Why Not Mr. Wolfe?

Rhodes’ network would later boast that it:

A) shaped the borders of Palestine

B) stoked the rise of Hitler, and

C) founded the League of Nations.

These are each intimately connected, although history doesn’t teach us any connection with Rhodes’ group at all. All three points were aimed at the dual purpose of obliterating Germany’s power and preventing the possibility of another Turkish Empire to threaten British supremacy. Indeed, after WWI, Britain seized control of Palestine from Turkey and had a strong voice in turning it into “Israel” after World War II. The Holocaust and resettlement of Jews in Palestine quickly escalated into the “illegal occupation” that still haunts the region today. America, having no interest in overseas affairs, was led to believe that Germany was pure evil, the Holocaust was at the heart of World War II, and Israel was their greatest ally. Considering that Britain and America became close allies after WWII, this all made sense to Americans, who suddenly cared about foreign matters and wanted America to play a role. The nuking of Japan, the Cold War and the Military Industrial Complex were born.

Zionism was in motion by the end of the 1800′s, and many skeptics believe that Jewish agents conspired to fuel the Holocaust, inflate any facts about it into sensational proportions, and thus ensure that Israel would be created for them. The rise of Zionism in parallel with socialism and Cultural Marxism may not be coincidence. It is a fact that Jewish intellectuals belonging to the “Frankfurt School” were behind Cultural Marxism and Critical Theory. This ideology sought to attack Christianity and Western values at their core. The group fled Germany during the reign of the Nazi Party and came to the United States with new progressive names for everything. The theory that cunning Jews were able to outmaneuver or manipulate a group as powerful as the Rhodes/Milner institution leaves me skeptical. I find it more likely that British and Papal interests facilitated or allied with the Jewish Zionist movement as a hedge against German Protestant, Turkish Muslim, and Russian Orthodox dominance. Russia fell to socialists, and the theory that “Jewish Bolshevism” was responsible remains to this day. Hitler’s Germany was propped up by international interests so that it could be totally annihilated afterward, and the Holocaust would be used to justify the creation of Israel.

The British conspicuously withdrew its forces from Palestine and handed the decision over to the newly-founded United Nations, despite the political and economic interests they had in the region. Why? Out of pure and childlike empathy for the Jewish people? The United Nations devised the two-state solution, granting a majority of the land to Jews despite only being a small percent of the population. Obviously the Palestinians rejected this idea. The headline of the New York Times soon read: “Zionists Proclaim New State of Israel: Truman Recognizes It and Hopes for Peace; Tel Aviv is Bombed, Egypt Orders Invasion”. 

Israel’s Victory

The ensuing war against fledgling Israel -- and by extension, the United Nations and the United States, who created it out of thin air -- guaranteed an endless conflict between the USA, the UN, Israel, and the Islamic world, all without Britain looking bad in the process. When Britain left, the Palestinians hoped to claim independence and finally stop being occupied by anyone. Now they were forced to share their land with Jews, entitled and empowered only by the declaration of some new international conspiracy they didn’t know anything about. The Arabs wanted to destroy the Jews and Israel and reclaim their land.

But the sudden, unquestionable, total legitimacy of both the UN and their newly created Israel meant that Israel would receive support and the ability to defend itself. Despite the tiny Israeli forces, their victory against the military onslaught of the Palestinians was decisive. Israel took 3/4 of what was once Palestine, overstepping its UN prescribed boundaries and displacing half of the Arabs who lived there. Then in 1967, Israel was attacked again, and once again had to defend its existence against a unified Arab alliance. The “Six Day War” was an unbelievable victory for Israel, crushing the enormous forces of Egypt, Syria, and Palestine. As a consequence, Israel decided to occupy and overtake the lands of their enemies.

Despite clearly being the target of attempts to wipe Israel off the map without any negotiation process or interest in peaceful coexistence, Palestine was said to be the victim due simply to the fact that they suffered the consequences of defeat. Israel’s victories and military occupation have been interpreted as an unforgivable and monstrous oppression of Palestinian people, and it is only in the context of the subsequent Israeli dominance -- not the fact that they were first attacked on all sides by genocidal enemies without warning -- that the so-called “cycle of violence” can be explained in sympathetic terms towards the Arab world.

America’s Best Friend

As the USA and Britain competed against Soviet Russia around the world with spies, propaganda, and sabotage, the Middle East became a land of proxy wars. Israel served as a sort of proxy for America, but never really obeyed any of the Western powers despite depending on them for billions of dollars in aid and military supplies. Afghanistan and other countries were controlled by Russians, and thanks to the Red Scare America suddenly felt obligated to get involved in wars everywhere to stop them. Cuba, South America, China, and everywhere else were up for grabs. The Rhodes/Milner network (the UN and its channels) had fully infiltrated the American money creation and political power structures, and used the CIA to destroy the reputation of America around the world. 

By now the USA and Israel stand against the rest of the world, defying all regulation by the UN. If either were to fall, the other would lose its biggest proxy. They are codependent, but both rely on Britain’s willingness to come to their aid in times of crisis. This looks to me like old-fashioned “balance of power” politics. The USA funds Israel as it invents and tests military equipment on Palestinians, which the USA is then free to adopt for itself. Whatever Israel does is condoned by the American establishment, despite being 180 degrees opposite from what America itself is taught to be right. Israel and Zionism is blamed for infiltrating the American media while Britain and Europe clearly condemn Israel’s actions. Nobody can claim that Britain is behind Israel, since it voluntarily left Palestine and hasn’t overtly benefited from its existence.

Both Israel and the USA were dragged into an old European power struggle against Germany and the Arab world with the advent of what I call “The World War” (WWI and WWII combined). Globalist British financial interests wanted to topple the Prussia-Ottomon hegemony and create a new supernational government that could permanently manipulate gullible nations in the Post-World War era. Russia and America were pitted against each other for this purpose as well, dividing the world into neat, organized, easily led “blocs”. At the center, between these two irrational, paranoid, hugely wasteful and distracted sides, has been Britain and Israel.

Pope Francis and the Caliphate

The decline of Britain as it is overrun by African and Muslim invaders seeking to turn it into a Caliphate is a UN-Vatican plot. The USA is scheduled for economic destruction any day now, at which point it can be divvied up by all the participants and beneficiaries of the New World Order. The Trans Pacific Partnership and its sibling bills will ensure that nothing remains for American people. We have transcended nationalist and even ultranationalist notions a long time ago. The New World Order is the single hidden world government that recruits and empowers puppets all over the world, eroding nations and empowering international bodies such as the IMF, the UN, and the Vatican. Pope Francis, being a Jesuit himself, is at the center of this game, calling for a one world religion that will unify Christians, Jews, and Muslims under one house.

The center of this one world religion will be Berlin, Germany.

Germany has infinite significance to the Vatican. It was once the home of Charlemagne, the first German Emperor who conquered Europe in the name of Rome and thus saved the Roman Catholic Church from going extinct. This was the beginning of the Dark Ages, when the Vatican gained total power over European monarchy, to squeeze the life out of Europe for its own profit.

Germany is also the former home of Martin Luther, the inciter of the Protestant Reformation which destroyed that very Catholic grip on Europe. This happened exactly 500 years ago. The Jesuit Order was created to lead the “Counter-Reformation”, designed to undermine and eradicate Protestantism around the world using spies, economic pressure, and government manipulation.

Germany is also the home of Otto von Bismark and the Prussian Empire, who banned the Jesuits and began an international culture war against the Pope, threatening to once again cripple the Vatican’s reach in the Counter-Reformation age. Ever since then, the Vatican has made it paramount that Germany loses its religion, degenerates into perversion, and can never again rise to power without being permanently associated with anti-Jewish, white supremacist, horrific memories. The Protestant roots are never spoken of anymore. Martin Luther? Who is that? No, we only talk about Hitler now. German power = Hitler, not Luther or Bismark! The Catholic Church orchestrating international affairs? No, that conspiracy theory is the sole domain of the Jews! Love or hate the Jews, but never speak of the Pope on his throne!

Mass invasions, flooding democracies to hijack policy, and using terrorism to destroy Protestantism? Don’t be silly, the Catholic Church hasn’t been guilty of that since before World War I! Now we only think about the Muslims! They are the ones taking over the world and openly provoking Christians into endless bloody conflict!

All the while, Pope Francis is the ultimate voice of peace and moderation. He is the exception, and the Catholic Church has transformed itself into the house of harmony. Brutal, fundamentalist conflicts are being stoked constantly, driving humanity to despair while we’re shown images of both dead Arab babies, and images of Muslim groups beheading Christians and drowning them in cages. Polarization is the key word of our times. Christians, Muslims, and Jews are supposed to kill each other endlessly, as the world’s population becomes sick and tired of each religion’s fundamentalist beliefs and claims to exceptionalism. The more polarized and traumatized people are, the more they will crave peace and harmony. Pope Francis and the Catholic (literally “Universal”) Church will steadily abandon its former beliefs and become the true religion of everyone who seeks coexistence. He can become the Head of the Beast.

Meanwhile, George Soros, a bona fide Nazi collaborator, funds Catholic organizations in order to lobby a pro-Francis narrative that wouldn’t otherwise exist. Catholics hate Francis, but they might be bribed to change their mind. The idea that inequality -- in every sense of the word -- is something awful that must be changed is the rhetoric of the globalists. Peace, equality, and harmony are the stated goals of the UN, Pope Francis, and globalist leaders. What they really mean is control, desolation, and obedience.

Whether Rhodes and Milner would approve I can’t say. They certainly hated races other than whites, and I don’t think he would like the way Britain has been sacrificed on the altar of political correctness. It seems they created a network that transformed into something greater and more sinister with the help of the Vatican. 

But both the military and cultural revolutions of this period were part of the same international agenda to polarize the East and West into irreconcilable enemies, divided by culture, ideology, and most of all, fear. In the shock and aftermath of the traumatizing World Wars, Russia and the USA both became laboratories for propaganda techniques in the opposite extremes: “Marxists” infiltrated America’s media and education system to destabilize the cultural foundations of the West by promoting the “progressive liberal” agenda, while their counterparts worked to calcify and petrify the East into regressive conservative society that hated Americans. Funny enough, both of them shared a complete and total rejection of one thing in particular: Protestant Christianity. But who cares about that.

In the East, atheism, realpolitik, and scientific outlook were promoted as the decisive endgame ideology; the ideology to end all ideologies. By rejecting the very notion of good and evil, and accepting only the cynical genius of Game Theory, Hegel, and Machiavelli, they believed they were transcending the irrational hypocrisy of the West. After all, Western culture was now suddenly steeped in degeneracy, pornography, drugs, and decadence while still seemingly clinging to Christianity as their guiding morality. In the West, the constant unbearable paranoia of the Cold War drove people to indulge, let loose, reject tradition, and really prove how “free” they were to the Soviets! The outrageous excesses of capitalism during this time also served the dual purpose of showing off Western supremacy to the West, while reinforcing the need for a Marxist revolution to the East. (No more Protestant morality standing in the way of profits.)

Socialism, Democracy, and Disruption

In truth, the grand joke of Socialism is perfectly akin to the grand joke of Democracy before it. Both used wonderful, impossible ideals in order to provoke, justify, and retroactively explain massive, coordinated, destabilizing campaigns of certain groups against the old orders; namely, of Protestant Christian nobility. The failure of Marxism in the West -- particularly the violent, atheistic vision of Marxism which was supposed to eradicate the Christian upper class -- prompted the need for Cultural Marxism instead. Critical Theory was invented to do the trick. This was before the World War.

Since the World Wars are so crucial to modern history, let’s consider the role of Prussia -- the Protestant German Empire, led at its height by Otto von Bismark in the late 1800′s -- in provoking the World Wars. Everyone blames Germany/Prussia for the World Wars, so let’s find out why they were so awful.

Bismark was a legendary political master, using realpolitik and balance-of-power techniques to manipulate world affairs in Germany’s favor. He fought off socialism constantly, served the monarchy loyally, hated the Pope fiercely, and called himself a Lutheran; as you might expect from a German Protestant. During his reign he recognized a pattern: the Catholic Church was using its influence to gain political hegemony in Europe. For this reason he invented “Kulturkampf”, or “culture struggle”, against them. Here’s what Wikipedia has to say about it:

Let’s say that Bismark knew the truth. As the most powerful political leader in the world, there’s a good chance of that. During his reign, he saw the attempts of Catholic regimes to consolidate influence and ultimately lead European politics back to the Vatican. Because he served his Protestant Empire without fear or compromise, he took action to strip Catholics of power and uproot their institutions. He even banned the Jesuits after they tried to flood Germany with millions of Catholics in order to hijack “representational government”:

Notice the massive influx of Catholics during the 1860′s. Wikipedia notes it as if it was a coincidence, but from Bismark’s point of view this was a perfectly logical strategy by the Pope. Thanks to democracy, all the Vatican had to do was flood a country with Catholics until they gained the popular vote, just like they’d done in America before the Civil War, and other countries before that. Catholics were obedient, servile, easy to provoke, and always united on whatever issues the Pope spoke on -- meaning that democracy was an easy tool for the Pope to wield. For this reason, Bismark distrusted democracy and preferred the Protestant monarchy as an institution free from manipulation. Propaganda campaigns smeared him as “anti-liberal” because of this, because at this point, being “liberal” meant allowing the Catholics to invade and gain the majority vote.

His extreme measures of arresting, exiling, and banning Catholic power was too much for the Pope to accept. Expelling and forbidding the Jesuits from operating was practically a declaration of war against the entire Catholic world, since the Jesuits are the main intelligence network and operations arm of the Vatican. Without them, the Catholic conspiracy falls apart instantly, and the Vatican becomes blind to the inner workings of a nation.

From here, Bismark went even further, looking to spread “culture struggle” to other countries, knowing that the Jesuits would use international backlash to get revenge and try to retake Prussian influence by force. This was an old pattern too. 

The other nations had no leader like Bismark. They were putty in the hands of the Vatican, and easily rejected his warnings and plans. He had alarmed the entire system with his bold action. It was only a matter of time:

What a shock indeed that “culture struggle” was being used to attack Protestantism itself by self-proclaimed “secularists” and “socialists” -- conveniently following the expelling of the Jesuits from Prussia! The rise of “socialism” at the end of the 1800′s was, in fact, the rise of the Jesuits against the kind of bold, decisive, monarchical Protestantism Bismark literally represented. The Pope would have his revenge through his other puppets.

The supposed diplomacy and pragmatism of Pope Leo XIII was due to this new balance of power. Bismark was at a disadvantage, so he compromised. He could hardly enlighten all of Europe at once about some new devious conspiracy to overthrow monarchy and religion in the name of socialism, and when he tried to he was labelled “paranoid” and “hysterical”:

Secret forces had, in fact, been undermining his life’s work. He was right to be paranoid. He did not exaggerate the threat at all. His measures were not only fair, but not far enough. Claims that he was somehow “demonic” because he sought to protect the Prussian Empire from Catholic conspiracy is not only incoherent nonsense, but blatant character assassination from the very people who he spurned so greatly with his heroic efforts. Every enemy of the Jesuits ends up ridiculed in history; or rather, historians are careful to only emphasize the handful of people who hated those enemies of the Jesuits.

Multiple assassination attempts on Kaiser Wilhelm I (the King of Prussia at the time Bismark governed) underscored the new enthusiasm of the Pope. He wanted to see Protestant Germany burned to the ground, and he would use socialism to do it. Bismark tried to outlaw socialism entirely, but with the entire Catholic world either secretly or openly united against him, his grip on international politics was slipping. So instead he turned to the problem of socialism at home:

The death of the former King and the arrival of a new, idiotic, possibly Papal-controlled King to serve under caused Bismark huge tension, to the point where he snapped and spoke the truth: he wanted a pretext for crushing the whole socialist movement. He knew that it was a Jesuit-operated movement to infiltrate democratic institutions, and he didn’t care how bad it looked. The Jesuits always used the most virtuous humanitarian, philanthropic, and educational fronts for their plots, serving as poor missionaries while poisoning public opinion against Protestant rulers.

The new stupid King purposely infuriated Bismark to the point where he resigned, and then watched as his life’s work was indeed swept away by incompetence, compromise, and infiltration. He predicted World War I accurately:

Damned foolish indeed. To this day nobody can make heads or tails out of why World War I really happened, and any research on it quickly bogs down into endless pages of nonsense. That’s because it was a badly coordinated Papal scheme to destroy Prussia and divide Europe using whatever flimsy excuse they could muster. Bismark also predicted when it would happen:

Bismark stepped down in the early 1890′s. He knew what was coming.

League of Nations and World War II as the Killing Blow

The first World War destroyed the romanticism, innocence, and Christian monarchy perspective in Europe and, to some extent, America. Total war, tanks, machine weaponry, chemical weapons, and the unfathomable loss of life shattered the old idealistic sense of politics and power as a gentleman’s game, played between diplomatic cousins on opposite sides of a fence. The undemocratic, conspiratorial “League of Nations” was created supposedly to prevent something like that from ever happening again. The German Empire was dismantled completely, and forced to pay for everything that was destroyed in the war for some reason, despite leading economists such as John Maynard Keynes warning that it was completely unfair and impossible. But this wasn’t enough. The expelling of the Jesuits and the anti-Catholic attempts of Bismark would be remembered, just as they had promised.

The history from here: the League of Nations orchestrates the rise of Hitler in secret, feeding him confidence, funding him with big business on the side, making him TIME Person of the Year multiple times, Henry Ford praising him, and everybody conspicuously allowing him to invade countries and talk about conquest despite everyone just barely having destroyed the old German Empire. Unlike the messy, confusing, “damned foolish” war of World War I, everything is extremely simple and obvious this time. The propaganda -- which itself was a new concept born out of the fledgling field of psychology -- is pitch-perfect on all sides, so that even little kids can understand it immediately. Every side uses bright, iconic logos and colors. Even stupid, naive, Protestant, non-interventionist America gets roped into the conflict thanks to Pearl Harbor. Millions of Protestant Americans are sent to die for no reason in Europe. Women are dragged into the industrial world while they’re gone, planting the seeds for social upheaval. Everything goes to hell. Nukes are invented. Germany is ground into dust. Every intellectual in the world agrees that Germany should never be allowed to have power ever again, and many go as far as to say that the German lands should be literally bombed into grassland and never be allowed to be populated again.

United Nations and Cold War as Enlightened Solution

The United Nations was immediately established on the heels of World War II with a declaration that today reads like Orwellian nightmare codespeak, but at the time was a wonderfully idealistic necessity:

Read the inverse of these statements. They are each a threat in disguise. Without the United Nations (world government transcending any nation), humanity is guaranteed to have World War, no human rights, and no human progress or standards of living. The “conditions” required to fulfill “obligations” created by the U.N. are simply another way of saying they need to circumvent sovereignty. There can never be another Bismark. We will only remember Hitler. That’s what nationalism means -- what sovereignty means! Every child learns about the evils of Hitler so they can learn to love and accept the need for the United Nations to hover over all international matters.

The Cold War, with its ridiculous fearmongering and forced “arms race” (ie. the buildup of the international Military-Industrial Complex) was designed to promote constant “culture struggle” between East and West (balance of power politics, with the UN and Pope as the puppet masters). Russia hated Catholicism and rejected their rule as well; they were Orthodox and had a monarchy as well, until the Jesuits succeeded in their communist revolution. The real “culture struggle”, however, was both sides directly against Protestant Christianity. The East did it in the name of socialism (ie. Cultural Marxism, Critical Theory) and the West did in the name of “social progress” just like the U.N. told them to. This is the same “culture struggle” devised by the Jesuits to be used against Bismark.

Reagan Christianity and Political Correctness 

After the Cold War scare had accomplished everything it could, the Soviet Union was finally allowed to collapse under its stupid, tremendous weight. It had been propped up by international businesses profiting off the arms race for decades. Ronald Reagan was put into office to represent the triumph of the Christian Right over the Left Wing socialism, despotism, and atheism of Russia. A new, corrupt American empire would steadily expand in the name of Christianity and morality from here on. Reagan refused to obey George Bush Sr. completely, however, so an assassination attempt was made against him early on. He survived, so they poisoned him until he couldn’t think straight anymore and had to rely on his aides to do thinking for him. (This is standard procedure, and almost certainly why Hillary Clinton is suddenly almost dying and now relies on her daughter Chelsea and the conspicuously Arab terrorist-connected Huma Abedin for every thought she has.) Reagan was instead allowed to play preacher on TV with his wife and focus on the pointless, embarrassing, counter-productive “War on Drugs”, which was actually a CIA campaign to flood America with as much drugs as humanly possible, thus creating a trillion dollar drug empire in all the countries they planned on using against America eventually. The “war” gave the pretense for the CIA to infiltrate countries, establish drug cartels, oversee traffic, and simultaneously manipulate foreign affairs for maximum corruption and profit for banking interests. Murdering, overthrowing, and otherwise provoking foreign people to despise Reagan, Americans, and Christians alike was the cultural byproduct they wanted. The 1980′s drug and porn culture was a perfect way to contrast, underscore, and expose the “hypocrisy” of Christian American leadership, showing it to be ineffective and hollow. Nobody has taken it seriously ever since. The neo-con movement hijacked the political Right instead, focusing on American exceptionalism, promoting a destructive, greedy, imperialistic ultranationalism that has no moral center.

The Left had Political Correctness instead. It was a new way of talking, and therefore a new way of thinking. It started with the Reagan conservative “family values” nonsense, but was taken over by a systematic shift towards “positivity”, New Age philosophy, diversity, inclusiveness, tolerance, censorship, hypersensitivity, coddled children, anti-masculinity, anti-religion, anti-belief, anti-morality, anti-identity, and ultimately total Cultural Marxism. Making an argument from a moral point of view today is considered silly. All morals are relative and therefore invalid. All views must be homogenized and self-cancelling. Founding pillars of Western Civilization such as logic and rhetoric have been demolished, replaced by emojis and reaction gifs.

Today and tomorrow

Whether or not Trump wins, he represents the only hope of America to escape the globalist, Papal scheme, and therefore he also represents the danger of World War III. The comparisons to Hitler by the mainstream media, and the warnings of an economic collapse if he’s elected, are sloppy, lazy threats by a system that can barely be bothered to hide its corruption anymore. They will pull the plug and destroy everything if they can’t get what they want.

The Pope already slipped up and attacked Trump for wanting to build a wall and protect borders, revealing his political agenda against American sovereignty. Ironically, most Catholics despise Pope Francis because he’s too liberal and progressive, so they much prefer Trump.

The current decline of Europe thanks to the Islamic invasion, which is being allowed to continue purely thanks to the EU and UN covering it up and spreading propaganda, is not about total conquest and destruction -- although there is plenty of that as part of the bargain reached with the Islam leaders -- but the equivalent of flooding Prussia with millions of Catholics to screw over Bismark. The fall of Syria is supposed to fulfill Islamic prophecy, and they’re convinced this is all destiny. They are a controlled army of obedient slaves, more reliable to the Pope than Catholics themselves, who will aggressively try to breed with Europeans, who have been trained to become godless whores; at least to conservative eyes. This blending of people will fulfill the old utopian dream of “Eurasia”, a people with no identity, no race, and no religion, fully under the control of central global powers.

Without Trump, there is only globalism and Cultural Marxism. He is fighting both sides at once. He is politically incorrect, nationalist, and practically a reincarnation of Otto von Bismark. If history has taught me something, that means we can expect the end of the world within 20 years.

As Donald Trump gets closer to becoming President of the USA, we are seeing the panic hitting new highs and the bullshit hitting new lows. 

Here is one of the most recent bullshit false flag events. Supposed “KKK” White Supremacist members walk around with cheap, childishly written signs claiming to support Donald Trump, and the media actually reports on it as if it’s a serious, real thing. As you can see, the hands of both individuals are black skinned. One of them at least tries to hide their hand with the red cape because they know how it destroys their legitimacy. Senator Aaron Ford was shown evidence but refused to budge on being outraged that this VERY REAL event was important and condemns Trump.

Now the Los Angeles Times is reporting that the KKK held a public rally in broad daylight in the park and then stabbed people who protested. The story reads like a 7 year old came up with it. Somehow, in 2016, when every person in the world has a phone with a camera built in, NO PICTURES were taken of these despicable KKK members who dared to show their faces in public! But apparently there’s a largely-cropped photo of the guy who was stabbed, laying on the ground with some blood on him as an apparent emergency person takes care of him. That’s all. The rest of the story relies on old historic photos of the KKK doing stuff. RUN WITH IT, SOCIAL MEDIA, DON’T THINK FIRST!

The Onion -- once a staple of unbiased universal satirical news stories -- has now been bought wholesale by Hillary Clinton’s biggest donor and started churning out pro-Hillary stories and spin-pieces:

Here you see a hilarious comparison of the political candidates “positions” on different interests. Donald Trump is pushed all the way to the bottom of the list, while Hillary is prominently displayed at the top, and her position is the only one that is positive, if slightly pointing out the troubles of our modern system. This is repeated for a dozen different issues.

This is the light stuff. What’s really sickening is the New York Times columnist calling for the assassination of Trump publicly by saying he had “good news” about how his campaign will “end”. Plus a major Republican saying that the GOP needs to “put a bullet” in Trump to stop his campaign. They are panicking, and everybody is scrambling to find the angle that will stop him.

Why are they so terrified? The same globalist psychopaths have been controlling world affairs for the last 40 years (at least) and racing toward the end goal in whatever ways they can manage. Remember: Ronald Reagan’s Vice President was George Bush Sr., and within the first year of his presidency they tried to assassinate him so that Bush could step into the role of President. They botched the attempt, so Bush tried to do as much as possible from his lesser role. Since then, it has been George Bush Sr., Bill Clinton, George Bush Jr., Obama (with Hillary Clinton in the highest position they could acceptably give her,) and now they want Hillary in again -- or Jeb Bush, who was disgraced when he dropped out. They desperately wanted it to be Bush vs Clinton again, but he toppled their plan despite universal media support for Jeb Bush as the frontrunner. These families (and the powers they conspire with) have been working on the opposite sides of the political spectrum toward the same goal for decades, and they’re in the final stages. If Donald Trump manages to get elected, he will gut the entire corrupt system and not leave any room for their corrupt power brokers to control things from on high. That cannot be allowed to happen.

What happens if they can’t stop Trump, or have him killed?

Massive economic disaster. It’s already on the schedule, and already starting to happen in short bursts, but they want to have one of their own people in control when the “Big One” happens. The complete destruction of world currencies is the basis for introducing a single universal currency controlled by the International Monetary Fund, or IMF. Donald Trump would have the power to appoint somebody new as Treasury Secretary, which gives him control over the Federal Reserve and potentially the power to protect the American dollar from collapse at the last minute.

The Pope, who has been anti-capitalist and talked constantly about caring for the poor and mistreated from the beginning of his sudden takeover of the Catholic empire, is positioning himself as the spiritual leader of the world in the wake of this collapse. When people lose everything they panic and tend to turn to religion for guidance, and the Pope wants to be there to say “I told you so”. He believes that suffering and hardship is necessary to make people compassionate, which is another way of saying he wants to undermine world economies and exploit the aftermath with a new Dark Age.

Foreign invasion from the south. This is also in planning, but it’s not ready yet. One of the secret reasons why Trump wants to build the wall is to prevent a potential invasion (or “mass migration”, as they are calling it these days!) from the south, whether it’s by South American Communists, Muslims, or some other group. He’s just using illegal immigrants as the official justification. This is another reason why the Pope (a Communist, globalist Jesuit) hates Trump’s wall idea and says they should “build bridges” and not walls.

False Flag Civil War. Bush’s despotic Homeland Security, the CIA and FEMA aren’t going to sit by and allow a total overhaul under Trump’s patriotic, perfectionist administration. I have done some research recently, and it’s clear that Trump is a thorough perfectionist who would clean house if he was given a high office, because he despises being embarrassed by the incompetence of anyone who works for him. The corrupt, bloated, zealous organizations have sworn oaths to the Bush and Clinton families and don’t give a shit about democracy. They already have camps, plans, and rehearsed strategies for how to take over, and they’re going to use whatever they have to in order to drag America into a civil war with false flag terrorist events, “uprisings” falsely carried out by bogus “KKK” and “Nazi” groups (as you’ve seen above) and ruin Trump’s America from the inside, destabilizing everything so that it seems like “evil white men” are rising up like Hitler.

Speaking of which, I’ve talked to multiple people who say that the idea of a wall along America’s border is “like Hitler”. I didn’t know people were quite this retarded, because the Berlin Wall was created by Soviet’s to screw over Americans in one city during the Cold War, and had nothing to do with Nazi Germany. But hey, people remember a wall that was bad that was associated with Germany at some point, so why not draw the comparison?

We find out that Kylo Ren is Han Solo’s son, and that’s great.  Star Wars can definitely do that.  Good for them.  It’s nice to see that something resulted from Solo and Leia’s love for each other, and it may as well be a huge component of the plot.  But it brings up the huge question: what will Han Solo do about his destructive, evil son?  I waited patiently, knowing that this would be extremely tricky to pull off.

Throughout the movie we never see Han Solo react to Kylo Ren in a meaningful way.  There’s nothing to grab onto, emotionally.  Ren was sent away as a child for training, and now Solo is just like whatever, he’s evil.  Every scene between him and Leia is drab, not only because the actors are old as hell and have almost no energy left to give the camera, but because of the writing.  When the people are reunited and the rebels have to go stop the new Death Star, Leia wants Han to somehow bring Ren back to the side of the good guys.  Han says he’s completely gone to the dark side, but that’s about it.  He doesn’t really care. They have this stupid non-conversation about “We had some good times, right?”  “Yeah, we had good times.”

He goes to the planet to rescue the girl -- not to confront Kylo Ren.  The confrontation is accidental.  This is when things turn to crap.

Han Solo calls out to his son, and walks out to meet him on one of those conspicuously tiny walkways that has no railings.  Kylo Ren takes off his helmet and they have a nothing conversation about nothing.  “Come back to the good guys, son.  You can be a good guy.”

“I want something.  But something something.”

“Alright, whatever, let’s stare at each other.”

Then they have a little tug of war over a lightsaber, and Ren stabs Han, killing him and throwing him over the edge of the bridge. I felt nothing when this happened, and neither did anybody else, despite the characters screaming in complete shock when the good guy left himself open and the bad guy did something bad.  Big surprise?  The climax of the drama ends with that flaccid garbage, and it just feels like Harrison Ford wanted to end his part in the series.

So...

HERE’S HOW IT SHOULD HAVE GONE INSTEAD:

From the start, we see that Han Solo is not only sad about Kylo Ren, he’s torn up inside and trying to hide it.  He’s been trying to learn information about him secretly for years, and part of him has always wanted to go after him, but he’s too realistic.  Maybe he even starts to practice a speech that he wants to give to Kylo Ren, but shakes the idea out of his head and calls himself an idiot.

He doesn’t just get dragged into the conflict and then accept his mission to fly to the Death Star to save the galaxy, he sees it as some kind of cosmic punishment for being reckless his whole life, and ultimately pushes to go there when he realizes they’re destroying entire fucking solar systems.  He’s too old and jaded to enjoy the smuggling life anymore, and sees life in the bigger picture.  He needs to protect the galaxy from his son, and his son from the dark side... although he’s still not into the whole pious or righteous angle.

Leia tells him how much she’s prayed for Kylo Ren to see the light.  In response, Han struggles to explain the priorities to Leia, and gets flustered at the central misunderstanding between them, which is that Leia believes Han is a hero at heart, and has the power to convert darkness to light:

“I was never a good guy, Leia... I did the math and rolled the dice.  That’s all it was.  It turns out, we got lucky.  I got what I wanted.  I got you.  And him... Ben was... He could’ve been the thing that [changed me]...  But now... it just needs to end... and it needs to end today.  If we do make it inside, and if I do meet him... there’s not... I know you don’t want to hear it, but I’ve done the math a million different ways on this one... [Flustered].  All I’m trying to say is... Say a different prayer today.”

When it's finally time to confront Kylo Ren, we see that Han is still unsure at first, but then something comes over him.  His deep, repressed instincts kick in.  In that moment, he becomes the father of Kylo Ren.  He comes out from hiding, yells at Kylo Ren in outrage, with authority, listing off a series of atrocities he was responsible for -- in such detail that it’s clear that he’s been keeping close track for as long as Ren’s been in power.  Han’s guilt is killing him, because he sees an innocent child who’s been dragged into a nightmare of pain and confusion, not a monster.  But he’s too smart to think there’s a way of turning things around.  He pours his heart out, condemning his son.

Kylo Ren also isn’t prepared for this, but his own instincts kick in.  He makes it obvious that he needed a father figure, and the dark side offered it to him.  He mocks Han Solo as a hypocrite, saying that no matter how many minds he’s searched, he’s never seen one as slimy and faithless as his.  He begins to drag up memories of Han, including times he’s been unfaithful to Leia, betrayed innocent people, and given in to his hate

Provoked even further, Han calls him out as a coward who has to use the dark side to obtain a name for himself because he can’t live up to the legend of his real dad.  He brags about his own accomplishments, which he got without bending to anyone else’s plans or becoming a servant of anyone.  He brags about marrying a princess and making a mockery of the Empire, and further belittles his son’s “lonely life of suffering” as a disgrace to the Solo name.

Kylo gets so flustered and emotional that he seems like he’s about to kill Han, but then a sinister smile creeps over his face, which he hides. He senses the self-hatred, regret and guilt that Han carries, and begins to feed it, by justifying all of the atrocities Han listed.  He makes fun of the millions of weak people who died at his hands, because they, too, wanted to imitate men like Han Solo and the rebels.  By realizing that the best way to hurt Han is to become a monster himself, he starts to enjoy the sins he’s been struggling with.  He calls them as the rightful price a galaxy must pay for Han’s own irresponsibility.

Han can’t win the argument, and he knows it.  But Kylo Ren is distracted, and that’s an opportunity. He still has one last bomb in his pouch, and he arms it behind his back.  When he mockingly laughs at the speech of Kylo Ren, it pushes him to the point of violence.  Kylo force lifts Han up into the air, choking him.  Chewie and the other heroes notices this, and see that he has the bomb right next to Kylo Ren....

Chewie doesn’t want to hit the detonator, and hesitates.  Han is losing consciousness as Kylo screams about the pathetic legacy of a smuggler compared to the First Order, etc. etc.  He can’t hold on to the bomb much longer.  As Han begins to lose consciousness and looks like he’s going to die, Kylo Ren’s expression begins to soften, and he realizes that what he’s doing is wrong.  He feels guilt, and just as he’s about to weaken his grasp on Han’s neck, the bomb drops, hitting the walkway.  Kylo sees it, and realizes it was a trap.  A devastated look of betrayal and hurt crosses his face, and this turns into uncontrolled rage.  He screams and throws Han over the platform into certain death, which finally convinces Chewie to hit the trigger.

Knowing that the bomb will go off, Kylo leaps away and shields himself with his cloak, but still gets hit hard by the blast.

From here you can have him escape with wounds, much more personal than a laser blast by Chewie, and all that good stuff.