AESTHETIC QUALITY: 22/30
âyour performance was a decent crowd-pleaser. adequate, not spectacular--i think the crowd was quite excited by what you did, though i must say it didnât necessarily grab my attention. i found your double barrier-shattering somewhat repetitive, and i also think you could have done more to fill the time that you had during the song--especially in the way of more move combinations. i could see a lot of good ideas in your appeal, and i think you could have dared to dream bigger.â
ADHERENCE TO THEME: 26/30
âi could clearly see the struggle to establish and maintain a bond throughout the piece and throughout its lyrics, which is a part of greatness--one cannot be great without relying on others. i think you could have adhered to the theme even better if you as trainers had shown more action throughout the piece.â
ORIGINALITY: 23/30
âyou have done a fairly good job with symbolically depicting the meaning of the lyrics, displaying an understanding of their meaning that goes beyond a surface-level reading of the text. at the same time, however, i also felt as though you played it safe with many of the symbols that you used in your appeal. once again, i would encourage you both to dare to dream a little bigger.â
BONUSES AND ANTI-BONUSES:
âyou receive +10 for using a move other than the designated moves to manipulate the water. this brings us to a total of 81 collective points!â
INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION: 28/30
âyour performance was the equal of your partnerâs; i would not have expected less from two such experienced performers. next time, however, i would urge you to balance your pokĂ©monsâ performances with each other. your altaria took more of the spotlight in comparison with your other pokĂ©mon, and while it wasnât that much of a difference, it was still noticeable.â
TECHNICAL MASTERY: 22/30
âyour pokĂ©mon gave an adequate performance technically, but i didnât really see anything that stood out. most of the move combinations were straightforward and simply stated, and in future performances i would like to see more complexity. i have faith in you--as an experienced coordinator, that shouldnât be hard.â
TEAM EFFORT: 30/30
BONUSES AND ANTI-BONUSES
âyou receive +10 for using more than one pokĂ©mon individually. this means you have a total of 90 individual points!â
INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION: 27/30
âlike your partner, you shared the stage and contributed in your own brilliant way--i could clearly see the two of you working together, and that is to be applauded. however, also like your partner, i noticed that some of your pokĂ©mon contributed more than others--in particular, your comfey was there only to use one move, and then it was done. like your partner, i would encourage you to keep the roles more balanced, or find some way in-performance to justify why some of your pokĂ©mon have lesser roles than others.â
TECHNICAL MASTERY: 23/30
âi really enjoyed the sight of your eevee using swift to fill the teacup with water--that was fairly impressive. seeing that made me wish that you had done more with your other pokĂ©monsâ skills as well. next time i would urge you to push your pokĂ©mon to do more, reach higher. i know you have it in you.â
TEAM EFFORT: 30/30
BONUSES AND ANTI-BONUSES
âyou receive +10 for using more than one pokĂ©mon individually. you have a total of 90 individual points!â
âThis means that Margaret and Yukihiro, you each have a total score of 171 POINTS!â
@a-hell-of-a-lot-of-muses @cafeshiawaseÂ













