Cultivating skills for resilience PART III
Some resilience skills are for keeping together what already is, while some are for moving forward to what could be. This is a third part of the blog I started a few days ago if you did not read the first go here or the second go here.
Photo by K. P. D. Madhuka on UnsplashĀ
Psychology and resilience
In psychology, resilience is about responding to a multitude of risks, not to an isolated incidence. Specific risk factors can not be looked at in isolation from other risks, and the effect of a risk factor depends on its timing and relationship to other risk factors. Resilience skills in psychology can be broadly divided into three categories.
Resilience skills at the individual level, which are also related to personality, temperament and cognitive ability,
the resilience that comes from social capital and relationships of an individual with other people;
and resilience related to broader environmental factors and institutions (safety, access to life-supporting services etc).
I learnt that while small amounts of stress are good for building resilience, ongoing stress over a long period can result in lifelong physical and psychological consequences. Stressful experiences during critical periods of brain development in infancy and young childhood are particularly detrimental. This sounds quite straightforward.
Then I delve a bit more on the current research on advance neurobiology. It is fascinating to read how environment is changing physiology of an individual even in a lifetime to respond to adversity! We can map out epigenetic changes, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, which change gene expressions; preparing the individual for future responses to environmental challenges.
How to connect the psychology of resilience back to the idea of composting?
Fear, doubt, self-hatred and resentment cause resistance for unlearning. If composting and letting go for a change is a vital resilience skill, it is a not a surprise that psychology articles that I did read during this journey, place the self-esteem and sense of control over oneās own life as central resilience characteristics. Conclusively, it does not help to make people who have suffered trauma feel that they are victims of the circumstances, at least not at the personal level.
As a matter of fact, the people that have felt, or are in it just now (be it a climate-related disaster, pandemic or a political conflict), are the real experts of resilience. People who are already profoundly merged in the decay of the modernity, and absurdity of the current development paradigm, are finding alternative ways to nurture life. Remarkably, even in terrible circumstances, people show resilience, a ālust for lifeā. What this could this mean in practice?
In this podcast episode, Vanessa Andreotti narrates her work with the indigenous communities in Latin America. She used the deep adaptation group practises on āa social collapseā derived from Jem Bendellās work on deep adaptation. The response of the indigenous community that Vanessa is working with was telling. - What? Are you asking us to imagine what would happen when the so-called āessentialā services collapse - if a gasoline station runs out gasoline, or if there is no electricity in the grid, or shelves at the food stores are empty? Some felt offended that this was a picture of a collapse of civilization. - Ā But it is our life now. And we are coping with it, we have to, and we ARE finding ways to live. Ā
I find this insight fascinating. These communities who are in the midst of it all are the best experts to teach resilience skills. It might be helpful if we (who are not so adversely affected by the multiple crises of our globalized world) would pay more attention to what is emerging in these communities. The following anecdote, which I also heard from Vanessa, helps understand this wisdom. āThe water needs to be at least knee hight before we can learn to swim; it is no point of practising at the water that is only reaching up to your ankles.
Are you looking at out of the box or inside the box?
From the perspective of a global society these lessons from psychology might be counterintuitive, would we not need to pay attention to vulnerability, to map out and recognize the systemic inequality and suffering that our Western hegemony and destructive economic system is imposing to those exploited?
Yes, collectively, we need to address the historical burden of inequality. Still, answers how to approach that question might be very different from the ways that we think problems are fixed.Ā
Indigenous communities involved in the work of Vanessaās collective gesturing towards decolonial futures are clear that if relationships are not healed, are not grounded, we will end up more killing and destruction. In contrast to regenerative transformation for the whole of humanity, people will turn inwards, to fight to protect their families and loved ones from the increasing violence. That insight feels right to me.
And indeed, more and more thinkers, artists and activists are paying attention to relationships and what happens in āa liminal spaceā in between. One of the leaders of this thought is a systems thinker, writer and educator Nora Bateson. What I particularly like in her theory is that instead of searching for something outside the current system āto replace the systemā we ought to look inside the system. How we, as warm bodies and intelligent organisms, are in our relationships with other parts of the system. Her concept of warm data is not a map of connections that can be drawn on a piece of paper because it is only perceived when being part of a system and participating in it.
While what is emerging from that thought feels quite blurry at the moment, Iām very excited to participate in a warm data lab process myself. I hope to pen down some reflections from experience in my next blog. Stay tuned.Ā