Yay!! You opened requests, I love your writing and was wondering if you could write a Kirk x reader where the reader new on the enterprise and she enters with AC/DC playing in the background and speaks to Kirk with a full on sailor's mouth? Thanks again
AN: I kinda switched your request around a little. I thought it worked better this way
Warnings: Language obviously. POTTY MOUTH READER
Words: 533
Kirk walked down the empty hallways of the Enterprise slowly, savoring an occasional sip from the steamy mug he carried. And as much as he hated to admit it, he was savoring the silence of the ship. No engines hummed, no idle chatter, no beeps or ringing of any kind.
The Enterprise was docked for a refit and everyone but a tiny skeleton crew was off the ship, enjoying a rare visit back on Earth. They would start coming back sometime tomorrow. But for now, the ship was empty and so quiet that Jim could even hear the faint hum of the life support system.
He took another sip and rounded a corner before pausing. Something new was penetrating the silence. The repetitive dull thud ofâŚ
A bass guitar? Jim thought to himself. He began walking in the direction of the beat. It grew louder and louder until he found himself in front of one of the biolabs. He waved a hand over the sensor panel and the door slid open. Kirk almost winced as the muffled sound exploded into guitar riffs, screaming vocals, and that bass guitar.
Across the lab, he watched a figure in casual clothing bob to the beat as they unpacked a large metal crate. He grinned when he realized the figure was singing as well.
âComputer, silence music.â He commanded from the doorway. At the sound of his voice and the sudden loss of music, you whipped your head to stare at the figure in the doorway. A blonde man dressed in civilian clothes as well.
âEx-fuckin-scuse me? I was listening to that!â You growled.
âIâm sorry. I just heard AC/DC and figured I had to meet whoever had this impeccable music taste.â He smiled. You paused and rose an eyebrow.
âYou know your classical music?â You asked, setting down your box. Kirk nodded and you continued, âA darker time for the planet for sure, but damn did they do music well.â
âSo whoâŚwho are you?â Kirk asked.
âY/N Y/L/N. Recent Starfleet graduate and the best fucking botanist this side of the galaxy.â You folded your arms in dramatic, smug fashion.
âA botanist with the mouth of a space boomer?â He cocked an eyebrow. You rolled your eyes.
âOh please. I have less than 24 hours to get it out of my system. Iâll talk however the fuck I want to. What are you going to do? Report me to the captain?â You smiled at the man. He smiled back, refraining from bursting into laughter.
âNo no. I like it. Itâs nice to get some candor once in a while. Itâs refreshing, just unexpected.â He shook his head, grinning.
âWell Mister. If weâre serving together, I think youâll find Im very unexpected.â You winked at him.
âI look forward to getting to know you then.â He lowered his voice, almost seductively. He was about to say something else when someone in the corridor walked by and stopped.
âAh! Captain! There you are. Youâre needed on the Bridge.â They exclaimed before continuing on their way. Your mouth dropped in horror.
âYouâreâŚYouâre Captain Kirk?â You stuttered as Jim began to leave the room.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Idea: a trigger system and a tripartite system. In transitive sentences there is one trigger for patient and agent, so: "hug-trig I-dir you-pat" OR "hug-trig I-ag you-dir" BUT intransitive sentences use only agent and patient case which are "presumed" to be the direct case and show volition. A single verb has different meanings depending on transitivity so transitively "hug-trig I-dir" is I hug BUT in "hug-trig dir-I" (I am hugged), the direct case is prefix. What are your thoughts? Possible?
Anything is possible. You just did it right there: Itâs possible. Is it natural? Probably not. That only matters if youâre creating a naturalistic language. I personally donât find it particularly interesting, because (a) trigger systems donât exist, and (b) the conlanging community went through a trigger language phase way back when. Thatâs just me, though.
It really is important, though, in creating a language to distinguish between whatâs natural and whatâs possible, because let me tell you, one of those is a subset of the other.
Think of it this way. How many 1-20 character strings can you type on a qwerty keyboard? Some gigantic number. How many of those are licit English words? Some very large but still necessarily smaller number. So if you look at the following:
-3icnpioelwi
8838383dk
plates
89-c24493cniad
pc283
All of those fall under the category â1-20 character strings you can type on a qwerty keyboardâ. Only one of them falls under the category of âEnglish wordsâ.
Your ask basically sounds like, âCan I type 83hf38 on a qwerty keyboard?â I mean, the answer is obviously yes. Were the ask, âIs 83hf38 a plausible English word?â the answer is obviously no. It feels like, though, you asked the first question, but meant the secondâyet if the answer were no, you wouldâve understood that to mean ânot possible everâ.
So just to be really, really clear: In a constructed language, what is natural is different from what is possible. Everything that is natural is possible; NOT everything thatâs possible is natural.
Furthermore, naturalistic conlangs are one type of conlang. They are not the best type of conlang, anymore than, say, naturalist painting is the best type of art. There is no best type of conlang. Itâs just a matter of what the conlanger wants to do, and how well they do what theyâre trying to do.
Also, this response here isnât just in response to your ask. I get these types of questions a lot, where I feel like an answer of âyesâ is bad and an answer of ânoâ is bad, and itâs because of how the question was asked, and because of the assumptions that underlie the question. I really do not want to give the impression that naturalistic conlangs are the best type of conlang. There are lots of other types of conlangs that can be made, and you can tackle a lot more interesting things if youâre not boxed in by naturalism. A naturalistic conlang is never going to push the boundaries of what humans could potentially do with language, simply because natural languages never do. Theyâre far, far too limited for the potential our brains possess.
Whoever you are, telling people that "time heals all wounds" stop it! It's not condusive to any situation and is a candy Coated ass way of telling someone to get over it.