Fine I'll make a fucking intro post so losers stay off the blog
Main is @awesomenessdoesstuffsometimes . We also have @making-gender (coining blog) . Spam rbs on @the-sides-archive. Owner of anti endo systems community group and Validation Pronouns 2.0 on discord. We also have @aemogai-archive .
Do not use parts language for us ever thanks. Xe/xem collectively
Apollo_DS on most platforms | adult bodied | wasian
List of guys
DNI
Endos, pro endos, "mixed origin", tulpa
Proship , pro harassment, pro censorship
Radqueers / Transid
Anti alterhuman
Those blogs like "pro anti debate" that just rb shit to get more people to bother me
Anti xenos n neos
Fakeclaimers, r/FDC & systemcringe users
Transandrophobes and self proclaimed misandrists
Things I am but don't really care if you interact if u disagree
Pro good faith queer labels
Kink and polyam have a place in queer spaces
Number names exist outside of the context of programming
Pro respectful & educated kin for fun
Anti true crime community
Idgaf about polyminds because they never claimed to be systems or even multiple people and don't want anything to do with us
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
To begin, let’s define what “transid” actually is. According to the official transid website, “A TransID person is an individual who uses identities different from those assigned to them by society based on their physical appearance or bodily experiences.” I will be using this definition as well, with one minor change. “A TransID person is an individual who uses non-gender identities different from those assigned to them by society based on their physical appearance or bodily experiences.”
As for why I made the change, transid advocates often lump transgender identities into their label, and have a tendency to use them as a shield for criticism. However, the core difference between transid and transgender is that gender is an experience based on an internal sense of self, and transids often attempt to claim experiences based on cultural, neurological, or otherwise external things.
The transid.org website lists 18 categories of transids. Because I am thorough, I will be going through each of these below the cut.
!WARNING! certain sections may discuss triggering content, such as:
Bigotry (present in all sections)
ED/weight discussion (in “transbody” section)
Violence (in transharmful and transharmed)
Sexual violence, including rape myths and stereotypes (Especially present in transharmed, mentioned briefly in transharmful)
Transracial/Trace
Perhaps the most mainstream transid, and the one I was able to find the most scholarly works on (including Jana Cattien’s "Against ‘Transracialism’: Revisiting the Debate", which I found very helpful in formulating my arguments). Transracial is defined as, “An umbrella term for those who identify with a race that differs from one's ancestry.” the problem with transracial (at least to me), is two things:
1. The false comparison of race to gender
2. The robbing of the term from transracial adoptees.
To begin, race and gender are not remotely as comparable as transid advocates will have you think they are. Studies in neuroscience and psychology show that gender is based in an internal sense of self, separate from biological sex. One study on transgender individuals showed that brain activation when seeing bodies aligned with their gender identity is the same as cisgender individuals, regardless of whether that body matches up with their biological sex. Racially identity is conceptually different, based on external factors such as ancestry, culture, and history.
It is because of this very difference that the second issue with transracial comes in. The term itself was stolen from transracial adoptees. A transracial adoptee is a person raised by parents of a different race or ethnicity. These people (especially people of color adopted by white families) struggle with identity, racial isolation, and systemic trauma. Stealing this term and changing it to mean something its not only furthers this isolation.
Back in 2015 ex-NAACP chapter president Rachel Dolezal “came out” as transracial, and transracial adoptees spoke out about this. An ABC news article from that time quotes somebody saying that, “‘Many members of the White press have appropriated and co-opted a deeply meaningful, historical term - transracial - from the adoptee community,” Kevin H. Vollmers, Executive Director of Gazillion Strong, told NBC News. “They’re treating ‘transracial’ as though it’s a new thing. As a transracial adoptee, this is, at the very least, a slap in the face,’”
Transbody
Transbody is defined as, “a label for those who identify with having a body type, organs, or some other physical features that they do not currently have.” While this generally falls closer to the “harmless but also useless” category of transids (as opposed to the “genuinely dangerous/bigoted) there was one thing I found concerning while looking through the list of “transbody” identities.
A label known as “edweight,” defined as “a term for those who are transweight because of their eating disorder, or whose transweight identity is otherwise affected by one's ED.” To reduce behaviors of eating disorders down a simple “transweight identity” and not behavior indicative of concern or worry is disturbing. Keep this pattern of reducing mental disorders to identities akin to transness in your head for now, it’ll be discussed upon later.
Transfashion
Transfashion is defined as, “Those who want to be apart of a different aesthetic or fashion.”
In the previous section, I described transids as falling under a spectrum from “useless but harmless” to “dangerous and or bigoted.” While I have nothing to say about this particular transid, I’m going go over my problems with these “harmless but useless” types of ids, and I’ll reference it back when we get to other categories like it.
Radqueers tend to hide behind these identities when transid is critiqued, ignoring the real problems surrounding them.
To add onto that, grouping “identities” like these and real groups like transgender people together under one label is inherently minimizing. The experience of somebody who wants to change their fashion style is nowhere close to the experience of a transgender person.
Because I don’t wish to repeat myself, I will be saying “See: Transfashion,” whenever a “harmless but useless” transid comes up.
Transharmful
Transharmful and its counterpart (transharmed) is one of the more controversial identities within the radqueer community, and for good reason. Transharmful is “an umbrella term for those who identify with some view or lifestyle that carries inherent harm, such as violence or bigotry,” Basically anybody can understand why this isn’t okay.
However, I’d like to bring up a few points against this that most people might have not yet considered.
There is a huge problem with people who identify with being murderers and rapists (the most common themes amongst transharmful people, as almost all of them behave around the same) and trans people. In a world where trans people are consistently painted as dangerous predators by those in power, it’s actively harmful to the transgender community to pretend like transharmfuls are a part of it.
These identities also cause harm to people with intrusive thoughts about hurting others by treating it as an identity, instead of acknowledging that you are not your thoughts. This line of thinking can be harmful to those with OCD, or intrusive thoughts in general.
Transplural
Transplural is defined as “is a large umbrella term describing anyone with the experience of feeling like they should be plural or desire to be plural. It falls under the transid umbrella, and can refer to any form of plurality, including traumagenic, endogenic, disordered, and non-disordered plurality.”
My arguments against transplural are similar to my arguments against endogenic systems, but I’d like to address transplurals who wish to transition into CDD systems. Using neural imaging scans, it revealed that alters within did systems exhibit different patterns of brain activity, even when compared to actors attempting to imitate DID. So no matter how hard these people try, they cannot actually transition to having a CDD.
We will talk more on the neurology of different mental disorders when I get to transdisabled, as I feel it’s more fitting there.
Transsex
…is another pathetic attempt by the radqueer community to rope transgender people into their bullshit, but this time with some added intersexism as well.
Transsex is almost always used by radqueers to identify as transintersex, despite the fact that doing so actively ignores the lived experience of intersex people. Radqueers often argue that it’s akin to transgender people seeking gender affirming surgery, but thats simply not true. Intersex people and transgender people may have similar experiences in some areas, but they aren’t the same.
Transabled
Transabled is a term that leeches off of Body Integrity Dysphoria, where an individual experiences an intense desire to be physically disabled (e.g., amputation, paralysis).
Radqueers have taken this idea and distorted it into something its not. The transid.org website frequently references BID in their definitions for transbled, despite the fact that BID is specific to physical disabilities (particularly amputation), and not mental conditions.
I will admit that you can acquire certain physical disabilities (often through through acts of self harm or mutilation) and doing so would make you physically disabled (general you used) (and please keep in mind that amputation (what radqueers would consider “transitioning” for biid) is considered a last resort)
The same cannot be said about mental health. In the transplural section, I mentioned the neurological differences in the brains of people with did. This is true of many mental health conditions. I’ve provided some links on these differences in the sources. Mental health conditions do not come out of nowhere.
Within the trans disabled community, theres the concept of null-disorder, in which a person identifies as not having a disorder. While I can sympathize heavily with the desire to not experience mental health issues, the radqueer community is so anti-recovery anyways I doubt anything good (like pushing for help or resources) is coming out of those “nullids”.
Transcharacter/Transperson
transcharacter: see transfashion.
As for transperson.. well.. /j. (On a serious note, transperson reminds me of the bah packs of real people. Theres definitely a way that this could be used against people with paranoia of being replaced or watched.)
Transgender
I despise that radqueers tried to bring transgenders into their bullshit, and normally I would just skip this section, but I did see something in their list of transgender identities. “Transtransgender,” where a non trans person identifies as being trans.
In my eyes, this is transphobic, as it implies that trans people are not the gender they identify as. If you are a cis male identifying as “transtransmale,” you are just a cis man.
(NOTE: I am trans. This is not me saying that trans experiences are the exact same as cis experiences)
Translocation
Transitioning to a different location? I’m trans livinginaworldwithnoradqueers,,, /hj. But seriously, this is another harmless but useless. See transfashion.
Transpower/Transskill
Say it with me, harmless but useless!
Transspecies
While I don’t know much, word of mouth has told me that transspecies was a term stolen from alterhuman and therian spaces by radqueers.
Transage
This one is complicated because I can understand feeling like your mentality stuck at a certain age due to PTSD or age regression (however I doubt that is why a lot of radqueers identify with that). When I talked to radqueers about this, they seem to have gotten the idea that age is a social construct. This is not true. Your age is defined by the amount of time you have existed, not your maturity level or intelligence or anything of that matter. While certain maturity levels, cognitive functionings, or behaviors are associated with certain ages, that is because of observed patterns of behavior of those age groups.
Adding onto the trauma aspect, being stuck at a certain mental age due to traumatic experiences isn’t an identity in the way radqueers frame it as. It’s something you can (and deserve to) heal from. (General you used).
Transexperience
Harmless but useless (most of the time). Several labels concern me, but mostly because the cross into ideas mentioned above.
Transharmed
Transharmed, and identities like it, equate the lived experiences of abuse victims into an identity.
(I’m going to be speaking mainly about people who identify as transharmed for any form of sexual abuse, as that is the most common form I see these people use the label). As if being a victim of abuse is a queer label or identity.
I’m going to be quite blunt here, a majority of “transharmed” people identify as such due to a kink or fetish for being treated that way. And frankly, I would rather these people go into kink or fetish communities than claim to be victims. Unlike the radqueer community, these spaces contain safewords, guardrails, and bar minors from entering.
Society is filled with rape apologist and victim blaming logic, and claiming to be a victim of a crime you are not only hurts real survivors who are often accused of lying.
To add on, I’ve noticed from observing the tags that a lot of “transharmed” individuals fall back on rape myths or other harmful rhetoric. This only further contributes to my theory that these people do not listen to victims of abuse, and instead fall back on preconceived (and often malicious) rhetoric.
In the case where a transharmed person actually has experienced that abuse before, that is not an identity. It is something you can, and deserve to, recover from. Even if somebody isn’t mentally ready to recover, internalizing being harmed as a core part of your identity will make recovery harder if they choose to do so. A major step in my own recovery was teaching myself to be a person again.
Transmentality
Can fall between the range of “harmless but useless” (Just play it…?) to “Paradox of tolerance case study A”. The radqueer community should really learn about the nazi bar analogy.
Transreglious/Transfaith
Generally harmless but useless UNLESS the identity is specific to cults. Then it falls under the same criticisms I have for transharmed.
Transtime
Harmless but useless unless you are specifically transtime because you wish to return to an oppressive time period. Then see my opinions on transharmed/harmful.
Sources
All definitions and lists of transids found on https://transid.org.
Majid, D S Adnan et al. “Neural Systems for Own-body Processing Align with Gender Identity Rather Than Birth-assigned Sex.” Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) vol. 30,5 (2020): 2897-2909. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhz282
“Adoptees to Rachel Dolezal: You’re Not Transracial.” NBC News, 17 June 2015, www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/adoptees-rachel-dolezal-youre-not-transracial-n377121.
Transharmful:
“You Are Not Your Thoughts.” International OCD Foundation, 10 Nov. 2017, iocdf.org/blog/2017/11/10/you-are-not-your-thoughts/.
Transplural:
Lebois, Lauren A M et al. “"I Am Not I": The Neuroscience of Dissociative Identity Disorder.” Biological psychiatry vol. 91,3 (2022): e11-e13. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.11.004
Schlumpf, Yolanda R et al. “Dissociative part-dependent biopsychosocial reactions to backward masked angry and neutral faces: An fMRI study of dissociative identity disorder.” NeuroImage. Clinical vol. 3 54-64. 12 Jul. 2013, doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.07.002
Transsex:
While I’m normally against linking tumblr or social media, I do recommend searching up intersexism and listening to what intersex people have to say.
Nadeau, Nadia. “Successful treatment of body integrity dysphoria with amputation: A case report.” Clinical case reports vol. 12,4 e8720. 27 Mar. 2024, doi:10.1002/ccr3.8720
Donovan, Alex P A, and M Albert Basson. “The neuroanatomy of autism - a developmental perspective.” Journal of anatomy vol. 230,1 (2017): 4-15. doi:10.1111/joa.12542
Horn, Karen, et al. “Neurobiology of Mental Disorders.” Fundamentals of Clinical Psychiatry: A Practical Handbook. Ed. Marsal Sanches and Jair C. Soares. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2025. 27–38. Print.
Transspecies
Again, I’m going on word of mouth here, if anybody could provide some sources on anti endos taking transspecies from alterhuman communities, please reblog!
Transage
Dictionary.com. “The Definition of Age.” Www.dictionary.com, 2018, www.dictionary.com/browse/age.
Marie, Simone. “Emotionally Stuck at the Age of Trauma: Signs, Causes, and Healing.” Psych Central, 5 Jan. 2022, psychcentral.com/ptsd/signs-trauma-has-you-stuck.
Clinic, Cleveland. “Age Regression: What It Is, Causes, Signs & Treatment.” Cleveland Clinic, 16 Jan. 2026, my.clevelandclinic.org/health/symptoms/age-regression.
Transharmed
"Victim Blaming" (PDF). Canadian Resource Centre for Victims of Crime.
Bieneck, Steffen; Krahé, Barbara (June 2011). "Blaming the Victim and Exonerating the Perpetrator in Cases of Rape and Robbery: Is There a Double Standard?". Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 26 (9): 1785–1797.
“10 Myths about Sexual Assault.” CRCC, clevelandrapecrisis.org/resources/resource-library-2/featured/rape-myths/.
Besides what you said, transracial is also harmful because it’s mostly based on stereotypes. For example, “transJapanese” people will use eating sushi or watching anime as “affirming” behavior. Similar to transdisabled, they also appropriate the suffering that poc go through.
yes, transspecies was originally for alterhuman communities. Here’s the wiki if you want a definition. But in short, I’ve had a conversation with a transspecies person before, and the definition they gave me was something like “changing your body to be more similar to an animal, such as getting a tattoo of claws on your hands, or just identifying with a specific animal”
Minors often identify as trans age to older; rqs use this as an Excuse to essentially groom them.
(Most importantly imo) the listed “harmless but useless” identities aren’t ACTUALLY harmless, since they spread false ideas about what it means to be trans, and implies trans people Aren’t actually what they are, just a person wanting to be something else.
Adding a little bit- the "harmless but useless" transids have SO many non appropriative (of trans people) alternatives, aldernic, dissomei, and even desirdae to name a few. There is no excuse for "harmless Transid" users to not just use these instead of claiming similarity to transgender people.
I highly recommend showing hate anons to your partner or someone close to you so you can clown on them without posting them and validating the anon, followed by blocking and deleting them
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
By the way its perfectly normal to not know why an alter split. it doesnt make you “mixed origin”. I do not know the exact reason why I split. I know for certain that we are still a pwcdd. that doesnt mean u fall into endo nonsense. dont let them tell you that.
The endogenic community uses pwCDDs amnesia, poor internal communication, and lack of understanding a lot about themselves as avenues to peddle their mystical misinformation
as much as i genuinely think pro endo cdd systems are shooting themselves in the foot by aligning themselves with the shitty remains of a cdd hate group, they belong in cdd spaces. they DONT belong in anti-endo spaces. but they belong in cdd spaces. They may be idiots, but they belong in cdd spaces.
If you don't mind me asking, if you don't think endos/willos are pretending to have a CDD, why are you anti-endo?
(Totally cool if you don't answer, I know you said you were burnt out on it a bit)
I’m fine with being asked this, I’m actually surprised I wasn’t asked this sooner haha. Be prepared for a yap fest I have a,, lot of thoughts on this from seeing every argument under the sun.
I consider myself anti endo because of the well-researched fact that fully autonomous states of identity with different perceived motor function, thinking patterns, etc. occurring in a single brain is not possible without structural dissociation and extreme compartmentalization. Even in brains with lower levels of structural dissociation, it is nowhere near the complex presentation of alters seen in DID or even OSDD, so I have a hard time believing that someone could have something so similar without the necessary parameters. Even in disordered systems who reach functional multiplicity, as soon as those barriers are 100% gone (as in, the dissociative barriers no longer exist), the alters cannot keep their separation and they fuse. (This is why functional multiplicity is the final step before final fusion!) The brain was not made to house alters. So, if endogenic systems apparently have no disorder in regard to alters, how are they not constantly experiencing fusion? Do they even have small amounts of dissociative barriers to dissolve? (I’ll expand more on the scientific/psychological aspect of this further along)
I also consider myself anti endo because of the glaring issues within the pro endo community, and while I understand every community will have issues, it’s almost impossible to ignore them in that particular community.
There is a huge stigma around just… not being plural. There’s been a lot of recent backlash on singlets for having an opinion on syscourse. The community is also constantly telling these people they could be plural, or they should become plural, or they need to get more plural! I’ve seen pwCDDs talk about how endogenic spaces told them to just split more alters, or “undo” fusions or alter dormancy. Encouraging alter elaboration and development way too early can lead to trauma leakage and symptoms worsening. Endogenic spaces are not safe for those with CDDs because of the way they talk about having alters.
There’s also the constant encouragement for nontraumagenic systems to use the exact same terms as CDD systems, which hammers in the point that disordered people cannot have their own exclusive terms. This is an issue for countless disabilities, for example the phrase “going non-verbal”. There’s also issues of flat out ignoring science entirely, with a small group of (pro) endos confidentially claiming that endogenic systems can be diagnosed with DID because “trauma isn’t a criteria”. Which… if you have any ounce of medical literacy you would understand why. You can’t expect people to report trauma for the “I forgot my trauma” disorder, upon other reasons.
Regardless of what I think about endogenic systems, and if they truly do exist (which I will say they do for the sake of this argument) CDD systems and nontraumagenic systems would function radically differently, so why are we sharing terms? Furthermore, how do nontraumagenic systems have things like, say, alter roles? The reason alters have roles in CDDs is because we are fractured parts of a whole made for a specific task (or multiple tasks) that non-CDD havers can just… do as part of their successful integration. A singlet can learn to healthily compartmentalize something that stresses them out, and may come back to it later when they’re ready to face that stressor (this is a generous example and I know not every singlet functions like this 100%). CDD systems have compartmentalization that looks something like this:
Alter A cannot handle a certain stressor due to their functioning. The brain recognizes this and makes alter B handle it. The stressor gets handled successfully because alter B is the part of the brain that was made to handle it.
Or, alternatively, alter A is forced to handle the stressor, but does so terribly because they aren’t made for it, so the brain splits alter C in response. So, next time that stressor happens, alter C can handle it more effectively.
(Again, generous example used from my own experience as a pwUDD + research on the topic and not every system will have the exact same experience)
So, how would this work in someone who is nontraumagenic and doesn’t experience complex compartmentalization? Theoretically, headmates in nontraumagenic systems should be able to function more similarity to a bunch of singlets in one body, or like someone putting on a “mask” to handle a certain thing (since endogenic headmates aren’t dissociated parts of the self). But uh… somehow no. I’ve never seen an endogenic system describe it like that, they’ve only ever described it as seen in CDDs… which is strange, to say the least.
I’ve seen the argument that headmates in nontraumagenic systems are separated by dissociation, just not structural dissociation, and to that I say read over paragraph 2. So, even that doesn’t really explain it. If you’ve dissociated from a part of yourself so badly that it develops its own sense of self, that’s no longer healthy dissociation. It does not make sense.
The last thing I’m going to say about the psychological aspect is, again, if nontraumagenic plurality is 100% possible and functions differently than traumagenic plurality: how come I’ve never seen any traumaendo system explain the differences between their traumagenic and endogenic alters? Is there any difference? If not, how would that be possible? (Fun fact: pwCDDs don’t always split from trauma, you can split anytime the brain deems it necessary, it doesn’t make you traumaendo. Your experiences were enough, I promise you.)
So, moving on from the largely psychological aspect of my opinion, I’m going to address the identity and cultural/spiritual aspect for the case of nontraumagenic plurality, because I know that’s a huge part of the community.
Many nontraumagenic plurals view their plurality as an identity, a way to view yourself. Which, honestly? I would be fine with that, that’s not inherently a bad concept.
…If it wasn’t for the fact that they act like this identity label is near identical to having parts of your brain literally separated by extreme dissociation. Again, this brings up the issue of using the exact same terminology as those with a CDD. My alters are not an identity label, or a way of viewing my sense of self, they are a physical manifestation of the stress and trauma we’ve collectively been through for our entire life. They are a symptom. Heck, there are brain scans showing differences in alter activity! How is that in any way comparable to an identity label that, theoretically, shouldn’t physically exist in the brain like alters in CDDs? Trans and gay people don’t significantly different brain activity, so why would nontraumagenic plurality have that as well? Or, again, how is that comparable? Why would an identity label that anyone can take on work exactly the same way as a complex symptom of a disorder?
And, now, there’s the spiritual aspect of it. Which I don’t have much to comment on, other than once again, why use terms meant to describe a disordered experience to describe something that should be incredibly personal? Spirituality and cultural practices should not be compared to those with CDDs, even the DSM-5 addresses this. They can look similar to an outsider, but fundamentally, they are completely different. We do not need to share terms for entirely different experiences, it doesn’t help either of our communities.
I likely missed some things, I also answered this in a more summarized way (with sources) in this post(link) if you’re interested in seeing that as well.
If you want a shorter version of all of the above: I deem saying you have alters without trauma comparable to saying you have flashbacks without trauma. Both are symptoms, but both have a concrete and direct cause. You can have symptoms that look similar to a specific disorder, but you’re not going to have the exact same presentation, intensity, etc. Especially not one that is this complex.
Ultimately, I’m going to say this: the day a full-proof mechanism for endogenic alter development is proposed, and the community stops acting like our experiences of multiplicity are the exact same, is the day I will consider calling myself pro endo. Or at the very least, endo neutral.
*final note: do not try to debate me on my opinion regarding this. Like I said at the start, I’ve seen every argument under the goddamn sun, I can guarantee you’re not going to change my mind. I answered this question because it was a good one, and it was asked respectfully. If you want to fight, take it elsewhere.
I’m very welcoming to polite corrections regarding information on CDDs. Please let me know if I’m accidentally spreading misinformation! (With sources please)
Real real real real real I will never understand how people can grasp things like special interests being autistic exclusive and fps being personality disorder exclusive (when both of those are generally much simpler concepts that are easy for NTs to confuse with their experiences) but then suddenly pwCDDs are gatekeeping and evil for explaining that being a system is exclusive to us
Id love to like radnormal but I don't understand why anyone would be neutral on harassment like come on . I also don't like the "some people are irredeemable" thing or the confusing para stance but like whatever
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
genuinely the worst endogenic take ive seen recently
thought u guys were all about lived experiences huh?? or does that only matter when it comes to people who agree with you? but yeah somebody you dislike using a widespread term doesnt mean they suddenly dont have those things. these arent niche endo exclusive labels anyways. they r right tho im not traumagenic i have a mental disorder. endos hop off my dick 4 once omg
IMG: If you are anti-endo, you do not have fictives. You do not have hosts. You are not traumagenic. You aren't a lot of things. Why? Because you are using terms made by endos. If you hate them oh, so much, you can make your own terms. You are nothing, and would be nothing, if it wasn't for the endogenic systems you call fake. Have a horrible fucking day, I hope you get hit by a truck. /END ID
First of all: a core isn’t a thing in systems. A child starts off with multiple ego states who either integrate before the age of 9, or are kept apart by structural dissociation.
And fictives “going back to their source”? That’s not possible. At all. A fictional introject is from a fictional world that doesn’t exist. You cannot go somewhere that doesn’t exist.
Every day I’m baffled by the insanity of these terms endos come up with. They live in a false reality if they truly believe they can travel to fictional worlds through a “portal” in their “system.”
I have oc alters that used to believe they were going "back to source" when they were really just recreating places and people in headspace/immersive daydreaming, that's likely what this person was experiencing.
This experience (and for the record, core theory as well) is something I believed when I was pro endo. Endos "inclusivity" is a lie bc they actually significantly narrow what "counts as" or "is possible in" CDDs to convince people they're endos.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Hosting a server for nonwhite DID/OSDD/UDD systems with my partner to have a safe space to gather as POC and as systems. Please note that you need to be 18+ to join and would prefer end*genic systems to not join since this is a space for disordered systems of color.
Check out the nonwhite system hangout community on Discord - hang out with 8 other members and enjoy free voice and text chat.
this is my system blog @the-sides-dimension - Tumblr Blog | Tumlook
