#svitak

“anti-essay 2: introduction to dialectical materialism”

Even the best aesthetician is merely a kibitzer, an interpreter of something that needs no interpretation. Art, as a living creative process, does not need the crutch of objective interpretation. Objective interpretation is alien to its essence and to a deeper understanding of the world. At its base, art is communication between the naked personalities of a creator and an audience. This is why true artists have always been fascinated by the human being s concreteness and by the human being in love, to which everything, art included, can be sacrificed. What kind of interpretation, then, is authentic? None. Any. The meaning of art is simply that it speaks to us. What it tells us is not objective because what we perceive may be exactly the opposite of the author s objective meaning. And what remains in us is only what we are capable of grasping. The concrete human being was, is, and will remain the sovereign interpreter of its own authenticity, of its life, and of its art.

“In order to make anything a reality you have to dream about it first. In many ways, our audacity to imagine helps push the boundaries of possibility.”

Are Millennials the Most Distracted or Engaged Generation?