May 20
Loading...
seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from China
seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from Russia
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I've used numerous citation styles over the years but if I have my choice I will always use IEEE (which is great because I'm an engineer). It's neat, efficient, and, let's face it, the author's name and a year doesn't give you any more information than the bracketed number anyways.
I mean, I can at least see the appeal of a simple numerical system that doesn't clutter the main text (since bracketed numbers function essentially the same as superscript footnotes, at least until you get a lot of them; it is easier to combine sources in footnote refs) and can be referenced in order. For example, I think Wikipedia is referenced in IEEE, and it is a fairly intuitive system once you get used to it. I still maintain that for print projects such as books and journals, footnotes are superior, but for digital/online resources where footnotes are impractical, IEEE is a useful way of doing it.
Uboat53 is up to his usual smug leftist deluded tricks.
Don't take my word for it, you just have to listen to all of the influential people in the MAGA movement, up to and including the Vice-President, argue that empathy is not just unnecessary, but actively sinful.]
If you look in the first link, it talks about how empathy can be toxic and used to enable bad things, including lies.
I'd also like to point out that the Elon Musk quote has no checkable source more precise than "he was on Joe Rogan". Not even an episode number, so we can find the context.
(He's been on the show 8 times. The empathy bit seems to be from Episode #2281, released on 28 February 2025, and he said (1:16:00) society should care more about long-term civilizational benefits.
Like "not collapsing society".)
The JD Vance mention isn't even a quote. It's a paraphrase. The horrible thing he said was that we should take care of our families first.
(Which makes it seem like Uboat thinks neglecting or harming your family is morally justifiable in the name of the Greater Good.)
And the second article is literally the same AP article as the first.
Either Uboat didn't notice, or he put two links to the same story in to look like he had more evidence.