Did Van Cortlandt have a 700-yard Hole in 1895?
Of all the things I read about Van Cortlandt’s original layout in 1895, one fact stood out in particular – the original ninth hole was said to be 700 yards long! According to the USGA and R&A’s 2020 "Distance Insight Report," recreational women and men hit drives approximately 75-100 yards and 100-150 yards, respectively, circa 1900. Based on these data, I wondered if the 700-yard number was an exaggeration. Adding to this doubt, I found two contemporaneous descriptions of the original routing that appeared inconsistent as to the length of the final hole.
The routing of the original nine holes at Van Cortlandt roughly formed an upside-down “U” shape (see diagrams above). Holes eight and nine, which ran end-to-end in the same direction for approximately 1000 yards, combined to form the final straight line of the “U”. Based on this design, there was a zero-sum relationship between the length of the two holes. In other words, if the ninth hole was really 700 yards long, the eighth hole could only be about 200-300 yards.
In November of 1896, "The Sun" newspaper published a detailed description of all nine holes at the course. With respect to number eight, listed as 246 yards in a map accompanying the article, the paper wrote: “A long driver should have a great chance from this tee, which is on a slight elevation. There are two of the dirt bunkers on the way to the eighth hole – one close to the tee, which will trap a hooked or pulled drive, and another one close to the green, which is not particularly dangerous. A good score would be a five.”
With respect to number nine, the paper wrote: “A long stretch of rolling turf, crossed by two stone walls and spotted by a dirt bunker near the green, is in view from the ninth tee. The hole is 700 yards, the longest in the United States. The Van Cortlandt record is said to be seven for this hole, which must have been done by clever golf. The drive, unless topped, should clear the first stone wall and a brassey shot come close to the second. Another brassey, or a full swing with a cleek, will get well over the second wall. Unless it goes to the right and into the lake or the tall grass on the bank the lie will be good. If the three shots averaged 180 yards each there will still be 160 yards to play. The attempt should be to get over the bunker, or by it, with either a brassey or cleek, which will leave a margin of three shots to make the hole in seven.”
In May of 1899, the USGA also published a description of each hole at the course in its official bulletin, "Golf." The article described how each of the original holes would be changed when the course expanded from nine to eighteen holes. The USGA’s report of holes eight and nine differs significantly when compared to the analysis in The Sun.
With respect to number eight, the USGA wrote: “The fifteenth – the present eighth – will have a cup bunker with extended ends, guarding the green, which, like its predecessor, will be moved some yards to the left. And, except that the ground to the right will be cleared, there will be no further changes.” The map accompanying the article lists the fifteenth hole as 460 yards. Nothing in the USGA’s description suggests that the eighth hole was only 246 yards long, or that the original hole would nearly double in length during the remodel.
With respect to number nine, the USGA wrote: “At the sixteenth – the present ninth – the sand bunker already spoken of at the sixth hole will trap pulled balls, while a crescent-shaped sand bunker in place of the present one, will guard the green.” The accompanying map lists the sixteenth hole as 550 yards. Nothing in the article suggests that the original hole was purportedly the longest in the United States at 700 yards, or that it would be shortened by more than 150 yards when the course was renovated, facts the otherwise detail-oriented author surely would have referenced.
It's difficult to compare the description in The Sun vis-Ă -vis the analysis by the USGA. Both articles appear to contain detailed and first-hand accounts of the original course layout. With no reason to doubt the credibility of either description, it makes it all the more confusing that the descriptions of the final two holes are so dramatically different in the two publications.
After reading through discussions on Golf Club Atlas, I have one theory about what could have caused the discrepancy between the publications. The two articles were published approximately two-and-a-half years apart. It’s possible that in the intervening years, the original nine holes were renovated. My hunch is that while the original 9th hole may have initially stretched 700 yards, it was significantly shortened to about 550 yards sometime between 1897 and 1899. While a 700-yard hole might sound exciting, given the distance players hit the ball at that time, it was likely a monotonous experience to actually play the hole (albeit with multiple rock walls serving as interesting obstacles).
If anyone has any information regarding the original 9th hole, please let me know. I’d love to find out if my hypothesis is accurate.