Dany herself would be protected from being enslaved when in fact we know she was already bought and sold once and that it could easily happen to her again. The slavers do not make empty threats, as we well know by now. A white savior will never have to worry about suffering from racism; that is not true of Dany’s connection to slavery, as she already suffered through the indignity and trauma of being bought and sold and was threatened with re-enslavement as well.
Even on a “cultural” front, I find it intriguing that the same people who defend the Ghiscari using a “cultural” argument hold the Old Valyrian practice of slavery against Dany. So “culture” is a good excuse when defending the slavers that Dany goes against, but “culture” is also a good reason to hate Dany? Like, what? If you know and accept that the Ghiscari empire was older than the Valyrian empire and that in fact the Valyrians adopted slavery when they conquered Old Ghis and then introduced it everywhere else in Essos, why are you acting like slavery is some “cultural tradition” that is “unique” or “specific” to the Ghiscari? And even forgetting the Valyrians, we know for a fact that slavery is still practiced in the Free Cities (former Valyrian colonies with the exception of Braavos), even in Pentos, where it is supposed to be outlawed. We already know that the Dothraki and Qartheen enslave people and buy/sell slaves. We know that even Westerosi like Jorah Mormont are slavers, and Tyrion himself in ADWD compares the plight of Westerosi smallfolk to Essosi slaves and observes that the smallfolk are slaves in all but name. Arya Stark is proof of that, given what she went through under Gregor Clegane, Tywin Lannister, and then Roose Bolton, at Harrenhal. Why is slavery a “nonwhite/nonwestern cultural tradition” to defend but otherwise abhorrent? It’s because you lot are so orientalist that you think brown people are somehow incapable of thinking for themselves and that we’re inherently or naturally inclined to being oppressive and that we can’t abolish oppressive institutions like “progressive, enlightened” westerners can. Wrong. Clearly asoiaf shows how oppression exists in both the west and the east. And though GRRM is orientalist and there is plenty of his orientalism to criticize, he at least has not portrayed the orientalist idea that oppression is somehow a cultural “tradition” that’s “exclusive” to nonwesterners.
In short, this argument only holds true if you either a) accept the racist show which is funny because if you accept the show as canon then you should hate quite a few other characters as well or b) if you accept all of these disgusting orientalist & racist premises about nonwestern cultures. I have lots of critique about how GRRM has written the Dothraki characters, as well as how he’s written the Dornish, and certain other aspects of the white Westerosi characters’ storylines as well, but this is frankly ridiculous. I’m not going to go along with this lack of nuance and critical thinking and blatant hiveminded orientalism.
I’m not arguing with anyone on this, and I’m certainly not going to allow any white people to jump on this post to try and teach me what is or isn’t orientalist and racist. Try it and I’ll just block you.
you do kind of have to actively shape how you feel a little bit. you can't just like, passively wait for the world to impress and inspire you. you have to choose to look for it & you have to choose to find it.
take your feelings out for regular exercise to build their strength and endurance

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
madison brown photographed for petite danseuse, the degas art capsule selkie campaign by tyler william parker
#i watch for the plot
That moment when your fated soulmate is a little evil bastard of a man
The thing is you can't even assume people who have read the books have a better or "more" understanding of the ASOIAF universe because there was this post where people were talking about dany legitimising gendry post the long night (in the show) and some goober went "well who gave her the right to do that" and that just tells you all you should ever know about the people who talk about politics in ASOIAF/GOT

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Ok, folks, Daenerys didn't get her name as an "apology" to Dorne (as well as Viserys getting engaged to Arianne). She doesn't "owe" them nor is she seen as someone who owes them, but as family - sealed as such by tragedy even as they have no recent blood relatives to share.
Rather, by the time Dany is born, Targaryens and Martells (having been allies before, with Aerys as a sore spot and all) they are united further in the greatest grief (the killing of shared related little children) done onto them by a third party (Lannisters/Rebels). This one act that wouldn't be justified in any situation or world and will never not be condemned by the narrative sets them aside from the others and together, sharing an understanding of a tragedy that is theirs to bear in between them alone.
Fandom keeps trying to set them apart from the other, make up antagonism that is supposedly already there or that needs nothing much to be there in the future; they try to associate Martells with the Rebels and against Targaryens as victims of some centralised guilt in spite of it literally being the other way around.
Those children were killed, and it doesn't matter who did it and who is secretly sorry or not. It matters that the Rebels shook Tywin's hand and thanked him, and whatever Targaryen guilt is there in the entire affair, in this they are victims as much as Dorne, the Rebels alienating themselves from them as an united front in the one situation in which they are the unquestionable villains to both.
Your daily reminder that Dorne and Targaryens are not opposing factions, that their relationship is defined by their first union onwards, not by their very old initial antagonism back in the days of old hundreds of years before, that Rhaenys and Aegon were also Targaryens, and that both Houses were victims of the Rebels & co in the murders of Elia and the kids.
They were family. They've been family for a long time. Arianne calls them family in present time. Doran does not believe in a pipe dream fake!Aegon being sold to him by interesting parties trying to take advantage of his grief, but he believes in Daenerys.
House Martell/Dorne are not your convenient anti-Targaryen mouthpieces.
"Storm Field" (detail) © Lindsay Blamey, 2025. Archival pigment print. Australian fine art photographer, born 1976, based in Melbourne.
trailing behind
arya & nymeria 👑🐺✨
once upon a time will always be goated just for the fact that the prophecy didn't start until emma swan was 28 (an actual grown person with a fully developed frontal lobe) instead of when she was 16/17 (a literal child).

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Who else dares rise against us in our house?! Matt Smith as Daemon Targaryen in 3.02 - Queen's Landing
are you even a real daenerys fan if you don't hate on HOTD and/or KOT7K targaryen + non targaryen characters for being loved by audiences for things that they hated daenerys for, or also alternately loving these characters for things they got that were explicitly linked to daenerys? because i gotta confess the level of hate i have got building up every time people gas these knockoffs is staggering