A Palestinian-owned cafĂŠ in Oakland, California kicked out a Jewish customer for wearing a blue hat with a Star of David on it, claiming that the symbol was âviolent.â
This is a clear violation of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Californiaâs Unruh Civil Rights Act. Note that this applies even if the Jewish customer went to the cafĂŠ expecting that something like this would happen (in other words, âhe tricked us into discriminating against him!â is not a legitimate defense).
 Itâs also worth noting this cafĂŠ has menu items titled âSweet Sinwarâ and âiced in tea fadaâ and its menu is decorated with the Hamas inverted red triangle. The cafĂŠ also openly expresses support for the October 7 massacre.
What do you do when under fire for antisemitism? You tokenize (Not So) âJewishâ Voice for âPeace,â which openly supports terrorism against Jews and has even glorified Nazis in the past. For more, see my posts âStop Sharing JVPâ and âTime To Talk About JVPâŚAgain.â
For those of us familiar with Jewish history and the history of antisemitism, this is par for the course. In the 1920s, the Soviet Jewish âYevsektsiyaâ made it its mission to destroy âtraditional Jewish life, the Zionist movement, and Hebrew culture.â The fact that the Yevsektsiya was âJewishâ was central to its purpose. After all, the Soviet regime couldnât be accused of antisemitism when those shutting down all Jewish cultural and spiritual life were Jews themselves.
Historically there have been, arguably, two kinds of antisemitism: (1) Nazi antisemitism, in which Jews are physically exterminated, and (2) Hanukkah antisemitism, in which the antisemite does not necessarily intend to take our lives, but rather, seeks to strip Jews of all the elements which make us...well, Jews.
Under the Soviet regime, for example, Jews suffered from âHanukkah antisemitism.â The Soviets heavily suppressed Jewish cultural and spiritual life, stripping many Jewish families of thousands of yearsâ worth of history. Speaking or studying Hebrew was punishable by law. So was participating in Jewish religious traditions. At the same time, Jews were unable to assimilate into Soviet society due to their ethnic background. Jews were often imprisoned under false pretenses, accused of vague âZionist crimes.â People with Jewish last names were subject to highly restrictive university quotas or banned from performing certain jobs.
Maybe youâve noticed a pattern over the past year. First, it was only âZionism,â not Judaism, that was a problem, despite the fact that the Jewish connection to -- and desire for sovereignty in -- the Land of Israel is inextricable from 3000 years of Jewish tradition. Then, they started denying our extensively recorded history and origins in Israel. At anti-Zionist Jewish events, now praying in Hebrew is considered âtoo triggering,â so itâs best to pray in colonial languages, like Arabic or English. Now, the Magen David is a âracist, genocidal symbol,â to quote Palestinian activist Mohammed El-Kurd.
Do you not see whatâs happening? This is no longer about the State of Israel, the Israeli government, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, or this current war. This is a thinly-veiled effort to methodically legitimize the discrimination of Jews -- and anything Jewish.
The Star of David, also known as the Magen David or the Seal of Solomon, is mentioned in Jewish texts as early as the first century. In fact, itâs found in coins from the period of the Bar Kokhba Revolt against the Romans (132-135 CE). It was also used as a decorative motif in the Khirbet Shura synagogue in the Galilee in the third century. Though initially merely used as an ornament, the Magen David was ascribed deeper spiritual meanings since the 11th century. It has since been associated with Kabbalah, or Jewish mysticism. Â
In the 17th century, the Jewish community of Prague was ascribed the Magen David as its official symbol. Shortly thereafter, the Jewish community in Vienna also adopted it as a marker. By the 19th century, the Star of David was the distinctive Jewish emblem.
More than anything, perhaps, the Star of David is a symbol of Jewish resilience and survival. For centuries, Jews in Europe and the Islamic world had been forced to wear distinguishing clothes marking them as Jews. After the Nazis invaded Poland in 1939, Jews in Poland and in other Axis-occupied territories were forced to wear a Star of David, most often seen in the form of a yellow badge with the word âJudeâ (Jew) or a similar variation. Therefore, for many Jews, the act of wearing Star of David jewelry or clothing is a reclamation of our ancient symbol that was once weaponized to oppress us.
Hundreds of millions of people have been slaughtered under the banner of Christianity and Islam each. The Crusades alone took about 1.7 million lives. The Spanish Inquisition? Up to 300,000 lives. In the âNew World,â some 56 million Indigenous people were killed in the name of Christianity. These are just a few examples. Itâs estimated Islamâs conquests alone left some 270 million people dead.Â
During the First Jewish Revolt, the Romans crucified some 500 Jews a day. Yet I would never dream of denying someone service at a coffee shop because theyâre wearing a crucifix.Â
When Jihadists carry out terrorist attacks, they shout âAllahu Akbarâ â the same phrase used by the 1.8 billion Muslims around the world in their daily prayers. Muslims recite the Shahada prayer daily, the same prayer that is inscribed in the ISIS, Hamas, and Al Qaeda flags. And yet, I would never dream of denying someone service at a coffee shop because theyâre a Muslim who says âAllahu Akbarâ or recites the Shahada prayer.
Under Islamist regimes, such as the Islamic Republic in Iran, women are beat to death for not wearing hijab or wearing hijab âimproperly.â But I think you would agree that denying a woman in hijab service at a coffee shop on account of the Islamic Republicâs crimes is plain bigotry.
You may be triggered by crosses, hijabs, or the Star of David, and your triggers may be rooted in valid trauma. But your triggers are no oneâs responsibility to deal with but your own, and they are no excuse to lash out in bigotry.
Even if Israelâs actions were equivalent to those of Nazi Germany, equating the Star of David with the Nazi hakenkreuz (commonly misidentified as the âswastikaâ) is an inherently problematic analogy.
Unlike the Star of David and the Jewish people, the swastika has zero spiritual or cultural significance in German culture beyond Nazism.Within the German context, the Nazi hakenkreuz means one thing and one thing only.
On the other hand, the Sanskrit swastika and other similar symbols, such as the whirling log, have long, rich traditions in their respective cultures. While some Native American tribes have decided to retire the whirling log, others continue to use it. The Sanskrit swastika is commonplace in countries such as India and Nepal.Â
Sure, if someone with zero cultural connection to the swastika or the whirling log decides to âreclaimâ the symbol, Iâd probably do a double take and consider it an antisemitic dogwhistle. But when I went to India, I saw the swastika everywhere, and because I am capable of critical thinking, I was easily able to recognize that the symbol has an entirely different connotation in this particular cultural context, despite my personal and family trauma.
A NOTE ON HOLOCAUST INVERSION
Holocaust inversion is a rhetorical tool used to portray Jews as morally equivalent â or worse â than Nazis. Itâs often employed in discussions about Israel-Palestine and is frequently used by anti-Zionists.
 To understand why Holocaust inversion is unquestionably antisemitic, we must first understand what Holocaust denial actually is. Holocaust denial is not just an outright denial that the events of the Holocaust happened, but more often than not, itâs a denial of well-established facts about the Holocaust. For example, someone who says the Holocaust didnât happen at all is as much a Holocaust denier as someone who claims the Holocaust did happen, but only one million Jews were killed. Â
Therefore, Holocaust inversion is always Holocaust denial, because:Â
(1) it relies on the minimization of established facts about the Holocaust. However harrowing the humanitarian crisis in Gaza â and it is â itâs just in no way equivalent in scale, scope, and methods to the atrocities committed during the Holocaust. This is a historical fact, and denying it is denying the Holocaust.
(2) characterizing Jews â Zionist or not â as Nazis is a denial of the well-established fact about the Holocaust that the predominant force in Nazi ideology was genocidal Jew-hatred. Jews cannot be the inheritors of Nazism simply because the Nazis wanted all Jews exterminated. A denial of this basic fact is Holocaust denial.
For a full bibliography of my sources, please head over to my Instagram and  Patreon.Â
I sincerely donât understand how thereâs still Jews out there who still make excuses for these people, who donât see whatâs happening. Learn your history. Have some self-respect.