song so mi enjoyer

moving out this friday! my parking ticket never got appealed, so i'm gonna be a little short. thank you for all of the shares and donations so far, and i can't believe i made it to the home stretch

okay so i got another fucking parking ticket. i hate this university. can i fucking live.

andor rewatchposting oh my lord i forgot how bad mon needs to get some action. she's tweaking out the whole time. let her have a controversial younger girlfriend goddammit. this is what zero pussy does to a mf

its 100 degrees, even $1 will help <3

😢🫶🏽 grateful for any help <3

hey i have an autoimmune disease (sjogren’s) that makes joint pain and inflammation really bad and affects my mobility especially during flare ups, been in a lot of pain, even a little help will go a long way <3

grateful for any help <3

I am giving this one more desperate try. I need help urgently, the more time that passes the more likely I'll have to buy more expensive pain meds and have to start fundraising all over. Please help a trans woman who has been harassed about needing help.

got a sweater order (thank you!!) but i apparently owe stripe $90 so it basically ate it. aaauuhghh. still need some help, just enough to last me like a week or two!!

i actually don't think it's a bad faith nonequivalent argument to point out that artists are perfectly capable of holding a moral stance about what they will produce and sell when it comes to AI, but not when it comes to gambling or sweatshop labor. i can't really imagine why being righteously opposed to AI is just natural regardless of whatever hypothetical financial benefits could be gained from it, but expecting a similar stance towards extractive business practices or exploitative labor conditions is some sort of unbelievably high bar to meet. Why? Can anyone explain to me why other than pure, naked self interest from artists that AI is a more legitimate moral concern than those other two things?