I'm sorry if this is troublesome to ask but do you still have your essay/writeup on why Milla is the more definitive protag of ToX and if so could you link it? I wanted to read it again. And if not, if you have time, maybe could you quickly summarize your reasoning? Regardless, thanks, for writing your thoughts on the subject in general, I really loved it and it helped me appreciate the game that much more.
Itâs not troublesome to ask, but I sincerely doubt I still have that meta. I purged my blog of everything prior to 2015, and I stopped my Xillia playthrough when Shiloh died, which was on January 9th, 2015. (I didnât consciously stop playing because she died, but it just . . . happened that way.) While I did still write some Tales Series meta after that, it was mostly in response to Tales Confessions, and I just did a check through my meta tag and didnât see one for Milla being the true protagonist of Xillia. As a result, Iâm going to go ahead and assume that meta is gone. That said, I donât mind quickly summarizing my reasoning since this is an opinion that I still agree with.
Essentially, the protagonist of a narrative is the character that the narrative focuses on, the character that pushes the plot forward. (In the event that there is more than one of those characters, those characters are dubbed the deuteragonist, tritagonist, and so on.) The protagonist of your story is the character that the story is about. Some people mistakenly believe that this character is always good, but this is not true; it is entirely possible to have a villain protagonist (and a heroic antagonist). Some people also think that the protagonist is the character whose eyes you see the story through, but again, this is not always true. Although John Watson narrates the Sherlock Holmes stories, he is not the protagonist---Sherlock is. Watson is an important character, sure, but these stories are not really about him, theyâre about Sherlock. Sherlock is the true protagonist.
When it comes to Tales of Xillia, an examination of the narrative reveals that it really only has one protagonist (despite how it has been incorrectly marketed), and that protagonist is Milla Maxwell. The narrative is about her, the story is about her. Her mission is what drives the plot forward, and is what gets the other characters involved. While there is a larger, over-arcing plot, ultimately the story of Tales of Xillia is about Milla, which is why the plot is still driven forward by her even after her (temporary) death. (After all, Jude decided to go after Old Man Maxwell because of Milla. It was still about her. She was still driving the plot, even when she wasnât physically there at the time.)
By contrast, Tales of Xillia is not about Jude. Jude is an important character, and he has his own character arc, but he does not drive the story forward and it is not about him. Heâs not even the deuteragonist. Rather, heâs what we call a supporting protagonist, which is a character whose eyes the narrative is seen through despite the fact that they are not the actual protagonist. To use an example listed above, John Watson is the supporting protagonist of the Sherlock Holmes stories. Ordinarily he would be a secondary character, but since he narrates the stories (that are still not really about him), heâs the supporting protagonist. The same is true in Tales of Xillia. Xillia is not about Jude, and by all rights he fills the same role that, say, Tear does in Tales of the Abyss. But when you choose to play his side, he becomes the supporting protagonist, because youâre viewing the narrative through his eyes even though the story is still not his, but Millaâs.
So yeah, despite how itâs marketed, Tales of Xillia only has one protagonist, and that protagonist is Milla Maxwell. The narrative focuses on her, she is the one who drives the plot forward. Itâs her story, and Judeâs just along for the ride, even when the story is viewed from his point of view.