Hate is a serious problem, but it is not the kind of problem that can be seen; itâs the kind of a problem that a person has to think about and ask about. Because although it canât be seen hate turns out to be something. Hate turns out to be oneâs indifference towards or willful participation in violence, torture, control, obedience, or authority; and there are so many ways of saying it because although Hate is something a person does, it doesnât make a difference what someone calls their Hate. It matters that they think for themselves âlest they trivialize Hate. Sound familiar? Repent and sin no more. What the thinker calls corrupt, the church calls pride; they both mean persistence in Hate; the sin again. There are very specific errors a person makes that makes one hateful;
Traffick takes a person; where and when they donât want to go, or with a lie by any other name. Traffick isnât always physical, itâs also Traffick when someone uses a word to take possession of you. Words can traffic you into groups without you even realizing: âthe neighborhoodâ âour communityâ âUsâ are words that Traffick you. The word âweâ traffics you into a group item: the âusâ. And you may say to such a presumptious speaker, there is no us. We is used appropriately in the hate-free context of Equality. We are better as equals.
Authority presumes it may torture others. That which picks up a weapon is authority. That which makes hate speech is authority. A weapon is anything that is used to control or torture another, itâs not always something you can see, sometimes itâs words. âWe will hurt you!â Is explicit hate speech. âI am indifferent towards torture and violence,â is also hate speech.
Hate speech is voice in support of a hateful cause. Choosing to support control is no choice at all; thatâs like saying itâs okay to use your choice to take away someone elseâs, and it isnât. Before video games and computers control simply meant taking away someoneâs choice. Today, âcontrolâ is corrupt speech whenever people say things like, âBe in controlâ or âyouâve got to take control.â Classically, control meant choice is gone; and that was the classical argument against drug abuse was based on the now corrupted word that drugs control a person because you canât turn off the trip, you canât decide to stop being high while youâre high, because that choice is gone. Choice vs control is about preserving choice itself in the midst of control. However, this does broach the problem of pain: a person who is in pain is already being controlled. Hate speech is not the same thing as profanity, that some authority decides what profanity is and isnât, that is the hate.
Is it okay for someone else to speak on your behalf?
Is it okay to profile another human being without their knowledge?
Is it okay for you to pass judgement on another human being?
Whenever you answer a he said she said question, you take it upon yourself to speak for another, and you lend your voice to profile another, and with that profile you pass judgement on another: you take it upon yourself to decide what they said and what they meant; that's the control. When you speak for another you take away someone else's rite to speak for themselves, to represent themselves. You should say, go ask him, instead.
Debt, Criminal Records, Pornography, printing out someone elseâs internet search history, impersonation, doxing, he said she said, blackmail, hacking someone else's account, and the burn book; are all examples of per se. The hatred of per se, the control, has nothing to do with whether the profiles are true or not.
Per se is profiling, specifically, itâs a profile as a means of control, but by the time someone is being profiled, they are already being controlled: they may not even know that they are the unwitting subject of anotherâs profiling. Thatâs control.
Per se can be expressed in terms of authority. The hate speech, âItâs okay for me to profile this person,â has already assumed judgement, the profiling itself is the judgement. In other words, profiling a person is both traffick and authority. Per se can be expressed in terms of traffic with words. The hate speech, âThis person is the subject of my profiling; this person is my subject,â mistakes a human being for oneâs subject.
There were even laws against certain types of per se: sexual harassment, casing, and extortion; are instances of per se. Profiles such as debt end up being used to rationalize stealing and looting by any other name. Re possession and collateral, refer to the seizure of personal properties. The practice of lending (losing) amounts to stealing from borrowers when they cannot repay debts, and because the lender made a poor investment to begin with. When someone makes a bad choice, does that make it okay for them to then steal from their partners? Collateral is such a practice. Re possession is such a practice.
Itâs wrong to trap a person, either physically or with profiles.
Propaganda (fallacy: emotional appeal) when someone uses an emotional appeal to take away your choice itâs propaganda. For example, âBuy our insurance, or else youâll be sorry.â Bet against yourself much? Insurance companies have used fear to control drivers into betting against themselves. Fear is the emotional appeal. That you have no choice but to bet against yourself is the control.
If someone bet you your insurance premium that you would be in a horrific car accident this month, would you take that bet? You already took that bet when you paid your insurance premium.
Control with words. Itâs not only that someone means to control you, itâs that someone doesnât want you to think for yourself. Thereâs much wrong with obedience, the order itself is both per se and hate speech.
Ad hominem (ad hom) is when someone attacks the speaker instead of the argument, especially with an insult or name-calling. Many insults are ad hominem, but it doesnât even matter what they mean; itâs that no one should have anything hateful to say about you. The only time it isnât ad hominem is when someone needs to let you know youâre being hateful; when someone needs to call Hate what it is: despot, trafficker, authority, corrupt; itâs not that these words insult, itâs that someone needs to let you know youâre being hateful.
Two wrongs don't make a right.
Corrupt (Pride): persistence in Hate. Thatâs all it is, whether someone should know better or they get something for their hate makes no difference when they persist in hateful cause, and this is where words lose all meaning: âYour Safetyâ is hate speech whenever the state uses âYour Safetyâ to horn in on you, to persist in hateful cause. Therefore, âYour Safetyâ is what they call Their Hate.
Retail (the Corruption-again)
Retail (regime and retaliation, hate groups and revenge, law enforcement) retail is the mistake of thinking hate is good for anything; especially a currency, such as eye for an eye, or wages of sin. A sanctioned fight retails violence, itâs still a fight. It's still violence. Punishment and revenge is retail because someone is saying one bad turn deserves another. Hate is good for nothing. It takes despots to participate in hate groups and revenge. When blood is spilled in the name of Hate itâs called despotism: the blood of Jesus Christ is already spilled.
One can also explain sin & error in terms of authority and human traffick, that which Jesus Christ calls greater sin (Jon 19:11). To control another is to mistake another for your subject. Then it ceases to make a difference whether one calls it hate, sin, error, envy, authority or traffick. And this an especially empowering part of faith. People may argue with you, but they cannot argue with Jesus Christ, who loves you very much. Praise to the Son, praise to the Lord & Savior.
These are the Errors. Again, these are things you cannot see with your eyes but they are things people do. You have to make the time to ask if you yourself or anyone you know persists in a hateful cause. And there is a reason it concerns everyone. Love and Hate defy logic with an absolute argument: everyone; it takes everyone to oppose Hate and Hate by any other name if we are to know and cherish love, peace, mercy, belief and grace. Control is contrary to all of those things. Control is contrary to your faith.
You can lead a horse to water, but you canât make it drink. What can anyone do for someone caught up in Hate? Pray for them. Pray that they may cherish faith, but you cannot save them. Thereâs already a savior. Hate means a person isn't really thinking for themselves. Hate means a person hasn't really accepted others as equals in their heart. Cherish faith. Hate is a sinkhole and you need to stay out of it. May Jesus Christ himself tow the repentant ones from mire one day. The sin of man is pride. Repent and sin no more. Cherish faith,
Donât follow Paul, donât follow Moses, donât follow Plato. Follow the man who gives you faith. Follow Jesus Christ.
Dilemma is an abuse of a person thru an abuse of words, and while dilemma is hate speech it isnât always obvious. Asking a question and calling someone wrong no matter how they answer is an example of a dilemma; the loaded-question fallacy.
âWho are you? No, I didnât ask for your name. I said, WHO are you? You donât know WHO you are?â this speech is corrupt because it's Per Se, Ad Hominem, and Hate Speech all at once. Itâs got nothing to do with you, yet it calls it you ignorant. Itâs Hate speech. One could also say the question doesn't really matter because the speaker has an ulterior motive, in this case, it's more important for the speaker to call someone wrong for answering at all.
Another kind of dilemma is positing the binary either/or fallacy (itâs control), for example: âYouâre either in or your out. Youâre either with us or against us.â This speech also takes possession of you, itâs traffick with words, the either/or fallacy posits control. It tries to seem like a choice but itâs really an order; yes/no isnât really a choice when youâre ordered to answer the question.
âClick here to give us your choice. You must click here to submit the form.â           This speech is obedience by any other name.
Code, Irony, and Sarcasm: the Corrupt Meaning fallacy, the speaker means the opposite of what theyâre saying, or their words are code for something else, for example, âIâm not saying sheâs a bad cook, but she can stir the oatmeal.â Itâs corrupt speech because you canât take meaning in it, itâs a non sequitur. But whenever a person uses speech to mean the opposite or other than what they are actually saying: for instance, she IS a bad cook and only fit to stir the oatmeal; itâs irony or sarcasm. Theyâre trying to make it seem okay to tell a lie. And this is why Hate and Hate speech is about what someone does and does with their words.
Itâs a lie that anyone else can know how you really feel or what youâre thinking. Speakers often make claims of empathy, and even telepathy, to garner sympathy.
âYou think youâre so tough.â
You may tell such presumptuous speakers: You donât know how it feels to be me. You cannot read my mind.
Giving Voice to Assumption (dilemma)
When a speaker calls history a trash heap without actually having anything to say about history, without knowing any, it isnât irony or sarcasm because the speaker means to be dismissive of history. Anyone can be dismissive of history without actually knowing any history. The dilemma in this case is assumption, the speaker thinks itâs okay to give voice to his assumptions in a formal speech.
Calling the Audience Disruptive (Ad hom., Per Se)
Interestingly enough, interruptions arenât actually a thing, what the word does is call someone else disruptive. Itâs ad hom. Itâs loaded speech that someone can talk about nothing at all until someone else says something and then call them disruptive by saying, âYou interrupted me!" Critically, itâs claiming that there is such a thing as an interruption thatâs the fallacy; what is it? It is telling someone else when they can and cannot speak, itâs control again. Itâs not that someone did something new by speaking out of turn, itâs that anyone calls them a disruptive person thatâs the hate. Itâs corrupt-meaning again: âship hood atory ence ism ion ist ity ous; these words meant nothing at all. Especially ive; ive was really of again, except we already had of. The word offensive was really of fens of, it was a corrupt way of accusing someone of fencing, whether they had done anything wrong or not. As if they'd pulled a sword on you. Calling someone or something offensive was simply blame.
There are many prejudice assumptions and discriminations too numerous to cover. Remember that they are assumptions. Color is meaningless. Something written doesnât make it true. You have to think (face God, keep faith) for yourself, because Hate is attacking your faith. Your faith is under attack: belief, mercy, peace, love and grace are under attack.
Dilemma is a useful way of saying someone is being abusive with their words when you havenât yet figured out precisely how or why. It doesn't make a difference how someone chooses to lie. It doesnât really matter which kind of logical, argumentative, or informal fallacy someone makes when theyâre being hateful.
Dilemma is hate speech that isnât always obvious: loaded questions, control with words, code irony & sarcasm (corrupt meaning), assumption, labeling dissent as disruptive; dilemma is the lie itself.
Iâm not eager to name or list every type of dilemma, nor is it necessary.
Basically, do you follow Jesus Christ or do you follow Plato? Because you can't have both.
Plato offers you Justice & Plutocracy; it's hate and hate groups by any other name.
Jesus Christ offers you Faith & the Kingdom of Heaven. It means cherish faith: belief, mercy, peace, grace and love; and walk with him in everlasting peace.
You canât have both. And Iâm not getting hung up on a word here. You canât have justice and Peace anymore than you can serve two causes as diametrically opposed as the Kingdom of Heaven and Hades. I look out there and I see Plutocracy. Let's go back to God.
Lord & Savior Jesus Christ help me to cherish the gift of your faith this day and every other. -Amen
Punishment with words. Blame establishes culpability and punishment. The lie is that blame somehow helps, or that we should blame anyone. Fault, culpability; these are blame by any other name. People make mistakes, blame is the assumption that anyone should tax those mistakes. Blame is contrary to your faith because blame is contrary to your mercy.
A taboo is type of dilemma, it's something you shouldn't have anything to say anything about because it has nothing to do with you. One should have nothing to say about another's affairs; especially another's drinking, smoking and dancing. Unless you are their dance partner, smoking with them, or drinking with them, otherwise it has nothing to do with you. No one should have anything to say to you about your marriage, unless they are married to you. Taboo is why the state should have nothing to say about your marriage, but really, it's that there shouldn't be a state.
