i think that the vast majority of systems don't think of their plurality in political terms because they view it as being entirely personal. most people's engagement with the social position of their system only goes as far as interpersonal relationships: how to explain things to friends and loved ones, how to balance varying levels of interest in said friendships and relationships, maybe navigating being a system at work or school. obviously this kind of engagement is important, but it doesn't go far enough.
fighting the social stigma against plurality and the oppression that entails requires that we analyze our position in society and the reasons we occupy that position. even the forementioned view that plurality is only relevant to interpersonal relationships is due to the framing of psychiatry and society that neurodivergence is an individual problem that has to be handled by the neurodivergent person rather than neurodivergent people being a class of person that society must accomodate and account for.
ultimately those accomodations and any accessibility we need is what we as a group need to fight for. if we limit ourselves to seeing our plurality as only being a personal experience or set of circumstances we limit our ability to express ourselves and control our own lives.
-- julia










