jud holding his hands behind his back when he's being cute and approachable because he sees them as weapons. the constant self-restraint. the overcompensation to make himself seem as harmless as possible.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Some people have juxtaposed Grace with Martha, Vera, and Simone. But I'd like to compare Grace and Jefferson.
Spoilers below the cut for Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery
Grace Wicks gif from @bumblingeditor
Grace: has a child out of wedlock and surrenders the raising of her son to her father, washing her hands off of that responsibility.
Jeff: has a child out of wedlock and surrenders the raising of his son to his devoted friend and sheep who immediately passes on the responsibility to Vera.
Grace: is trapped by the temptation her father has offered--stay in Chimney Rock and inherit the fortune after he passes.
Jeff: is trapped by hatred and his grandfather's fire-and-brimstone sermons--can only dream of escaping Chimney Rock once he finds out about the diamond.
Grace: stays in Chimney Rock but doesn't connect with her kid; just like Prentice doesn't connect with her. He's written her off after she had a child.
Jeff: stays in Chimney Rock while his biological son Cy is in the same place for 20 years. He doesn't connect with Cy (until Vera outs him); just like Grace never reached out to Jeff.
Grace: driven to extreme lengths of greed and frustration in search for the diamond, ends up assaulting a child (who taunts her), and then dies due to alleged brain aneurysm (struck down by god's mercy as Martha says)
Jeff: driven to extreme lengths of his own deep-rooted hatred and bigotry, grows greedy, ends up burning bridges with his flock, airs out their confessions… and then is killed after indulging in the drink (struck down by satan as Martha says)
Jefferson has done many of the things Grace has done and then some. It's sheer irony that he calls her a harlot whore, and calls Cy's mother "loose" when by his own definition of those terms, Wicks is ALSO a harlot whore and loose!
I like the consistency of Prentice, Grace, and Jefferson all dying due to their greed, hate, and pain. In one of the last scenes, Cy's lawyer calls him Mr. Wicks. Cy changed his name from Draven to Wicks to have a greater legal hold on the diamond. Pretty sure Cy will go the same way as his father, grandmother, and great-grandfather, (not to mention Martha, Samson, and Dr. Nat) if he never lets up the devious search for the diamond. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree after all ;)
And notice how only one of the four Wicks' is demonized as being of bad character when all of them have a whole range of faults. it's the misogyny
Can we talk about how, the first bad omen of Jud's great new opportunity is that the crucifix is literally missing?
And can we talk about how, by opening the door, Wicks' shadow takes the crosses' (or Jesus'?) place? The way Jefferson preaches not about God but his ego?
And can we talk about how Jud then later replaces him after he was murdered? In that specific scene, how he says he was happy about Wick's death?
I'm new to analysis because I haven't actively been watching movies until like - last year??
But considering Jesus was hung on that cross to signify the sacrifice he made to the world.. This feels significant.
Jefferson is a false priest. He makes himself out to be a hero, to take on the burden of his parish of sinners and carry them through in the name of the fight that the church is in against the world.
Jud is different - like a proper priest, he refuses to judge but wants to embrace these people in spite of how hard they try to push him out. He understands and he wants to save them from the path Wicks had set out for them. It was a dead end.
You can see it as him taking on that burden of the indoctrinated flock's rejection but prevailing anyway because of his love for humanity. He loves this people for their humanity and wants to preserve what is left of it despite Jefferson's teachings. He incriminated himself for concealing the Monsignor's drinking even though everyone knew, just to protect Samson who was 'the one good person' in that place as Jud stated himself.
But what does it say about him, the supposed good guy, when he is happy about someone else's brutal death? Sure, guy was an asshole, and maybe he had it coming, but Jud knows what murder is like. He has been through it before. He was supposed to leave his old selfish ugliness behind..
But doesn't it speak to his irrevocable human nature? Yes, a priest needs to maintain a certain distance from things so he can focus on serving God completely, but they are fundamentally human. With urges and guilt that they confess to be rid of them. And isn't Jud ultimately human, despite his call towards a greater purpose?
Is this anything?? pls pls pls feel free to add I'd love to discuss this little symbolic detail!!
a lot of people have talked about how much they love the way father jud talks to louise (same) but it seems like i'm the only one who got really excited about him unceremoniously shutting the door on blanc to do it. tbh it took me a bit to figure out why that hit me so hard.
it's about boundaries and autonomy. it's like he's saying: i will happily defer to you in most things, but this is a hard line. my work is a part of my life you can't touch. and blanc doesn't. they don't try to change each other and they respect each other's domains.
visual levels and vulnerability in wake up dead man
hi hello. if your insanity is of a similar flavor to mine and you've seen this movie a couple times (or a hundred), you will have noticed just how often shots with blanc and jud together have jud much lower in the frame despite being physically taller. people have made compilations and gifsets, and i love that, thank you all so much.
this post is me "yes, and"-ing. because the asymmetry conveys a lot - and the moments where the pattern breaks convey just as much, if not more.
the basic language
this movie did not invent the wheel so let's just start with the assumptions:
jud low in frame looking up at blanc = vulnerability, emotional turmoil, dependence, power differential, being seen, being led
and keep them in mind as we look at specific scenes.
spoilers below for the entirety of the movie basically. also, this post is very long.
a couple disclaimers:
i'm not generally a cinematography nerd, and in all likelihood i have missed something or gotten it wrong. i noticed a very clear throughline and didn't see anyone online talk about it in as much detail as it deserves, so i took it upon myself.
i know there is also very interesting framing in non-blanc scenes (people have talked about wicks consistently being shot in low angle for example, in contrast to how jud is framed against the flock), but that's outside the scope of this post. i'm just interested in comparing blanc and jud when they're in scenes together right now.
there is also a lot going on in conjunction with the blocking (dialogue, lighting, set design) that i may occasionally mention but not discuss in depth.
apologies for how crunchy the screenshots are, i was taking and editing them essentially on a potato.
let's begin.
first meeting
jud is at his lowest moment, in the depths of guilt and despair. he is kneeling on the floor praying (as blanc will soon point out, he's been kneeling a bit too much). he is crying. the line preceding blanc's entrance is "jesus, help me. show me the way through this, please." explicitly framing him as a godsend.
blanc bursts in and asks if jud is alright. jud says yes, picks himself up off the floor and pulls himself together. they have a conversation that is equal parts friendly debate and jud getting blanc to open up in a really disarming way. during this exchange jud is standing (though hunching a bit to seem more approachable) and they're both shot from similar angles.
then jud starts crying again and he sits down. "i'll lose my purpose and i'm frightened, i don't know how i'll live" he says (also, note the way this frame is basically split in two, with jud trapped in the dark half).
blanc stands over him, until he sits down as well, bringing himself to jud's level as he offers help and compassion. after jud mentions blanc's fame, and as blanc starts talking from a place of authority, about the case and what he wants jud to do, he stands up again.
so already you can probably understand my excitement. the asymmetry is here for sure, but it's not static. it's like a dance, the way they step up and down when it's thematically correct.
the body, the murder weapon, the crime scene
at the beginning of the morgue scene jud is trying real hard to hang in there, he's standing. at the end however it gets too much and he collapses.
blanc crouches down to talk to jud, an attempt at grounding, but he's still higher in frame, and jud is trapped between him and the wall, looking up. it's intense, but measured. the word that comes to mind is containment.
what blanc does here works, because jud affirms he wants to help.
in the next scene at the bar jud and blanc exist in a strange inbetween in the established language. jud starts out sitting while blanc is standing, but he's sitting on a really tall chair, so it's not very noticeable. then he stands next to blanc, but he bends down and around him looking at what he's showing, so it doesn't quite read as equal. i would describe this blocking as transitional.
a scene over we have the gorgeous creation of adam shot, where jud kneels for no reason as he hands blanc the book list and they talk about it. notably though, he's not in emotional turmoil here, he's focused and helpful. it's not a collapse, it's chosen deference.
when they begin to inspect the crime scene, blanc is higher still - this time not because jud is lowered, but because blanc is elevated. they're both standing up straight, but blanc is standing on a platform. remember these steps. these steps are gonna come back in a major way.
blanc gets really into the process, and he verbally directs jud to sit down. jud stands up himself when he feels he has something to contribute.
also, here we have our first brief moment of jud actually being higher in frame, when blanc crouches to inspect the floor of the closet and jud looks in. this comes with jud asking a question that is extremely inconvenient for blanc ("what's possibility four?"), so it's like narrative control is momentarily destabilized.
later on we have some shots of jud close to the ground and blanc standing in the doorway surveying, so it felt important to note the inverse.
jud lowers himself one last time in this scene, to comfort martha when she collapses to the floor. blanc, of course, doesn't step down at all.
by this point he's shown that he's willing to (briefly) come down to jud's level, but he wouldn't do the same for martha. his compassion is selective. maintaining distance and authority is more important.
jud's lead
a short but illustrative scene: jud has a very solid idea that seems to be getting them somewhere, and he starts this scene so excited about that, standing next to blanc.
when it turns out to not be what jud thought and blanc admits the case still looks impossible, jud says "you told me you could solve it. i put my faith in you... oh god..." and he sits down, head in hands.
blanc keeps a hand on his shoulder, and then is the one who urges him to stand up. he was the driving force behind the descent, and so he is with the ascent.
so the dynamic of jud becoming dependent on blanc's guidance is verbalized, then immediately demonstrated physically.
the flask confrontation
i love this part of the movie a lot, so i'm gonna spend a lot of words on it.
after getting spooky in the car, blanc sits jud down to write out the story of the murder. despite being freaked out earlier, and despite very much having things to hide, jud does it without hesitation. (thank you to the person who pointed out their poses in this shot echo the painting of an angel and a shipwreck in the background...)
as jud writes, blanc sits down to wait (very comfortably). then blanc sits down to read it, while jud lies on the couch, now the one waiting (very uncomfortably). and it's just a long stretch of these two people being in different parts of the same room, not talking, but communicating in an extremely intimate way.
when blanc finishes reading and figures out the lie by omission, that jud stole a key piece of evidence, he stands up and looks down at jud, who is lying on the couch. the visual asymmetry is maybe the strongest it's ever been. tensions are high, it's a very vulnerable moment for jud, and blanc is trying to contain his anger.
jud sits up to talk to him, but he barely gets any higher. he's folded like an accordion. he starts out not meeting his gaze.
blanc doesn't lead in with an accusation, he leads in with an attempt to understand. when asked a direct question, instead of giving a direct answer jud asks a reframing question in return ("why did i think i could lie to you and get away with it?") and finally looks up at blanc when he does.
he does attempt to argue back and defend his decision, though he doesn't stand up. that's when blanc can't contain the anger anymore and he starts yelling and throwing papers. jud goes quiet and lowers his gaze again.
they go up to jud's room to get the flask but it's not there. jud is crouching on the floor here and blanc is standing in the doorway looking in.
jud stands up to launch into a half-apology, half-excuse, but blanc shoots it down. the dynamic is pushed against. the dynamic holds.
as his fuckup actually sinks in, jud sits down on his bed. the wall next to it is sloped and blanc is advancing and looming so it looks really claustrophobic.
and what does jud do directly after the roughest, least comfortable prolonged interaction these two have had?
he falls asleep. finally. and blanc finally comes down and sits on the foot of his bed. the confrontation resolves into something softer.
the control held, but so did the trust.
we don't get to know how long they stayed like that. the cut is to much later when both are upright.
investigative teamwork
after jud gets that off his conscience and finally gets some sleep, and as we get to the middle of the movie, we've hit a turning point, and the blocking shifts.
we no longer have all these shots of jud lowered or crowded, looking up at blanc. for the scenes where blanc and jud talk to the flock, to cy, and tear apart the jewel box, they are level and mostly placed side by side. jud is keeping up, he's proactive, he's angry, and it shows up in his posture and how he's framed.
i am gonna track when the new pattern breaks because it's interesting...
he lowers to the floor to talk to cy. as in the earlier conversation with martha, blanc continues to stand over them both, and he's shot in low angle. jud prioritizes meeting people where they are. blanc prioritizes having a complete impartial view.
(oh and welcome back, creation of adam shot. this time with less kneeling.)
jud also sits down to call louise, then stands up and paces when he's talking to her. (and simultaneously the sunlight drains out of the room.)
after the tone of the scene takes a sharp turn and he shifts from investigation mode back into priest mode, jud shuts the door on blanc and presumably spends a long time sitting down as he talks to louise and prays for her. here the physical position changes as his role does.
when blanc comes in, the old framing is back - blanc is standing in the doorway of the room where jud is much lower to the ground.
the rupture
the louise call gives jud clarity, and he abruptly severs himself from the investigation, in the process reading blanc for filth. ("it is a game! solving it, winning it, getting your big checkmate moment!") during the confrontation, they're visually level again, but opposite each other instead of side by side like they were in the teamwork section.
it's interesting how what jud says in the confrontation ("by using me in it, you're setting me against my real and only purpose in life") reframes his own position in those investigative teamwork scenes - superficially, it was more equal, more stable, could easily be read as character growth for jud. instead, he frames it as a loss of identity.
the relationship, in its current form, is not sustainable. jud leaves.
collision again
they first reunite for a brief moment immediately following sam's murder, while jud is lying in the dark on the forest floor, covered in mud, next to his dead body, and blanc stands over and shines a light on him. literally illuminates him at his lowest.
however, i'm sorry, gun to my head i could not find the beautiful frame everyone posts from that scene, so it's simply not going to be here.
next time they see each other is when jud dazedly stumbles into the police station to confess. that's immediately following blanc's "i sincerely with i knew [where jud is]" - a clear parallel to the way blanc shows up as an answer to jud's prayers in their first meeting.
they both start the scene out standing up, until blanc physically shepherds jud to blanc's car, shoves him in the back seat, and instructs him to get down. the dynamic is not quite back to what it was. blanc's behavior is more urgent, more physical, and so too jud's resistance becomes harder to ignore.
at nat's house they're even again. actually there are a couple shots where jud is higher, because he's following blanc down a staircase.
jud walks back up the staircase in the brief window of time when blanc is on the phone and isn't watching him, almost like at this point he only has clean autonomy when he's outside blanc's gaze.
blanc chases after him, but jud tells him not to interfere - well, not verbally, he just holds up a hand between them in a "stop" motion and looks at him meaningfully, and that does it. blanc doesn't try to stop him.
jud returns to the church to confess.
and so we come to
damascus
there are a couple more jud + blanc scenes after this section, but in my opinion this is really where everything the movie has been building with the visual levels gloriously resolves, so i'm gonna make it the grand finale of this post.
blanc starts the scene physically level with jud, the police, and the congregation. he desperately tries to argue with them from that level and get jud to sit down and listen, but when it doesn't work he runs up onto the (fuckoff tall) pulpit and starts yelling at everyone. he's very transparently emulating wicks. scrambling to restore control through any method available to him.
it works. everyone goes quiet and sits down. jud also takes his usual chair, but only after making it clear he thinks this is ridiculous.
blanc begins the grand reveal speech (mercifully, in his normal voice). when he addresses geraldine and the rest of the congregation, he's shot in low angle. but when he addresses jud directly, even though physically they haven't moved, the low angle disappears. he's not performing intellectual dominance for jud, he's genuinely engaging with him, so the camera treats them as even.
when jud asks the right questions ("the bigger why, the why that brought you here - why do all this insane, elaborate stuff? the theatricality, the impossible crime. why?"), blanc smiles and comes down from the pulpit, sacrificing a level.
however, he remains elevated over jud and the congregation, because he's standing on that platform, and everyone else is still seated. blanc keeps talking, entirely in his element.
until he looks at martha, the lesson jud's been teaching for the entire movie sinks in, the church is flooded with sunlight...
and blanc steps down and sits on the steps.
intentionally surrendering authority, pride, and control over the narrative in a way that clearly terrifies him, to extend grace to someone he despises.
...it´s a close competition with THAT^, but here is maybe my favorite thing the movie does within this framework:
blanc stands up when martha comes back into the church. martha kneels. jud comes down to take her confession. jud is kneeling. blanc is standing.
but jud is higher in frame.
the implications of that are staggering, because it basically goes against everything we've been shown so far. jud kneeling here is not a loss of agency, it's an affirmation of it. he's doing meaningful work, and in that moment he's elevated in our eyes. he doesn't need to emulate blanc to be respected. he doesn't have anything to prove anymore.
and because i can't help myself...
when blanc reveals martha is dying and geraldine and her boys run out to get medical assistance, as soon as they're out the door and it's only the three of them in the church, blanc crouches on the floor to be at eye level with jud.
he doesn't say anything. he just rests a hand on his shoulder. supportive presence without exerting control. jud gets it.
in conclusion!
this endeavor began with me just seeing a few stills of jud and blanc framed Like That and going "hang on what's going on there", then rewatching the movie with the intention to watch out for those shots and gradually realizing Just How Much Is Going On There.
i started writing this post to document the visual motif, because i was impressed by how consistent and intentional it was. and in the process of compiling, i realized there was actually Even More Going On.
because the characters are not locked into the levels. a pattern is set up, but then it's broken, jud and blanc step up, they step down, and damn near every time they do it says something either about their internal state or the way they relate to each other.
jud comes up to argue with blanc or prove he can keep up with him. jud comes down again because he's lost. blanc comes down to comfort jud (the only character he does this for, before damascus). blanc comes back up to exercise authority. etc.
it's choreography.
and, crucially, the very meaning of the unevenness expands the longer you examine it.
you sort of start out thinking
the guy who keeps kneeling on the floor - he's an emotional wreck, he's dependent on outside guidance, he's surrendering agency
the guy standing over him - he's the one providing the guidance, the one holding the agency, he sets the rules
and that's not exactly wrong. i think i've established that's a big part of it, even. it's just not the whole thing.
because you look a little closer, a little longer, and you also see
jud's willingness to humble himself, to show vulnerability and risk being seen as lesser for it, in service of genuinely connecting with people - that's his quiet strength.
and blanc's unwillingness to do the same, his insistence on staying elevated and untouchable, clutching the reins - that's his main shortcoming in the scope of this story, the one he overcomes in the emotional climax. which he only learned to do from watching jud.
and the blocking has been conveying all of that the whole time!
i love this movie so much!! thank you for reading!
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
thank you @trashworldblog for pointing out that the face blanc makes when helen gets shot and the face he makes when jud says he put his faith in him convey different degrees of the exact same anguish...... oh benoit blanc you are scared to death of letting down people who trust you aren't you🥰
"And yet, be it cruel or comforting, this machine unerringly arrives at the truth."
"But the complexity and the gray lie not in the truth, but what you do with the truth once you have it."
the way these two lines from knives out, put together, are the entire emotional and moral architecture of benoit blanc, and what all three movies are dedicated to exploring in increasing depth.
in knives out he's concerned that marta, a person he clearly holds sympathy for, might technically be at fault for the death. what do you do with that truth? but he forges ahead, hopeful that if he just does his job correctly, the rest will take care of itself. and thankfully the truth is on marta's side. still, we see inklings of a thought glass onion will put front and center: the truth is not enough for justice. they probably wouldn't have gotten ransom if marta hadn't been clever and lied about fran. blanc himself is fairly passive past the point of producing the truth. this is blanc, the machine.
glass onion really pushes that. the truth is mind-numbingly obvious, and yet it's not enough. we get to see blanc and helen agonize over this fact, and then we get to see what blanc is willing to do beyond being custodian of the truth. the decision he starts to make, before gracefully handing it off to helen. still nominally passive, but gently engineering, unable to hide behind neutrality anymore. this is blanc, the man who is left when the machine has fulfilled its only purpose, and has a judgement call to make.
how lonely it must feel, what a burden it is, to be both the machine that unerringly arrives at the truth, and the man that has to hold the truth after.
in wake up dead man, jud throws a wrench into this philosophy. after blanc already likes and trusts him and has come to rely on his cooperation, he essentially goes, firstly, "i don't need your truth. it doesn't matter as much as you assume it does." and secondly, "i don't buy the framework. i don't actually think you're the autonomous impartial machine." and for the first time blanc and we are forced to confront that maybe finding the truth isn't just the value neutral inevitable thing that happens before the moral choices have to be made. maybe it's part of the moral choice already.
the machine does get to the truth of course, that's just what it does. and right before the moment where it produces it, the man behind it forcibly stops it and takes them both off the board.