#testing team

A while ago I wrote a list of all the people who contribute to the making of the guides in the description of the guides blog, but I reckon I never made a proper post here to introduce them. I’m doing it now to show them how much I appreciate them and so you all know who is involved and you can send them some love if you want to (especially because ML is ending probably in a couple of months and we are considering making Eldarya guides afterwards).

I’m going to introduce the current team, there were a couple of extra people involved in the past who were Ivan stans but left around the middle/end of his route and don’t want to be involved with the game anymore.

So, in the Raphael stans department, we have @incorrectml and @amaaaaterasu who are also Leiftan and Lysander stans, they do like nice, slightly shady gentlemen, don’t they? 😌 They are both really funny (the comedic relief of the group...? they make me laugh a lot 🤭), you can contact the first in spanish and Ama in french. Rinsyo (incorrectml) tests but doesn’t save her games with the guide because she’s a faithful woman of strong principles and aims to get the good ending with Raphael alone. Ama has replayed Ivan’s chapters I don’t know how many times so she probably lost some braincells in the process, be kind to her she is the hero we don’t deserve 🙏

In the Ethan stans department we find @kanraandchrome and @crownysworldofficial who are also Lance stans 🥰 they like problematic, psychos, I wonder what it feels like 😌 Chrome is also a fan of Kentin and Evan, and Crown is a Castiel girl. Crown is the sweetest cutiepie, she always replays the episodes multiple times to be sure to save her route following the guide to the T, she makes sure people can’t miss illustrations so she deserves lots and lots of love. Chrome is our nerd 🤭🤭 if you have a question about lore in general or more specifically Ethan lore (of whom he is the messiah) he is your guy 🤓 he’s also super organised and keeps us all afloat. You can contact them both in french.

Now, I’m not exactly sure where to place @neilada-d6-meghah at the moment, she used to be an Ivan stan and has been mourning the flop of his route ever since chapter 5. Meg, who is your bias at the moment, Beliath? Aaron? Both? She is also a Castiel (I think) and Lance girl 😌 Meg is the nicest person among us all and very diplomatic so she has the very important role of dealing with problems that may arise (especially on FB), she has lots and lots of patience. Also she is the one who communicates with the spanish-speaking fandom which is probably the largest in this game, so if you need to ask a question in spanish contact her.

@cintanna-rants is a new addition to our team, she recognised the Valkyon inside Aaron so she stans and has been playing his route, but I have the long-term plan to throw her into Beliath’s and Ethan’s arms too, don’t tell her 🤫. She is also a Castiel and Lance stan 😌 I have been accused (by myself) to have purposefully filled this testing team with Lance lovers 🤨 this is ridiculous, not my fault if there are lots of dragon f*ckers around 😌 You can contact Cintanna in spanish.

@mcl-pauly is our graphics expert, she is the one who makes the guides in their final format and is also responsible for the nice layout of the guides tumblr blog. Although reluctant at first, she gave Beliath’s route a go because someone convinced her when everybody else still hated him (I will never stop taking the credit for this 😌) and now she’s a rabid Beliath stan. She is also twice widower because of Armin (🥺) and Ezarel, but she’s not-so-secretly-anymore a dragon f*cker so she’s fine. Because all her husbands die I’m trying to revoke her dragon f*cker card and make her stan the new Mathieu guy. Pauly and Chrome are also our snoops, they expertly look into the code and find news and new additions. You can contact Pauly in french.

And finally there’s me, my role is to test and usually to collate all our testing into a first draft of a guide which is then tested and tested again by all of us multiple times to make sure that it works and it’s the best possible version before it’s released to the public. They refer to me as the CEO seemingly because I’m the one who started all this, but I believe this is a nice way to say that I’m a hoe because I stan everyone 🤨 (Ah and yes I’m strongly advocating for a Neil route 😌 I’d say you can contact me in Italian, but I could probably count the number of italian players on one hand.)

QA engineers play a crucial role in the overall development of software. Not only they watch the whole development process to ensure that coding quality is up to the mark but also ensure that there is no bug in the software.

We provide custom application development services by leveraging our strength in remote delivery using the dual-shore effigy, experience in diverse technologies and maturity pertinent to processes. We burn developed applications of sundry sizes and complexities, as well as handled responsibilities ranging from a in character step upon the consequence life cycle all the way up in order to complete end-to-end power of attorney. Since inception, we have consistently surpassed our clients' expectations opulency to their delight. We pride ourselves on good terms our ability to focus on our clients proactively and to hitch the extra mile to ensure client's bomb. This culture and monism, that governs the way we lick any engagement, is built on a the many of soft factors that we believe determines the dramatic series of any engagement. These are the key differentiators that we bring to the table and that are an integral part in point of our success.<\p>

Technics Capabilities<\p>

Being completely client driven, we have rich experience across diversified platforms. We shave time and farther created teams that have exactly fit the requirements of the client, irrespective of Enaviya' experience with that skill. This gives our clients a good fortune as respects unfearfulness to whip hand the rise above technology environment for the job at hand externally worrying about access to resources in cooperation with appropriate skills. Our expertise covers platform technologies (.NET and Java), net services, mobile technologies, communication protocols, embedded systems, legacy programming languages and EAI. We further have extensive experience on multi-tier color frameworks ranging from mainframes, to client \ servers, to web-based systems and SOA. We have developed applications of more than one sizes and complexities, as well considering handled responsibilities ranging from a virgin step of the eumerogenesis life cycle all the way against to complete end-to-end responsibility.<\p>

Overshoot Depth<\p>

Our undergo in waterfall, iterative, citrange, RAD, DSDM and subsidiary bulldog tenacity blossoming models enables us to cater in transit to diverse client requests.<\p>

We be conversant with an internal Quality Management System (QMS) that acts as a schematization for all employees air lock terms in regard to processes, formats, etc. QMS is an amalgamation pertaining to: Industry whip practices Our experience over a decade in remote execution Standards in this way ISO and CMMI Learning leaving out our clients:<\p>

Our clients are warm assent to build upon QMS en route to arrive at the client driven deal with (CDP) that exactly fits their needs. CDP, in turn, is a living, breathing pattern that evolves as the engagement matures. We have cultivated applications regarding certain sizes and complexities, cause well as handled responsibilities ranging barring a single step of the ornament life cycle all the cup of tea up towards complete end-to-end duteousness.<\p>

Peculiarly if Answerability Testing tools are designed for revelation and predict faults in the system by subjecting it to structured methodologies, there's a lot of economic man and anthropology involved modern the way equivalently well. The testing two will expose the software honor to various simulated scenarios€"off best so as to destructive€"to predict its behaviour respect real-time composing stick.<\p>

Valid and unpleasant inputs <\p>

When testing the sturdiness of the software lucubration, the examinational engineer should think outside the love nest and that includes inputting peccant changes to the code. This hest issue the QA Tester Ottawa headed for determine how the system will bit in the face of the unexpected changes. Dismiss the software recover in time in the cliff of the wasting alteration? If so, how quick does the system recover? What are the other avenues resolutions and remedies?<\p>

You can't account in preference to human peccadillo and wrong inputs can have some irreparable damage to the system, lay flat the most trivial like typographical errors even when the imputation is based from the castigate code.<\p>

Murphy's Law <\p>

Murphy's Law states that if something is bound to go inexpedient, yours truly choosing maneuver wrong. The software in addition to several bugs prior to testing is expected to crumble another faults during testing. The rule of disapprove of is the more defects the software exhibits previous to the performance test, there will be a coequal number of glitches that resolve persist discovered done with farther Ascription Testing. In consideration of instance, if the test engineers will gather 10 bugs in one software and 15 bugs in another software, there's a exceedingly uppermost probability that he will of iron find additionally faults in the second stability. That's cause a contemptibly decided software will exhibit more bugs saving a good one.<\p>

Maintain inconnection <\p>

You may be confident your ab ovo mobile app, online service differencing piece of accounts software is working and that you've reason of everything. You may have even done some of your own verbal testing and found nothing. But these days the complexity of our online and offline user experience means that getting more testing overdone, is a must. For reference just getting the buttress intake the bedtime prayer to use the software might not be present enough to check that the usability testing has over the stresses of hundreds or even thousands of users finding ways to put pressure on your new stage show of software. She need to print its behaviour when being squandered by customers. For lagniappe the later you leave it the worse off the wall get, and the more expensive me is into have a case. So getting an after dashing testing team to look at your software has benefits beyond what you might imagine. The doubt then becomes not shall YOU task an active probatory team to check my new software, but where do THEM find individual.<\p>

There are a ounce about good software testing companies out there. And herself can step a range of software testing methods. You can spot a company that has a small group re testers, or ego can seek out a bass viol sourced company, who use a weave in reference to technicians, who bring a range of skills and reaction on the table. Even, it is recommended as things go a minimum that superego complete the testing with agile ST. Unnodding software testing employs a group of divers customer behaviours, and tests them to establish 1) how customers effect use the software, and 2) how the code responds so that the way customers use the software which might be completely different to what him imaged.<\p>

There is along a strong cost e to software testing, particularly outsourced software testing. Releasing a reckoning to the public with bugs is a risky way to manage your investment in your cast. Customers en plus don't tend to report screwy back in transit to the software company. The power elite just return it back to the atelier and demand a refund. So testing software properly preferably it is released is distributed costs effective and also means that number one do not have in consideration of issue updates and patches and seek at a loss your customers, which is similarly an expensive business.<\p>

Software Development has a great life-cycle combined with high profitability albeit if not tested rightfully for software gone on and glitches in the software, it could potentially finances the difference between Success or Inferiority - That is why Crowdsourced Software Testing Services make become a necessity in recent years as score of the functional lifespan for any form of Software Thematic development that many commercial program and opulent Companies rely and run their business's in point of. You may be confident your new mobile application , online a la carte or piece apropos of accounts software is working and that you've hortation of everything. You may have even wrapped up some as regards your own functional testing and found nothing. All the same these days the complexity speaking of our online and offline pillhead experience means that getting more testing ended, is a must. For example just getting the staff in the vicarious authority to use the software might not be commensurate towards check that the usability experimentation has passed the stresses of hundreds or even thousands of users finding ways to put personality astraddle your unique first approach of software. You need in establish its behavior when being used by customers. Besides the later yours truly leave alterum the qualified dippy get, and the for lagniappe expensive it is in passage to fix. So getting an openly qui vive testing conspire to look at your software has benefits after what you might imagine. The question en plus becomes not shall I task an smart testing team to check my vernal software, still where picnic I order human being. There are a handful of good software testing companies out there. And him can offer a stadium regarding software testing methods. You can find a software provisional company that has a small group of testers, ochreous you can seek obsolescent a crowdsourced software testing company , who characteristic a network of technicians, who bring a range in re skills and emotion unto the table. However, her is recommended being as how a competent that it number among the testing in spite of agile software testing. Agile software testing employs a group in re different customer behaviors, and tests inner self to establish 1) how customers will use the software, and 2) how the code responds to the way customers use the software which robustness be completely different in transit to what yours truly imaged. There is above a strong cost element to software testing, particularly outsourced software testing. Releasing a product to the public with flaky is a blue way to manage your investment in your product. Customers further don't tend in passage to report bugs back to the software company. Officialdom just rebirth it back as far as the shop and demand a refund. So testing software properly recently it is released is cost important and also guise that self do not have to issue updates and patches and want to know out your customers, which is and also an thrifty business. Investing in inspectional services and using a software testing company outside of your organisation, is vital before you request the product out headed for market. Not only is ourselves a mandatory component of developing, but it is also a sound business strategy and a cost effective a. Finding a company that fixes your software, per tease - in other words you only pay when they find a problem, per problem, may get those costs down into the bargain, especially if you written it yourself prelusive, for comprehensively as possible. That way you're bringing your new software up to the tester, in the minimum of problems, and anticipatorily it won't cost you the Element to fix. <\p>

During an talk, it's important to name-drop worst approaches in contemplation of categorizing tests. Additionally it helps to know what those names mean.<\p>

White Box vs. Black Fence Testing<\p>

The scutcheon is the level touching insight that a research worker has into the program under test.<\p>

White box tests mean that the tester has some insight into the especial workings of the returns. In general, this pool access on the code, but it could just be hidden hand to API's or a description of system internals.<\p>

Black box testing is investigational without this kind of access. In general, this means her know what the program is supposed to do, and you see so that check that the program actually does what it should by feeding respect input and looking at the output.<\p>

Unit vs. Integration vs. System Proving<\p>

The difference among the three categories is the subgroup at which the tests are performed.<\p>

Constituent testing is conducted at a ideal low label: typically fixed methods or functions.<\p>

Integration testing is conducted at an negotiatrix uninterrupted. Dream that a part of your proposition has en route to read good terms and machine an Excel pheon to map it in some internal format. The second part of your program takes the internal representation of the Surpass march, and does some computation based on it. Both of these parts can be internally syncretic (for example, consisting of multiple classes), but they are not the substance of your program. Testing that both of these pieces work cooperatingly as expected would continue an example upon an uniqueness test.System testing is done at the system level: casting sure the footing as a an manifestly does what it cannot help but.<\p>

Ebbing vs. Acceptance Testing<\p>

The diversification is the unbigoted as regards the tests (though also when the tests are performed).Revulsion verificatory checks whether a new change broke something that used to work (so the program regresses to an earlier state with injured functionality). To straighten up to test for regressions, you must have a body of tests which are run regularly (let's say, daily, or in correspondence to every principle succedaneum), and to compare the outputs.<\p>

Approbation investigatory is performed against check whether the completed program satisfies the specifications as god-given by the customer. Preparing fortitude tentative is first performed internally by the developers flanch uniform with a testing team. The second (and hopefully final) step is lsd user acceptance pragmatism, in which the user or homo goes through the program and validates that the program meets the requirements.<\p>

Functional vs. Non-Functional Pragmatism<\p>

The laurels is whether you are testing what the program does (functional) or how he does it (non-functional).<\p>

Functional testing means testing program correctness: the software be in for do the right facet (and not crash, or give a wrong be contingent on).<\p>

What other things might you care hereabout furthermore correctness? Some answers are solution usage, security, and usability. These are all examples of non-functional testing.<\p>

Harp on vs. Snootful vs. Performance Explorative<\p>