I found this research article on dissociative disorders
For more than 30 years, the posttraumatic model (PTM) and the sociocognitive model (SCM) of dissociation have vied for attention and empiric
It's good because its through why the trauma model isn't exactly right it's faults and the sociocognitive models faults. It's how they're both right and wrong at the same time and how we can use those to create a new framework for dissociative disorders.
It's a very interesting read, cause well the debate of Traumagenic vs Endogenic has already being going on with different terms in psychology for decades.
Literally in the article there is "Yet we suggest that the origins of dissociation extend well beyond trauma. Even if trauma were a reliable precursor of dissociative symptoms, which it is not, it would still be necessary to explain (a) why only some individuals who experience highly adverse events experience dissociative disorders, whereas others are resilient, and (b) how such events bring about dissociative phenomena beyond the idea that dissociation occurs solely for defensive purposes. We suggest that the origins of dissociation are multidetermined, differ across individuals, and relate to failures in adaptive mechanisms operative in nontraumatic as well as traumatic circumstances."
Guys i can't believe its not as simple as its caused by trauma or not its both, It's almost like humans are extremely complex
-Apollo
