Emptiness is Form, Form is Emptiness... What it appears to be is a limited version of what it truly is and what it appears in a solid form is not really solid and it's not really eternal and it's not really separate from anything either and it's much more than that. However, your conception of what it is, much greater, is also just a conception. And that's yet another limited form. It's the limited form of your conception of emptiness. The limited version, your limited understanding that comes from your limited conception of what you're terming emptiness. So, it means totality expresses through the apparently limited. But the apparently limited is an expression of totality. And therefore, you can see God in a grain of sand. But the grain of sand is also a grain of sand. It's also infinite, it's also infinity. Ra said "In each infinitesimal part of your self resides the One Infinite Creator in all of Its power.". But we're still making a distinction between an infinitesimal part of your self, meaning a little tiny part of yourself or many many little tiny parts of yourself; we're still saying that there's a distinction between many tiny little parts of and the Infinite Creator. That's limited perception; that gives us the duality of 'part and whole'. That limited perception, or that perception of 'part and whole', which you know, "In each infinitesimal part of your self resides the Infinite Creator in all of Its power."is a lovely philosophy, " but it still comes from dualistic consciousness of part and whole; little and big, limited and unlimited. You can say that we're talking about unity; but you can see how unity is based on belief and duality. To say that there's a part and a whole, but it's really one, is basically based on belief that your perception of part and whole and little and small are real. Even the perception or belief of part and whole are limited perceptions too. So to argue about unity... That's why Buddhism doesn't talk about unity. True Buddhist teaching doesn't talk about unity. Because it's simply a counter point distortion to the distorted perception or belief in separation or duality. You can't really have unity. Because you don't actually have separation. Duality is a fantasy. So, our conception of unity is also a fantasy. It's a complimentary to the previous fantasy of duality and separation; but both ultimately are empty of essential nature. That's why Buddha didn't talk about unity. And he didn't really describe enlightenment or nibban; other than saying it's the blowing out of the flame of grasping and ignorance. But it's surely non-dual, but it can't be called unity. It actually of course can not be described. That's why it's called absolute view. And that's why Ra says "Intelligent Infinity".
