ven

Note: These guides are for unlocking special scenes that depend on certain variables. They don't include the standard click interactions, just the special content.

FOR BB:

FOR LANE:

Personal opinion, for reference only.

---

I. E (Extraversion): His energy is directed outward, and he seeks feedback from the external world

It's not that he lacks action—rather, all of his seemingly passive behaviors are, in essence, signals he sends out to the external world, waiting for immediate feedback.

· Energy flow: His attention is always on the outside—the other person's reactions, the atmosphere of the moment, immediate sensory stimulation. He needs external feedback to confirm his own existence and the effectiveness of his actions.

· Interaction pattern: Flirting, telling terrible jokes, deliberately causing trouble—these are all ways he actively creates external interaction. He's not avoiding social contact; he's using the only method he's good at to demand a response.

· Extreme sensitivity to being ignored: The moment someone ignores him, he falls into intense unease and resorts to more extreme behavior to forcibly obtain feedback. Yell at him, hit him—anything is fine. The one thing he can't tolerate is no reaction at all. This drive of "must get a response from the outside" is the core characteristic of extraverted psychological energy.

· Emotional outlet is external: He cannot process emotions alone. He must externalize his emotions into concrete actions and understand what he just felt by observing the consequences those actions trigger.

---

II. S (Sensing): He lives in the concrete, immediate reality

He relies on observable, tangible, instantly verifiable concrete information, rather than abstract concepts or future possibilities.

· His method of testing is through concrete actions: He doesn't silently analyze the other person's intentions in his mind. Instead, he directly says more outrageous things, does more outrageous things, and then observes the behavioral data—angry, crying, or staying. He needs visible evidence.

· Dependence on immediate feedback: Flirting must yield a blush or a comeback in the moment. Telling a joke must immediately elicit laughter or curses. To him, delayed gratification might as well not exist. This is why being ignored makes him break down—without feedback in the present moment, his sensory system loses its landing point.

· Fixation on "the current self": He doesn't improve his behavior because he is loyal to this version of himself that exists right now. Change means negating the objective existence of the present moment. Even if he briefly reflects after the other person leaves, his final conclusion will always be "I wasn't enough of a bastard last time," and he'll double down with an even worse attitude and even crueler behavior. Reflection is not for growth; it's for fortifying the cage.

· Perception of harm is outcome-oriented: He can see that the other person cried, that the other person left, but he cannot see the cumulative process of emotional depletion. He can only recognize the endpoint of an event, unable to trace the chain of cause and effect behind it.

· What attracts him are concrete traits: He is drawn to observable traits in another person—appearance, physique, shyness, humorous reactions, tone of voice. Abstract intellectual charm is a bonus discovered later; the initial attraction comes from concrete, sensory-level contact.

---

III. T (Thinking): He uses logic to construct a self-protective closed loop

He relies on an internal logical system he has built to make judgments, rather than on emotions or interpersonal harmony.

· Logical closed loop: He has constructed the core theorem that "women cannot be trusted" and uses it to explain everything. The other person leaves—proof that he was right. The other person stays—it's only temporary, and more testing is needed. This logical system is always correct because it channels all possibilities toward the same conclusion.

· Deconstructing language and rules: His terrible jokes, puns, deliberately calling MC "husband," referring to himself as "girlfriend"—these behaviors are, in essence, him using logic to play with linguistic symbols. He strips words of the meanings society has assigned to them, retaining only the sensory stimulation function he needs.

· His tests are logical experiments: He treats himself as the variable and the other person as the test subject, continuously increasing the dosage of his behavior to test the other's tolerance threshold. He thinks he's conducting a scientific experiment, but he doesn't realize the subject is a human being, someone who can be hurt.

· Self-justification takes priority over self-reflection: Any information that might shake his logical system will be reinterpreted by him until it conforms to the original theorem. He may briefly reflect on whether a specific action went too far, but the endpoint of reflection is always "I wasn't wrong; the other person just didn't love me enough," never "I need to change."

---

IV. P (Perceiving): He lives in the process and resists definite outcomes

He prefers an open, flexible, spontaneous lifestyle and has an instinctive aversion to proactive decisions and plans.

· He'd rather die than confess his feelings: Confessing means the state of the relationship is explicitly locked in. Whether it fails or succeeds, that is an irreversible endpoint. He would rather drift forever in the ambiguous zone of flirtation than press the button that seals everything into place. He fears the judgment that comes with it.

· Waiting rather than planning: He doesn't formulate a plan for "how to be loved," doesn't improve himself to increase his chances. He simply stands in place, casually waiting for some lucky moment to descend upon him. And then he regrets. He lives within the process of "waiting," not within the outcome of "arriving."

· Doesn't care about being defined: He is completely indifferent to labels like "girlfriend," not because he doesn't care about the relationship, but because he doesn't care about being defined.

· Impulsive behavioral pattern: His troublemaking, testing, and leaving are all spontaneous decisions made in the moment, not the result of long-term brewing. He can be deeply affectionate one second and tell a terrible joke the next. He obeys the impulse of the moment, not a long-term plan.

---

V. Composite Portrait

He is an ESTP whose cognitive functions have been thrown into imbalance by trauma.

His dominant function Se drives him to use concrete actions to demand immediate feedback from the present world. He needs to see, hear, and touch the evidence that the other person loves him. But trauma has transformed his Se from a healthy "embracing the world" into a pathological "testing the world"—he doesn't go out to experience, but to verify.

His auxiliary function Ti has built him an impregnable self-protective logic. "I am not worthy of being loved" is the foundational axiom. "Test everyone" is the execution program. "See, as expected, no one loves me" is the eternally correct output. He uses this logic to explain everything, and he also uses this logic to block off all possibilities for change.

His tertiary function Fe is in a childish state, yet desperately craving connection. It's not that he lacks emotional needs—he longs to be loved, to be chosen, to be embraced. But his Fe is far too immature and can only demand attention through testing, troublemaking, and playing the bastard—like a child who deliberately breaks things just to see his parents' reaction.

His inferior function Ni has completely broken down. He cannot see the long-term consequences of his actions, cannot see that this game of endless testing can only ultimately lead to the other person's exhaustion and the collapse of the relationship. Even if he occasionally catches a glimpse of a possible future, he immediately uses Ti to snuff it out, then continues living in this safe, never-ending test of the present moment.

It's not that he doesn't believe in love. He just doesn't believe that he will be firmly chosen. So he stands in place, waiting on one hand, testing on the other, using the chaos he creates with his own hands to drive away everyone who tries to get close.

---

VI. Comparison with Other Possible Types

Why not ENTP:

The ENTP's dominant function is Ne (Extraverted Intuition). Their core driving force is exploring possibilities and conceptual novelty. ENTPs also test others, but their testing happens on an intellectual level—they throw out various hypotheses and arguments to see how the other person counters them. They enjoy the clash of minds, not behavioral stimulation. This character shows no desire to explore abstract concepts. His tests are all concrete, sensory, present-moment behaviors—he's watching the other person's reactions, not playing a game of ideas. He lacks interest in the arts (ENTPs typically have an interest in various novel concepts). His humor is based on linguistic deconstruction and sensory impact, not intellectual rebellion. He lives in the concrete present, not in the realm of conceptual possibilities.

Why not ESFP:

ESFPs share dominant Se with ESTPs, but their auxiliary function is Fi (Introverted Feeling). An ESFP's testing behavior would carry a stronger color of personal values—"You don't meet my standards, so I'm leaving," or "I feel disrespected, so I'm acting out." But this person has no Fi-style value judgments. All of his behavior is based on a set of logical deductions (Ti), not inner emotional creeds. When he says "women cannot be trusted," it's a logical theorem, not an emotional declaration. He deconstructs everything with puns, which is also a Ti language game, not Fi emotional expression. Behind his terrible jokes lies logical dismantling, not emotional catharsis.

Why not ISTP:

ISTPs share the same functions as ESTPs but in a different order. ISTPs lead with Ti and are supported by Se. Their core is an internal logical world, and action is a supplementary means of verification. ISTPs also test others, but they tend more toward quiet observation and silent analysis, rather than demanding feedback through loud, troublemaking methods. This character's extreme sensitivity to being ignored, intense craving for attention, and his behavioral pattern of actively sending signals outward all point to the energy output of Se dominance, not the restrained analysis of Ti dominance. He is the one standing in the crowd causing trouble, not the one crouching in the corner observing.

---

so, since I got all the achievements, here's how to get all the achievements and endings on "a date with death" under the cut!

A DATE WITH DEATH - beyond the bet DLC, ALL ENDINGS GUIDE!

your choices won't matter until the call on Day 9, therefore when Grim will ask you about your greatest fear, you'll know you're in for choosing your ending.

do a quicksave when you see this, just to have a quicker process on gaining the new 4 endings.

ALL DETAILS UNDER THE CUT!

💛💚💜💙❤️

I know I've already posted about Jester once, but I actually forgot about the pattern around his mouth. So I am posting him again.

(From drink rout shift2)