will byers stan first human second
Sade Olutola

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
Stranger Things
macklin celebrini has autism
Fai_Ryy
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Noah Kahan

Discoholic 🪩

PR's Tumblrdome
YOU ARE THE REASON
Xuebing Du
hello vonnie
One Nice Bug Per Day

Love Begins
The Stonewall Inn
EXPECTATIONS
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

seen from Venezuela
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from France

seen from South Korea
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Luxembourg
@voodoooo-blog

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
tattooplace:

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
tatto
Astronomical Distances and Magnitudes
Measuring Astronomical distances In the words of Douglas Adams, the author of The Hitch-Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy: Space is big. You just won’t believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it’s a long way down the road to the chemist’s, but that’s just peanuts to space. The distances involved in the universe are so vast that metres or kilometers will just not suffice. We must introduce new length scales with which can span the heavens. THE ASTRONOMICAL UNIT A.U. One natural and practical unit we can devise is the distance from the Sun to the Earth. This is the A.U. or Astronomical Unit. 1 Astronomical Unit = 149 598 000 km LIGHT YEAR Moving to larger distances even the AU becomes unweildly and so the next suitable unit is the light-year. The light-year, as its name would suggest, is the distance travelled by light in one year. All electromagnetic waves travel at a speed of x 299,792,458 ms-1 in a vacuum and with an average year being 365.25 days, one light year is 299,792,458 x 108ms-1 x (365.25 x 24 x 60 x 60) s = 9.46073 x 1015 m. or 9.46073 x 1012 km. 1 lt-yr = 63 239.6717 AU With our new measuring sticks to hand we can give a few examples of the scale of the universe. The distance from the Earth to the nearest star (Alpha Centauri A or B) after our Sun is 4.3 ly. The Milky Way Galaxy is about 150,000 light-years across The andromeda galaxy is 2.3 million light-years away. The edge of the observable universe is 46.5 Giga light years away. THE PARSEC The other commonly used unit in astronomy and in Star Trek is called the Parsec (parallax of one arc second). The parsec is defined to be the distance at which a star would have a parallax angle p equal to one second of arc (1/3600 deg). The two dimensions that specify this triangle are the parallax angle (defined as 1 arcsecond) and the opposite side (defined as 1 Astronomical Unit (AU), the distance from the Earth to the Sun). The parsec defined as the distance required to create a parallax angle of one second of arc. Parallax is the apparent shift in the nearest stars due to the motion of the Earth around the Sun. The method of parallax gives rise to a natural distance unit that astronomers call the parsec (which we shall abbreviate as pc). The parsec in trigonometric terms. 1 Parsec = 3.08568025 × 1016 m. also used are kpc =1000 pc and Mpc =1 million pc 1 Parsec = 3.26 lt yrs. If the star is not further than 500 light-years, then the parallax shift of the star can be used to find the distance from the Earth. Distance (in parsecs) = 1/parallex angle. Magnitude of Stars Apparent Magnitude Early Greek astronomers used a scale of magnitude devised by Hipparchus around the 2nd century BC, which was based on how bright stars appeared with the naked eye. The Hipparchus scale went from magnitude 1, for the brightest stars, up to magnitude 6, for those stars which were barely visible. Improvements in the light gathering power of telescopes made it possible to compare the intensities of the light from stars more accurately. In 1856, Norman Robert Pogson formalized the system by defining a typical first magnitude star as a star that is 100 times as bright as a typical sixth magnitude star. Thus, a first magnitude star is about 2.512 times as bright as a second magnitude star. The fifth root of 100 (since magnitude 6 stars must be 1: x5 is known as Pogson’s Ratio. In calculations, however, the factor 2.5 is often used. To make things more confusing, the brightest stars in the sky exceed magnitude 1. These bright starts are accommodated by allowing negative magnitudes. The Sun has an apparent magnitude of -26.74, while Sirius has a magnitude of -1.46. At the other end of the scale, as the light gathering power of telescopes has increased, the magnitude scale has extended to encompass much fainter stars. The dimmest object currently observable with the largest telescopes have a magnitude of 30. As a useful reference point, the star, Vega is taken to be of 0 magnitude. More accurate measurements put its apparent magnitude at 0.03. It is also important to note that the magnitude system is only meaningful when magnitudes are compared when measured through the same wavelength band. Name Apparent Magnitude Distance from Earth Sun -26.74 1 AU Full Moon - 12 200,000 km Venus -4.71 38 million km Sirius -1.46 2.6pc Vega 0.03 13pc Canopus 0.7 96pc ±5pc Faintest Stars 30 as seen with the European Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT) or Hubble Space Telescope - The apparent magnitude m is given by m = - 2.5 log10(b) + C(1) Where, b is the observed intensity or brightness of the star and C is a constant, depending on the band the object is observed in, i.e. ultra-violet U, blue, B or visible V. If we measure the brightness of two different stars, using a detector in the same band, we can determine their difference in magnitude. The difference in their apparent magnitude is given by m1 - m2 = - 2.5 log10(b1/b2) where m1 and m2 two are apparent magnitudes of the two stars, and b1 and b2 are their respective brightness. From the properties of logarithms, the ratio of the intensities / brightness of the two stars is. m1 - m2 = - 2.5 [log10(b1) - log10(b2)] m1 - m2 = - 2.5 log10(b1/b2)(3) Absolute Magnitude The apparent brightness of a star is how bright it seems when viewed from the Earth, but a large, bright star can appear dim if it is a long way from the Earth and a dim star can appear to be bright if it is close to the Earth. Therefore, the apparent magnitude has no bearing on the distance from the Earth. To give an acurate measurement of the brightness of a star we need to make an absolute magnitude scale. The absolute magnitude is how bright a star is when viewed from a set distance. Stars being rather large objects, a distance of 10 parsecs was chosen. The absolute magnitude is the brightness of a star at a distance of 10 parsecs. Absolute Magnitude and Inverse Square Law of Intensity In order to find the absolute magnitude, we need to know the distance of the star from the Sun. How do we do this? The intensity or brightness of light decreases with distance from the star. The rate at which it decreases is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. Thus, if we have a star of luminosity L and we move a distance d the same quantity of light has to cover a larger spherical area. Therefore, the brightness or intensity is given by b = L/(4πd2) (4) Or in more simple terms, the apparent brightness of the star is proportional to the 1/distance2 To calculate the absolute magnitude we are essentially using the relative magnitude formula and the inverse square law to allow us to substitute distance for brightness. Now we can compare its magnitude with a star at set distance of 10pc. M- m = -2.5 log10(d2) - (-2.5 log10102) Using the rules of logarithms to make some simplifications. M = m -2.5 log10(d2/102) M = m - 5 log(d/10)(5) M = m - 5 [log(d) - 1] M = m - 5 log(d) + 5(6) Distance Modulus Starting from equation (6) we can calculate the distance d from the Earth if we know the absolute magnitude. In practice we don’t know the absolute magnitude because we cannot travel 10 parsecs from the star in question. We can use several indirect methods to determine its absolute magnitude. If the star is on the main sequence of stars then we can determine the brightness from its parallax. If we know the apparent magnitude m and the absolute magnitude then we can find the distance in parsecs to the star. m - M = 5 log10(d) + 5 Rearranging for d d = 10((m-M)+5)/5
Splashdown! SpaceX Dragon Returns to Earth
NASA Wants You to Train Its Space Robot
Astronauts on board the International Space Station don’t have a lot of free time, which means the last thing they want to do is expend energy on mundane chores like vacuuming. Enter Robonaut 2, the first humanoid robot in space that takes on these everyday tasks.
R2, which has been on the ISS since 2011, has a mission: clean handrails, vacuum air filters and take air-flow measurements. The problem is it doesn’t yet have the ability to learn and complete the work. So NASA is looking for someone to teach the bot. The Robonaut Challenge calls on contestants to write algorithms that allow R2 to interact with a training dashboard the space agency built.
“R2 is meant to contribute back to the ISS by freeing the astronauts up to do more scientific research and the more difficult tasks,” Allison Thackston of the Robonaut team tells Mashable via email. “We measure our cost savings in crew hours saved, which translates into more important scientific and engineering research being done.”
Competitors will start by writing code that enables R2 to “see” and recognize the state and location of LED-illuminated buttons and switches on the dashboard. Building on that successful algorithm, contestants will write control software that manipulates the objects that Robonaut can recognize and locate.
The contest started on Monday morning and will run for three weeks. However, the Robonaut team says it won’t take long for solutions to start trickling in.
“While there is no requirement for contestants to submit their solutions early, we usually begin seeing the first solutions within a week of launch,” says Robonaut’s Julia Badger.
NASA may eventually use the Robonaut 2 to prepare or clean up work sites for astronauts outside the ISS. However, as sophisticated as the technology is, R2 won’t likely replace humans in space.
“Robotics technology has a long way to go,” says Badger. “But having a robotic assistant is a great way to push that technology while still having the benefit of human interaction and supervisory control.”
NASA is hosting its Robonaut Challenge with TopCoder, the world’s largest open platform for the computer science community.
President Obama’s brain map project is hardly the next Human Genome
The BRAIN research initiative is a big dream with a hefty price tag. That money would be better spent on other science research
It’s enough to make neuroscientists scream – for joy, or exasperation. Amidst criticism of the European Commission’s decision to award €1bn to the Human Brain Project came news that the US was planning its own version. In February, the New York Times announced that a project called the Brain Activity Map (BAM) was in the works. Today, President Obama confirmed that the project will go ahead under the new name Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN). But details are scarce, including how much the project will cost, its goals, and plans for meeting them.
This isn’t a moment to celebrate. It’s a missed opportunity.
Investing in neuroscience is a great idea, but this is not a general boost in funding for neuroscience research. This is concentrating funds on one project, putting many eggs in one basket. Early estimates indicate BRAIN could receive as much $3bn over 10 years. Today’s announcement revealed there will be an initial investment of $100m in 2014, after which additional budgeting will be decided.
All that money for a project that has yet to come up with “a plan, a time frame, specific goals”. Yet, there are laboratories all over the country who have very well-defined projects and are in need of $1 to $2m. Imagine if President Obama instead announced $1m for 100 neuroscience projects every year for the next 10 years. The country could become a neuroscience hub, able to recruit talented researchers from all over, boost the economy, and reestablish America’s sliding position as a world leader in science and technology. Sadly, US leaders think they need a ‘Big Science’ project to compete.
What does the project aim to do? In June of 2012, scientists published an article in Neuron first proposing BAM/BRAIN:
Understanding how the brain works is arguably one of the greatest scientific challenges of our time….A fundamental underlying limitation is our ignorance of the brain’s microcircuitry.
No argument there. We are still in the infant stages of understanding how neurons throughout the brain are connected, how these connections give rise to behaviors, or how connections change. Understanding brain microcircuitry is a must for neuroscience. But how do we do that? We propose to record every action potential from every neuron
Here’s where the problems start. In simple model systems, like the fruitfly, the brain contains more than 100,000 neurons. Recent estimates put the number of neurons in the human brain at around 86bn, located at various depths. Even if we could access all neurons, which we can’t with current technology, how will we record the activity of every one? The authors propose imaging the activity of neurons using voltage sensors – indicators that light up when the electrical potential of a cell changes. But a recent review points out:
“Voltage imaging methods suffer from poor signal to noise and secondary side effects, and they fall short of providing single-cell resolution.”
Should we be developing this technology? Absolutely. Should we bank on the idea that even substantial advances could permit “imaging every spike from every neuron”? Absolutely not. The authors also discuss the use of electrical recording probes: “There are technical hurdles to be surmounted, but when the technology is perfected, recording from many thousands of neurons is conceivable.”
Many thousands of neurons is a far cry from 86bn. And even if their activity is recorded, how will it be separated and analyzed? Researchers working with only hundreds of recording sites face significant challenges in separating signals to determine which spikes come from which neurons.
Finally, the authors propose a technique that has received the largest attention:
“DNA molecules could be synthesized to record patterns…of spikes in each cell, encoded as calcium-induced errors, serving as a ‘ticker-tape’ record of the activity of the neuron.”
Sounds like a dream. And that’s exactly what it currently is. Last year, researchers published a paper in PLoS ONE showing how cation concentrations could be monitored using DNA polymerases. But that work was done in cultured bacteria, and has yet to be tested in cultured neurons, let alone in vivo. Yes, we should invest in this technology, but it should not be a cornerstone of a multi-million dollar project…yet.
In recent months, researchers published articles in Science and ACS Nano emphasizing that a goal of the project will be to develop new technologies for studying the brain. President Obama is also concentrated on technology-building, as indicated by the project’s new name and continued reference to potential economic returns as seen with the Human Genome Project. But BRAIN is not the Humane Genome Project.
HGP had defined goals; researchers knew where they were going and what an end result should look like. BRAIN researchers have yet to figure this out. What will a complete map of the brain look like? How will we know when it is complete? How will the dynamic nature of the brain be accounted for? Will recording the activity of all neurons in the brain produce understanding of behaviors or diseases? Neuroscientist Donald Stein has said, “the technology ought to follow the concepts rather than the other way around.”

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
8 Baffling Astronomy Mysteries
We’ve seen a lot of information explaining the wonders of astronomy and space, but what of the mysteries? The realm scientists have yet to fully understand. SPACE has this awesome article getting into a few, 8 in total, of those very areas in the study of the stars that continue to baffle scientists:
The universe has been around for roughly 13.7 billion years, but it still holds many mysteries that continue to perplex astronomers to this day. Ranging from dark energy to cosmic rays to the uniqueness of our own solar system, there is no shortage of cosmic oddities.
The journal Science summarized some of the most bewildering questions being asked by leading astronomers today. In no particular order, here are eight of the most enduring mysteries in astronomy:
8 What is Dark Energy?
Dark energy is thought to be the enigmatic force that is pulling the cosmos apart at ever-increasing speeds, and is used by astronomers to explain the universe’s accelerated expansion.
This elusive force has yet to be directly detected, but dark energy is thought to make up roughly 73 percent of the universe.
7 How Hot is Dark Matter?
Dark matter is an invisible mass that is thought to make up about 23 percent of the universe. Dark matter has mass but cannot be seen, so scientists infer its presence based on the gravitational pull it exerts on regular matter.
Researchers remain curious about the properties of dark matter, such as whether it is icy cold as many theories predict, or if it is warmer.
6 Where are the Missing Baryons?
Dark energy and dark matter combine to occupy approximately 95 percent of the universe, with regular matter making up the remaining 5 percent. But, researchers have been puzzled to find that more than half of this regular matter is missing.
This missing matter is called baryonic matter, and it is composed of particles such as protons and electrons that make up majority of the mass of the universe’s visible matter.
Some astrophysicists suspect that missing baryonic matter may be found between galaxies, in material known as warm-hot intergalactic medium, but the universe’s missing baryons remain a hotly debated topic.
5 How do Stars Explode?
When massive stars run out of fuel, they end their lives in gigantic explosions called supernovas. These spectacular blasts are so bright they can briefly outshine entire galaxies.
Extensive research and modern technologies have illuminated many details about supernovas, but how these massive explosions occur is still a mystery.
Scientists are keen to understand the mechanics of these stellar blasts, including what happens inside a star before it ignites as a supernova.
4 What Re-ionized the Universe?
The broadly accepted Big Bang model for the origin of the universe states that the cosmos began as a hot, dense point approximately 13.7 billion years ago.
The early universe is thought to have been a dynamic place, and about 13 billion years ago, it underwent a so-called age of re-ionization. During this period, the universe’s fog of hydrogen gas was clearing and becoming translucent to ultraviolet light for the first time.
Scientists have long been puzzled over what caused this re-ionization to occur.
3 What’s the Source of the Most Energetic Cosmic Rays?
Cosmic rays are highly energetic particles that flow into our solar system from deep in outer space, but the actual origin of these charged subatomic particles has perplexed astronomers for about a century.
The most energetic cosmic rays are extraordinarily strong, with energies up to 100 million times greater than particles that have been produced in manmade colliders. Over the years, astronomers have attempted to explain where cosmic rays originate before flowing into the solar system, but their source has proven to be an enduring astronomical mystery.
2 Why is the Solar System so Bizarre?
As alien planets around other stars are discovered, astronomers have tried to tackle and understand how our own solar system came to be.
The differences in the planets within our solar system have no easy explanation, and scientists are studying how planets are formed in hopes of better grasping the unique characteristics of our solar system.
This research could, in fact, get a boost from the hung for alien worlds, some astronomers have said, particularly if patterns arise in their observations of extrasolar planetary systems.
1 Why is the Sun’s Corona so Hot?
The sun’s corona is its ultra-hot outer atmosphere, where temperatures can reach up to a staggering 10.8 million degrees Fahrenheit (6 million degrees Celsius).
Solar physicists have been puzzled by how the sun reheats its corona, but research points to a link between energy beneath the visible surface, and processes in the sun’s magnetic field. But, the detailed mechanics behind coronal heating are still unknown.
Mindfulness Made Simple
by Christopher Bergland in The Athlete’s Way
Mindfulness” has become a buzzword that is often misinterpreted. What is mindfulness? How can it benefit you?
Mindfulness is much more basic than most people realize. In fact, I’ve isolated 3 easy steps to kickstart a state of mindfulness in a few seconds. To kickstart a state of mindfulness all you have to do is: Stop. Breathe. Think about your thinking. Anybody can use this simple mindfulness technique throughout the day to stay calm, focused, optimistic, and kind.
This close-up picture of a daffodil illustrates simple mindfulness training. What part of the image is your attention drawn to first? Is your focus initially drawn to the stamen at the center? Where do your eyes and your attention go from there? Notice how you can hone in on the center or decide to inspect the abstract shapes and different colors in the surrounding. We all have the power to guide our thoughts consciously—to zoom in and zoom out on specific things in our environment and inside our minds. Obviously, you can decide how long you want to look at the daffodil, what parts of the image you want to focus on, and decide when to turn your attention towards something else. This is mindfulness in action.
A recent New York Times Magazine article by Susan Dominus titled ‘Is Giving the Secret To Getting Ahead” offers insights into the power of mindfulness to help people succeed professionally. Although the article doesn’t use the term ‘mindfulness’ specifically, the concepts of mindfulness are represented in the advice given throughout the article.
The Times article profiles Adam Grant, who is a professor in the Management Department at Wharton, and features the ideas from his upcoming book “Give and Take.” Grant is an expert in organizational psychology, which is designed to help people enjoy the work they do, and to keep them doing it. Grant is quoted as saying, “The greatest untapped source of motivation is a sense of service to others; focusing on the contribution of our work to other peoples’ lives has the potential to make us more productive than thinking about ourselves.” It is interesting that whether the motivation to practice mindfulness comes from a place of capitalistic shrewdness or Buddhist loving-kindness, the benefits for the individual and the collective are still there.
What is Mindfulness?
Mindfulness is simply about being mindful of what you’re thinking and deciding where you choose to focus your attention. Ideally, one would choose to focus his or her attention towards compassion, loving-kindness, and optimism. Mindfulness is about deciding to look on the bright side and deciding to be kind to yourself and others. That’s it.
Mindfulness has its roots in Buddhism and the Noble Eightfold Path that Buddha taught over 2,500 years ago as the path to Nirvana or enlightenment. Although William James didn’t use the term “Mindfulness”, he explored the topic extensively in his life’s work and in The Principles of Psychology (1890). Mindfulness is not a new age fad. It has been around forever, but in a modern world it’s more important than ever we each begin practicing it.
Some purists and Buddhist teachers aren’t thrilled to see mindfulness being diluted and applied to pop psychology and business. However, most seem to realize that the more people in the world who are practicing some type of mindfulness the better. Unfortunately, several definitions of mindfulness are currently being used in modern psychology and mindfulness training. It’s like the Wild West when it comes to a standardized Western definition of mindfulness…almost anything goes.
I base my definition of mindfulness on the landmark study by Bishop, Lau et al. (2004) from the University of Toronto titled: Mindfulness: A Proposed Operational Definition published by the American Psychological Association. In their consensus on an operational definition of mindfulness Bishop and Lau propose a two-component model of mindfulness:
1.The first component involves the self-regulation of attention so that it is maintained on immediate experience, thereby allowing for increased recognition of mental events in the present moment.
2. The second component involves adopting a particular orientation toward one’s experiences in the present moment, an orientation that is characterized by curiosity, openness, and acceptance.
The Benefits of Mindfulness
There has been a surge of scientific research on mindfulness since Dr. Jon Kabat-Zinn began teaching the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) in 1979. In the past decades research has shown that the benefits of mindfulness include: stress reduction, improved concentration, boosts to working memory, reduced rumination, less emotional reactivity, more cognitive flexibility, higher level of relationship satisfaction, etc. The list goes on and on.
Studies on the benefits of mindfulness are currently trending heavily in psychology and medical journals. In the past month alone at least four studies were released on the benefits of mindfulness and mindfulness training. Two of particular interest are: “Mindfulness Training Improves Working Memory Capacity and GRE Performance While Reducing Mind Wandering” by Michael Mrazek and colleagues at UC Santa Barbara and another from Belgium which found that Mindfulness at School Reduces Likelihood of Depression-Related Symptoms in Adolescents.
Mindfulness Training 101
Many people avoid any type of ‘mindfulness training’ because they think that it’s complex, new-agey or fear that they ‘aren’t doing it right.’ Albert Einstein believed, “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” I realize that my “3 steps to kickstart mindfulness” are verybasic. I simplify for a reason: I want to demystify mindfulness so more people will get in the habit of practicing mindfulness regularly throughout the day and benefit from it.
You don’t have to set aside time to sit quietly in the lotus position and burn incense to practice mindfulness. You can do it anytime, anywhere. From staying calm when you’re stuck in a traffic jam; to having a heart-to-heart conversation with a friend; to making scrambled eggs; to taking an exam; or when you’re making love with your partner… Being fully present in the moment creates mindfulness no matter what you are doing.
Mindfulness is about being aware of your surroundings, connecting, and then guiding your thoughts in a positive and constructive direction. With practice you’ll get better at guiding your thoughts to fine tune a state-of-mind that best fits whatever circumstance you find yourself in.
Mindfulness and Athletics
As an athlete, I never labeled my mindset of being totally focused and ‘in the zone’ as being a state of ‘mindfulness.’ But it is. Again, this is mostly semantics. Anyone who exercises regularly or competes in sports learns through practice that being distracted (or focusing your attention on the negatives) will cause you to fail.
In order to master a sport (or complete a workout) athletes learn through practice how to guide their thoughts towards a positive and optimistic mindset. Everyone who works out regularly is doing a form of mindfulness training within the athletic process. You can bring this skillset back to the work-a-day world and create mindfulness in your daily life. This is the core principle of The Athlete’s Way.
Conclusion: Every Breath You Take
We all get stuck in mental ruts and have patterns of habitual thinking and behavior that can be counterproductive. Mindfulness is a chance to snap out of it, push the reset button and have a fresh start. The next time you find yourself dwelling on something that makes you feel resentful, negative or hopeless. Stop. Breathe. Think about your thinking. And then guide your attention and thoughts towards something positive.
William James wrote: “Why should we think upon things that are lovely? Because thinking determines life. It is a common habit to blame life upon the environment. Environment modifies life but does not govern life. The soul is stronger than its surroundings”
You have the power to focus your attention on positive thoughts that make you feel optimistic and hopeful; or you can think about negative things that make you feel cynical and depressed. You can choose to be mean and hateful, or kind and loving. The choice is yours. Mindfulness puts you in the driver’s seat of your thoughts and actions.
On average, human beings take 20,000 breaths a day. That gives each of us 20,000 chances everyday to kickstart some mindfulness. If you don’t already, try practicing some simple mindfulness today.
Laser Light Cures Cocaine Addiction By stimulating one part of the brain with laser light, researchers at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center at UC San Francisco (UCSF) have shown that they can wipe away addictive behavior in rats – or conversely turn non-addicted rats into compulsive cocaine seekers. Read more: http://www.laboratoryequipment.com/news/2013/04/laser-light-cures-cocaine-addiction
The first permanent mountaintop observatory was the Lick Observatory. Built in 1888 by the Warner and Swasey Co., the telescope still sits in it’s original spot just east of San Jose and is still operating to this day.
We recently visited the observatory and talked with Steve Vogt, an astronomy professor at UC Santa Cruz, who used to sneak into the observatory as a kid. Watch the video →

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming