Besides personal preference of show, is there much difference between stage managing a Shakespeare show versus a contemporary play? (all my stage management experience is with Shakespeare and most of it being outdoor Shakespeare).
I feel like we do less table work, like we might only do 2 maybe 3 days before weâre up on our feet. So getting everything geared towards that earlier is a thing.
and the other thing is contemporary shows are so specific in their setting whereas we get to fuck around with it in Shakespeare. In some ways it feels more constrictive. iâm not sure how to translate that feeling into what that means for stage management, but itâs in the room.
The other thing is...I feel like the Shakespeare actors are better trained in the business of being an actor? Like they know to not cut their hair without consultation, take fight choreography much more seriously, try to get off book faster...stuff like that? Thatâs just my experience though. I can totally see it being the exact opposite, since Shakespeare can be done by anyone.
Feelings aside, thereâs not much different in the mechanics between Shakespeare and contemporary in terms of what my paperwork is or how I would call the show. I would say thereâs more of a difference between spoken theatre versus non-verbal or sung theatre.
Am I making any sense at all?











