Watching Encanto has given me a deeper perspective on Thorâs character arc in Endgame and I have to thank Isabela for that lmao! Because I think the two have a lot in common!
We all know Thorâs depression came from trauma and watching his whole family die, but itâs not just that that traumatized Thor. His response to the trauma is the response that happens when the golden child in the family becomes a disappointment or no longer lives to familyâs expectations.
We joke about how Odin favors Thor and treats Loki like garbage, but itâs true. Thor was the golden child. For those who arenât familiar with the term, itâs often used in narcissistic parenting to describe the child in the family that is perfect and loved regardless any flaws they may have. To put it simply, theyâre the perfect sibling. Every dysfunctional/abusive family has one. They get better treatment and kinder punishments.
Like Isabela, Odinâs form of control is holding the golden child up to a higher standard for the less favored child to look up to and both Thor and Isabela share the burden of being perfect for the patriarch (or in Isabelaâs case, matriarch) of the family.Thorâs always been the main character. The one destined to be king and built to bear all responsibilities the Allfather has.
But what happens when the golden child fails?
Their entire character and accomplishments are an extension of their (and their abusive parentâs) identity. Once they step out of line, all of that comes crumbling down with them. It doesnât matter how many lives they saved or awards they received, if they prove theyâre not as infallible as everyone believes them to be, their strength fades. Which is what happens to Thor.
His entire identity is gone. His identity as a king, a brother, an Avenger. None of that matters after Infinity War because Thor believes heâs not worthy.
Worthiness for mjolnir isnât what really matters. I think mjolnir is a metaphor for something bigger that Thor himself might be too afraid to admit. I think when Thor says âIâm still worthy!â Heâs not just happy about being worthy to wield mjolnir, heâs happy to learn that his worthiness was never attached to his identity as a golden child. That he can rebuild himself as a person and become a new brand of perfect in his eyes. Not someone who is indestructible but someone that is confident in themselves and feels genuine love from the ones around him. Someone allowed to mess up and try again (if they want to). Â
Thorâs transformation in Endgame is somewhat similar to Isabelaâs (but not as dramatic). Thereâs a blend of old Thor and new Thor. There are qualities of him that made him âperfectâ mixed in with new things that wouldnât necessarily be seen as perfect. His messy hair, his beard, storm breaker, but his old battle armor is still the same and he incorporated Asgardian braids into his style.Â
I am excited to see Love and Thunder because I hope Thor completes his transformation and finds his identity as Thor and not as Thor: Odinâs Golden Child.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Thor is a brother. A prince. King. Lover. Fighter. Avenger. His identity is wrapped so tightly around these fragments that if he lets go, heâll fall to pieces. But heâs fragmented because he shattered. And he shattered because of what happened in Thor: God of Thunder.Â
Thorâs arc in the first movie, I believe, centers around the idea of consequences. Itâs not falling in love with Jane, itâs not Asgard, not someone slapping him over the head. Itâs the fact that his choices suddenly have weight and meaning.Â
Thor gets banished for slaughtering Jotun unprovoked.Â
Thorâs relationship with Jane, Darcy, and Erik is poor because heâs treating them like crap.Â
Thor fails to capture his hammer because heâs not worthy. (To whatever standard Odin has set.)Â
Thor, as heâs told, is the catalyst of his fatherâs death.Â
Thereâs this moment in this scene when you can watch his face go from earnest to oh. That was me. I did that. Me. Not you. ME.
Thor is the prince of Asgard, which is basically an empire of nine worlds. He is used to having diplomatic immunity. He could do no wrong. With that ripped out away from him, Thor doesnât talk. He shuts down, and settles inside himself, thinking.Â
Not reacting. Thinking.Â
Thor isnât an idiot. Heâs impulsive, thereâs a difference. His first reaction is violence, because he was raised in a society where slapping your enemies over the head brutally was just something that was done. As much as I love Frigga, when Thor was banished, in the deleted scene, she didnât go to Odin so tell him oh my gosh, our son killed all these Jotuns, why didnât we teach him better? She complains that Odinâs punishment was too harsh.Â
Thor has never been told to stretch this much, and had it stick before. And Loki does it. He does it in a way thatâs a little cruel, and cold, but he tells Thor to stop being such an idiot.Â
And Thor, miracle of miracles, actually listens.Â
This is not a story of Thor becoming worthy. This is the story of Thor realizing where his priorities need to be. Itâs the story of him growing up.Â
And this is where we get to my final point. I think that almost none of this--none of it--would have sunk deeply into Thorâs psyche if Loki didnât fall of the Bifrost when they fought.Â
Look at them. Loki is dangling. Thor is being held onto by his foot.Â
And Thor doesnât care.Â
Because the only thing heâs focused on is his little brother. Hanging there. Dying. His best friend that just tried to kill all the Jotuns. His confidante that just disowned him. His biggest supporter that fought him. And Thor doesnât understand. He doesnât understand. He doesnât know what Loki uncovered at that point.
This is just his brother who is going to die if he doesnât do anything.Â
And then Loki addresses his last words to their father. Not him. Their father. And Odin rejects him. It always struck me that Thor sees Lokiâs face close off and then immediately knows what Loki is going to do. Heâs not surprised, heâs not shocked. He knows. Loki lets go, and Thor canât catch him.
Thor can fly. Odin didnât let him go until Loki was beyond any chance of recovery, and Thor blamed himself. Heâs solemn after Lokiâs death. He rejects his parentsâ and friendsâ comfort. He goes to Heimdall to start looking out for Jane, because he is not going to let someone else he cares about slip beyond his reach.Â
Thorâs consequence for his actions in Thor 1 was his brother. And that nearly killed him. Thor 1 was never, never about becoming worthy. At least, not for Thor.
I was having a conversation with someone who said Loki was a forgettable villain in Thor 1 and that people only started liking him after the first Avengers once he was more powerful and I had an automatic vitriol reaction.Â
But I got to thinking why do people like Loki so much? Why does he provoke such powerful feelings among fans? Why is this particular villain so easy to empathize with despite all heâs done? And I think it has to do with the nature of hero movies and how theyâre structured, especially with the way Thor 1 is set up.
Thor is the crowned prince of Asgard, a land we learn right from the beginning is born of conquest â Laughfy calls Odin a âliar and a thief.â The first scene weâre given of Thor and Loki is a remuneration on how low the Frost Giants are and how their conquest was not only needed for the safety of the realms but also inherently virtuous. Thor himself, as a child, is seen reflecting this violent thinking, vowing to end an already defeated race of people whose planetâs life force was taken from them.
When the Frost Giants enter Asgard they only seek to take back what is theirâs, they do not take anything else from the vault. While Thor enters Jotunheim ready to kill over a comment that questioned his masculinity, ârun back home little princess.â
Thor is our hero here and because Thor is presented as our hero we are being told we must not only acknowledge the supremacy of those born privileged and violent, we must love them. When we see the home of the Frost Giants again we see it is a dying and crumbling planet. Weâre told to look down on the hopeless scampering of the weak Frost Giants as they dodge the jaws of their overlords.Â
Everything about Thor 1 seems to follow the Law of the Schoolyard: only the strong and the beautiful triumph, and the powerless survive only by serving the strong.
What follows in the film is a sequence of events that we all recognize: a trial of masculine initiation in which Thor exerts physical strength and will to overcome opposing forces, earning his right to enter a privileged sphere of male power and succeed the throne. The Queen, witnessing the devastation around her, is strangely passive throughout the film â Odin is weakened and too old to continue ruling the kingdom and it seems Frigga is incapable of taking up the mantle despite her experience and power. She never does anything to oppose Odin, sheâs infantilized.Â
Thor, on the other hand, is the first born son and will be given the throne for that reason alone no matter how unqualified or dangerous he is to Asgard.Â
We can see through all this that the structure of Asgard is objectively appalling. Itâs unfair â a patriarchal monarchy â itâs not the sort of world we can get behind.
The story of the Frost Giantâs is very important to the film because we find out our villain Loki is one of these Frost Giants. Loki learns he is part of a despised race; a race his brother wants to destroy, a race his father has subjugated for at least a thousand years.Â
The only solution after absorbing this information is to feel empathy for Loki. People donât empathize with Loki because they secretly like people who want to be dictators and go on to kill entire cities of people, they empathize and identify with the version of Loki they see, who is someone who is rightfully angry with the way things are. Itâs almost like the film is wrong about who Loki really is.Â
Even in the Avengers, where he is a more defined villain who does villainous things, audiences that have already empathized with him go âwell he wouldnât actually be like that, nobodies really like that.â Thereâs this powerful rejection to the narrative the film is feeding you because youâre repulsed by the world he comes from and the way itâs treated him. âThey just donât understand this character like I do.âÂ
People like villains because they see them as responding in a way thatâs appropriate to the nightmare world they live in. Anyone who finds the world a film exists in to be icky in any way canât help but identify with the villain who moves against it.
Thatâs why Black Panther is so brilliant because it acknowledges the parts of Wakanda that are wrong and backward and uses that to build a better plot and recognize how Killmonger has been failed.Â
These villains are rebelling against an unfair world that has never taken them into account and are punished for it. While their actions are questionable and objectively immoral it almost doesnât matter what they did, their symbolism gets more focus from the audience. They stand in for âthe otherâ (an individual who is perceived by the group as not belonging, as being different in some fundamental way) almost by virtue of being a villain and standing opposite of what the hero stands for. Villains upset the status quo of their deeply flawed societies.
We see this in a lot of Disney villains. Characters like, Ursula, Scar, and Hades are stand-ins for the fear of the fall of traditional values, they exert a corrupting influence on the young who need to fall in line and continue to perpetuate the ideal homogeneous nuclear society of feminine domesticity and male lead culture. A culture that excludes and leaves little room for âthe other.â Itâs no coincidence that villains are so often queer coded (including Loki). Queerness upsets the status quo and thus is seen as a threat.
This is also the problem with Marvel villains; the writers are unwilling to accept the unfairness of their worlds which create crime and anger and a privileged ruling class the rest must yield to. Their villains canât be memorable if they canât be sympathetic and they canât be sympathetic if the writer wonât acknowledge the ugly parts of their world that create villains while heroâs, in all their privilege, thrive.
The only good MCU villains are the ones who actually explore this: Killmonger, Loki, and maybe the Vulture from Homecoming, who fell into crime after Tony Starkâs company eliminated his job and stole his livelihood.
Loki is great. Villains are great. They allow us to get a peak of a world where the scorned could gain the power to utterly destroy a society that has belittled and slighted them, getting a chance to release all their anger in the most destructive and vengeful ways possible, and isnât that something weâve all wanted to do? At some point, just a little?
Encanto waa so good! Dang it idk why but surface pressure reminded me of thor for some reason tho xD
Oh that's a good comparison, too and I thought about that.
Thor's been responsible for Asgard's problems since the beginning. Why can't Odin send experts or other people to fix conflict in Asgard? It always goes on Thor to save everyone. Why? Because he can handle the weight.
Asgard's reputation as the golden realm is shaking? Thor, go to Midgard and return a worthy hero so you can be a perfect king!
Loki messes up? Thor, go to Midgard and bring him back!
Dark Elves are plotting to overthrow Asgard? Thor, go save your girlfriend and bring back the reality stone!
Muspelheim is causing trouble and Surtur is plotting to bring Ragnarok? Thor, go get the crown back!
Every problem was taken care of by Thor. So maybe Love and Thunder and even the Loki series would be a refreshing relief on Thor's side knowing there are others who can take the responsibility. Jane, Loki, Sylvie, even Valkyrie.
I think its significant for Thor character development that he`s lost his main symbol of masculinity - his hammer. Because for Thor`s initiation jorney is not relevant to find his Male Strength in typical masculinity traits that represented in phalliform hammer (phisical strength,violence, independence,restricted emotions). His journey is to find his powers not in a physical (material) space but in an inner space (that`s also very telling that his power is connected with nature). From the empathy to his people, to his brother, to his friends. From that perspective of view Taika`s Waititi Thor: Ragnarok is feminist movie that shows us new froms of social construction of gender in movies.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I set forth in a valiant effort â not necessarily to justify â but to chart and explain and ultimately disclose Lokiâs motivations in the movie Thor as they pertain to his downfall. I will attempt to outline just why he did what he did, what his reasoning was, and where things went wrong.