#vapidness

Why do MTF tranny's and effeminate gay men portray feminine behavior as vapid with retarded valley egirl speak?

Let's break it down on this week's episode.

If you look at men presenting as feminine, they all do the same fucking thing: They sound like a retarded valley egirl while expressing performative vapid behavior. Such behavior, for example, includes constantly toying or flipping their hair, overly exaggerated head tilts and broad, sweeping movements as hand gestures, and ending every sentence including statements in a questioning tone. They present female behavior as little girlish behaviors.

Interestingly, however, the majority of crossdressers do not exhibit this behavior. I say the majority, because there are some who do fall back into the vapidness because that's what they think women are like due to a lack of exposure to real women. In my own personal research into the crossdresser community, women wind up being the over-performers by expressing masculinity-overload (AKA Butch). This too is due to a lack of exposure to real men. Yet, traditionally back into the 1920s, crossdressing lesbians (wearing tuxes, or men's clothing) got it right.

First and foremost, this is not critical of crossdressers. To their credit, it's their expression because it truly is a separate but fully integrated personae into their lives. Some men I interviewed over the past few decades for some of my stories were very open about how natural it was for them to assume and express their femininity. They were essentially free to be more themselves. Whether or not they were passable aside, their behavior did not change into the caricature of a woman, but instead, carried about with true-to-form feminine movements, intonation, and mindset. It was rather interesting.

For women, I found many to misunderstand men. In interviews, many indicated the strength and the authority being the dominant factors to portray in their masculine behaviors -- mostly a softened caricature of men. They overdid the gruff with expressive masculine posturing and the like. Yet a minority legitimately reflected the same as their male crossdressing counterparts whereby it simply was a natural shift in movements, intonation, mindset, with their own persona remaining stable across both.

The general summary here is: Humans need to accept everyone's freedom to just be themselves without the judgement from others without enforcement.

Second, the drag queens are what people see the most. They're outlandish on purpose. They are portraying caricatures of feminine behavior. This began as part of the anti-feminist movement to portray the outlandish and over-the-top behaviors of women to an audience of men for humor. The sexual aspect, much like with crossdressers, isn't really part of the show. That only became more prominent in expressly gay communities.

I do want to point out that even with crossdressers, sex as their alternate personae is very connected to their biological sex. Most crossdressers, men and women, are quite heterosexual whether wearing the opposite gender's clothing or not -- keeping in line with the statistics of homo-to-hetero sexuality. Meaning that, if they weren't crossdressers, they would still be in the same statistics of groupings for homosexual, heterosexual, and bisexual inclinations. The numbers did not skew.

In those whom I interviewed who were bisexual or gay, they were that long before crossdressing. Those who were crossdressers before becoming sexually active were more frequently straight. Those who were homosexual were oftentimes crossdressers after becoming sexually active. More interestingly, the bulk majority were bisexual in a broad spectrum: Some even expressing this only with a member of the opposite sex. Furthermore, I found that bisexuals tended to have sexual relationships with either sex whether crossdressing or not.

How did I investigate this? Being who I am, I shapeshift, I'm omnisexual (because aliens [more exactly, I'm sapiosexual]), and so therefore it's easier for me to understand crossdressers. While I did not shapeshift into a male form...

... I did and occasionally still do [fashionably] wear men's clothing. Any woman will tell you that men's clothing is more comfortable and has pockets. Accessorizing men's clothing is relatively simple in comparison to women's clothing. A T-shirt and jeans is sufficient. There are some mechanical issues here and there, but that's unimportant. Historically, it was easier prior to the 1900s. Women's fashion on the other hand, has always been a pain in the ass in some way or another.

For a women to wear women's clothing, accessorizing is necessary to not look like a bath towel. Even with a plain dress, you need some kind of belt-like accessory or chain to add a sense of style. You then may need to add a loose, non-functional, sweater-vest that barely holds together and you wouldn't dare to button it if too tight. Perhaps if not that, a loose scarf. You need something to carry your shit in, so now you add a purse that is either worn by strap or carried in hand. Now you add a sunhat, shoes, nylons, sunglasses, a necklace, and earrings to complete the ensemble.

Men: Pants, maybe socks, maybe boxers, maybe a shirt, and maybe shoes. And they still have fucking pockets.

This doesn't even begin to cover makeup, hair management, and any additional bits of flare one wishes to add -- and mind you, you're probably not interested in attracting attention of someone, but you don't want other women to look at you and think, "I wonder whose bed this slut just rolled out of?"

The reason why I'm going into this, is because it's a lot of effort for male crossdressers and not as much effort for female crossdressers. Why even sacrifice pockets?! Yet today, crossdressers are synonymous with transexuals, and that's unfair to them. They're often not.

More importantly, they don't do so to diminish femininity but rather feel more comfortable in their persona despite neither being gay nor bisexual. Furthermore, they tend to naturally exhibit actual feminine behaviors, demeanors, and mannerisms but usually only when cross-dressed and very subtly does such a shift occur. The most passable bisexual crossdressers were more-times-than-not, the most true-to-form feminine or masculine, depending on the shift.

This is largely due to the broader acceptance these days, though there is a concerning shift toward younger-appearances for sexual gratification. This is inherent in Humans because older men like younger women because of biological imperatives to procreate. Interestingly further, actual bisexual male crossdressers tend to present their bisexuality in their alternate persona more publicly, but aren't dependent on it.

It's only the transexual community that overdoes it. They exhibit the caricature of femininity. It's like they never met a real woman, ever. Mulvaney, for instance, is a prime example. The Bud Light Audrey Hepburn cartoonish behavior was rather insulting to me. I've seen this one that was very passably female, but the way they spoke was enough to make my brain pop an artery just to make it stop. Every sentence sounded like a 12 year old girl talking about makeup and appearance, and hair flips, and jarring posture shifts, poses, and gesturing. Oh god, the frequent gesturing and hair flips alone made me want to slap this bitch and say, "GET CHECKED FOR PARKINSON'S!" Every... fucking... sentence... ended upward. It was painful to hear an overly forced melodic voice talking about the most inane things.

The reason for this is the desire of attention. The caricature does that for the wrong reasons: Sexually attracting people for self-gratification and mental reinforcement of a forced persona. And it is a forced persona which is why it's a caricature. The expectation that this is what attracts the opposite sex for pleasure and love is really a core mental illness within the Human species itself and is not endemic to drag queens or transexuals. The problem that is specific per say toward transexuals is the lack of understanding and externalized reinforcement rather than treatment for mental issues and illnesses.

In the perspective that a driving factor for "feeling like being in the wrong body" is oftentimes a lack of confidence, self-love, and depression. The grass being greener on the other side of the fence rather than fixing up one's own lawn. Not being a mental health professional, I'm certain other factors play a part, but the realization detransitioners experience is exactly this.

Someone once said to me something rather profoundly interesting. They experienced buyer's remorse. It was from a former crossdresser who is also no longer bisexual, and is now fully heterosexual with a family. The bisexuality began prior to crossdressing. Heterosexual activity began after turning 18, but had been bisexually inclined though closeted throughout high school. With equally hetero-to-homosexual trysts, crossdressing was a small part of that behavior -- but interestingly only in certain circumstances for the benefit of self or partner. That indicated the relationship between the sexual activity and the crossdressing were not interdependent. The buyer's remorse was experienced after crossdressing-related sexual activity. As he put it, it made him fell cheap, used, and was not satisfying.

Sound familiar girls?

Today, this individual leads a normal life but I could still detect the mannerisms of both masculine and feminine behaviors. Neither over-the-top, and both intertwined into a singular stable individual. I would put this as normalization, because it reflected similarly with both women and men who went the opposite direction into homosexual relationships. In those who maintained their crossdressing, they too were very stable in their relationships. Some remained bisexual in open or shared relationships.

Yet to realistically comprehend why the over-the-top vapid egirl behavior is synonymous with feminine behavior in the transexual community is because of the hypersexualization of women, specifically, young girls.

This is the underlying problem in the LGBTQ+ community, and it's being normalized. The intrinsic desire of youthful sexual behavior is why the majority of transexual males take on the persona of vapidness. It's very apparent that they believe this to be the basis of femininity and the way to attract sexual attention toward a relationship to fill the void of attention, love, and whatever self-gratification they require. It's also the same fundamental factors involved in egirls seeking money, fame, and what's worse: It works.

Men typically gravitate toward this as a visual stimuli that drives the biological impetus of procreation. The lack of emotional regulation being taught to men and women is the problem. The feminine drive of the same factor is also falling into this trap, because they see men plying money and attention toward this behavior. The cycle completes in a revolving door of emptiness. Mental health issues, underlying or otherwise upon the surface, become worsened.

I do blame the LGBTQ+ community for their continuous assault on women and men. The disassociation of biological sex with the fantasy notion of gender rather than the comprehension of sexuality is precisely why abhorrent aberrant behaviors become normalized. The core attraction toward youth is ever present, and the adoption of that youthfulness to garner sexual attraction for self-fulfillment is only making things worse.

Increasingly, female and male liberalized educators are being caught for sexual activity with students. Not simply the typical teacher-student-affection generated relationships, but the overly sympathetic empathy applied to students increases the likelihood of pedophilic activity. They don't see it as that and juxtapose an adult relationship where none should be. True, that the real sickos are still ever present, but the normalization of youthful attraction is increasing the number of adults seeking and entering into these irresponsible reprehensible relationships.

Further impacting this is that acceptance that children can determine and are encouraged to explore their sexuality at very young ages, being capable of determining major medical mutilations of their bodies to support such. And yet the punishment of pedophilic behavior due to children being under 18 years old, children are unable to vote, and can't purchase cigarettes, guns, or vapes; Restrictions for being under an age is due to a society that proclaims are required because of their still developing brains being incapable of understanding long-term consequences. It is such a fucking paradox that it confuses the line between why we have an 18-and-older policy for children versus the political impetus to normalize aberrant behavior!

Think of this question for a moment: Why?

Yes, the image is intentional to further that why. Physical beauty and the intrinsic desire for the feminine portrait. Languid, not a care in the world, present, available, youthful, sexually desirable, and submissive: A fuckable pet. Why else do you think I post selfies so extremely rarely? I'd rather people enjoy me for me and not my beauty (I'm not modest in the least).

IT'S 2026, AND YET MEDIA AND PEOPLE CONTINUE TO PUSH VICTORIANISM UPON WOMEN!

Do I lounge about like this at random places? No. I can't afford to because someone will walk up and drop a pickup line. Do I flip my hair and talk like a valley girl? NO! I'm not retarded. When I do that voice, those things; it's out of mockery.

When viewing this vapid behavior in the proper lens, we can understand the why. The why is not resultant of mental illness. It's not because they're transgender. It's not because they're crossdressers. It's not because they're drag queens. It's also not because of their sexual proclivity!

It's because of the complete and utter attack on what male and female biology is all about. It's an attack on feminism. It's an attack on masculinity. It's an attack on intellectualism. It's an attack on common motherfucking decency.

Paradoxically approving of people's sexual behaviors while manifesting a caricature of femineity and masculinity in pursuit of equally assailing the qualities that define these traits without addressing the elephants in the room, is precisely why pedophilic attraction is manifesting even more these days than people realize. Just look at egirls! These bitches are in their 20s and 30s, going into their 40s soon, and they intentionally look like, talk like, and act like teenage girls! Then, you look at the transgenders, and what do you see?

Is this a rant? Yes. Absolutely.

Is this reality? Completely.

Are all transgenders, gays, lesbians, crossdressers and drag queens in this box? No.

Is there a mental health issue here? Abso-fucking-lutely.

We're not treating the underlying issue: Hypersexualization.

Politics on the left pushes hyper-emotionalism as a form of drumming up support. If people were in control of their emotions and thought critically; liberalism falls apart. However, by allowing if promoting basal instinctual animalism allows for low-brow intellectualism to manifest, they would rather that than the former. Distracting people with allocations in support of basal animalism presents a preoccupation with self-and-instant-gratification. If you're supported for that, then there's an easier path to manifest your emotionalism rather than your brain.

As indicated, the factor of "buyer's remorse" experienced by some was the rationalization that they were filling a void with the wrong things. Once they had the right things, they improved. As transgenders are now aging past their teens, they too are beginning to experience this because of the same exact issue. Biblically, there's sections that cover this very profoundly as why it's important to fill yourself with self-love first. That you should love the body you're in.

People mutilating their bodies to a mental image externally fed to them as being an answer is not the right way to address why they think that behaving like a child to attract love, attention, affection, requires being sexually attractive in kind, leading to further declination of the Human condition. It reinforces the instincts, emotionalism, and mental health issues that are everywhere today. It's precisely why, again, this visage of youth is sexually appealing by making it more accessible.

I'll close this with this notion: Ladies, how would you react when you see a 20-year old woman dressed like a child with an older man in public?

In short, this isn't an anti-anything post other than to draw attention to my perspective that the underlying problem is still the visceral hypersexualiized attraction to youth and the inherent promotion of animalism instead of true intellectualism. It's completely fine to be feminine, masculine, in-between, and not make it an identity. Identity is who you are, not what you are. You don't need to impress upon others to call you something and they do not need to be concerned with that either. You don't need to be in any categories or labelled. However, the continued assault on what femininity versus masculinity is will only result in furtherment of abnormal behavior.

Treat the root cause of the problem, not the symptoms. Enough with the hypersexualization. It's fine to admire and enjoy sexuality, but when that becomes an identity or a fixation -- that's where problems arise. All life is more than just their gonads or their mental construct of self. I don't care if you're a woman who thinks they're a masculine gay helicopter that's also a werewolf. That has nothing to do with me ordering a coffee from you. What I do care about is when this notion that celebrating being something you're not requires me to adhere to some stupid ass unspoken thoughtpolice laws or else, and when your presentation is a caricature of who I am.

Yes, I am feminine in real life -- and yes, again, I am a female of my species. I still talk like I write on Tumblr. I'm still a bisexual alien shapeshifting princess from another planet. I don't care what you call me, even if it's derogatory because you don't agree with me.

I don't care.