em!!

Anti-transgender activists have been pushing a conspiracy theory claim that the YouTube shooting was “transgender violence.”

Four people were injured at the YouTube headquarters in California on Tuesday when Nasim Najafi Aghdam, a video maker upset that the company had stopped paying her ad money, opened fire on workers. 

Aghdam, who was born in Iran and had tens of thousands of followers on social media, took her own life after the attack.

In the wake of the attack, conspiracy theorists have pushed a number of theories about the shooter’s background- and anti-trans feminist campaigners have latched onto a claim that she was transgender.

Both far-right anti-LGBT activists and feminist campaigners who oppose trans rights have latched onto the theory, claiming, without evidence, that Aghdam was a “transgender woman” because the vegan bodybuilder does not look “feminine enough”.

Jennifer James, an activist who heads a campaign to force the UK’s Labour Party to ban transgender women from women-only positions, was among those to make the claim.

She wrote: “The youtube shooter was a man. This was male violence. Name the problem. Men can shoot, rape kill but we have to ‘respect pronouns’. No.”

Ms James doubled down: “So many ppl are still insisting shooter was female. Despite videos, photos, description from youtube HQ. witness.. Why are women forbidden to name male violence? Why are we expected to lie about a killer’s sex?

Another anti-trans feminist on Twitter who goes by the monicker ‘GenderCritXX’ pushed the surreal conspiracy theory.

The user wrote: “They say the shooter is female. Women would never do such a thing. You can guarantee they are not actually female and are just another TIM [Trans-Identified Male].”

The conspiracy theory also spread on internet forum Mumsnet, which has recently become an organising platform for anti-transgender campaigners – with contributors insisting Aghdam was a “Trans-Identified Male.”

One appalled user wrote: “Seriously no wonder people accuse Mumsnet of transphobia.”

The site eventually opted to delete several threads on the subject, with messages from admins insisting the threads were “too speculative at this stage” and in “poor taste.”

"Breathe looks like a thin, cropped tank top with mesh panels to keep the user cool. While it's normally tight fighting, Breathe contains a smart alloy material called Nitone that, when electrified, loosens the garment. It's battery operated and can be adjusted with a remote controller, so the user can discreetly change how tight the binding is -- there's no need to change their clothing or go into a private space in order to take a break. There's also an optional feature that will automatically loosen the device when the user is playing a sport."

RADICAL SATURDAY

these are two pretty well known german tv personalities

palina, the woman on the left here, gets a lot of really gross comments on her body, especially her boobs. stuff like (paraphrased cause they’re in german) “woah, i wanna cum all over those fat tits” or “she’s such a fucking hot slut i wanna fuck those tits” or “with her, half of the guys would cum before reaching her hole” and who can forget “palina, you are and always will be a juicy piece of meat i would drink out of”. and the media tends to really sexualize her too.

so she and klaas (dude on the right), with the help of their team and and lovely ass-model decided to just drop this picture as an instagram, with the caption “finally got that nice necklace with my zodiac”

the media was quick to pick it up as “ah she says its about the necklace but she wants to show her boobs!”, and of course there were more comments like “i jacked off to this like seven times in an hour” and “those tits should milk my cock dry”

ladies invented your favorite science fiction subgenres