The first and shiniest star

She doesn't deserve it and had all the good intentions in the world, but there's undeniable truth to these accusations. She disobeyed, rushed into battle on an untrained dragon that doesn't even fully obey her practically immediately after riding it, and made matters worse.

When remake an anime from your childhood in a high-tech version... and all you can think is: these girls steal, one of them is engaged to the head of the investigation, yet they walk around barefaced, barearmed, with their hair down, and even with their bare hands? Cameras, fingerprints, facial recognition, DNA... Nothing?

Blah blah, technology is bad. Blah blah, real life is better. Which is like telling animators, blah blah, how awful digital is, better when you did everything by hand.

By the way, the plot is also ironic/hypocritical: playing outside is better... but please, parents, take your kids to the cinema and then sit them in front of the screen in your house to watch our films. Just as it's quite ironic that those who praise the theme of this film...on social media.

The second was the plagiarism of the plagiarism of the plagiarism of fan fiction.

The "third" is embarrassingly banal.

Now we're going from: Is it possible that no one can take a set from him? to Is it possible that no one can take two sets from him, even when he's sick? They didn't seem very bored when Alcaraz dominated, or when he defeated Sinner 4 or 5 times in a row, but if Sinner handed Alcaraz 4 losses in a row... Revolution.

If the problem is the quality of the match, there's a lot more tennis to watch.

If the problem is simply "he always wins before; it wasn't like that, there was variety": Let's see... In 2011, Nadal reached the finals at IW, Miami, Monte Carlo, Madrid, and Rome. Of those, he played (and lost) four against Djokovic. And he obviously won the RG. Very varied. It reminds me of when everyone complained about Sincaraz's too many finals last year (but in 2026 they complained that there weren't enough).

The year before, he had the perfect clay slam (Wimbledon and US), and would have made four clay finals another four times. "Well, that was just one year; in the long run, it wasn't like that." Well, Sinner hasn't been around for ten years, but for two-thirds. These are the Monte Carlo and Rome titles, just to name two. A parade of very different names, I see.

Oh, but those were all very tense matches right down to the last point. Eh, not all. As you can see here, or if you open Wikipedia for the cut score, you'll find that there are many matches in two sets and even many 6/1, 6/2, and also 6/0.

Sinner isn't doing anything that hasn't been done in the past. There have always been dominant players and "weak" moments, but now a lot of mystical nostalgia and simple antipathy toward Sinner have also crept into the arguments. If another player were doing what he's doing, he'd be much better received.

Ninth* King of Rome

No, there's no "more tension" in the killer point at 40/40 instead of advantages; in fact, quite the opposite. At this point, let's flip a coin, because these "improvements" only make the victory more of a matter of luck on two or three points than a battle of merit.

Perhaps, to engage young social media/gamers, we could add some superpowers voted on by the public, or perhaps Instagram-style sketches mid-match...

Not to mention that the most common complaints are that two-set matches (or three-set matches at slams) last too short. Three-, four-, or five-hour battles are exceptions. You don't always have to bow to TV or youth trends for "more popularity" or ""To attract a young audience, we'll change everything ridiculously. We'll lose almost all of our existing audience, but perhaps we'll attract the most fickle segment of young people, those who move on after a month anyway."

Diego Schwartzman should enjoy his retirement instead of enjoying the nickname Pique the Ruiner of Sports.

There are things you can evolve, there are things you must leave as they are, yes, "traditional", because evolving them isn't evolving them, it's ruining them.