why do people keep insisting Nilo-Saharan is a thing ? they're like 'the evidence clearly supports it as a Family' and Rilly even goes as far as to ""demonstrate"" that the undeciphered Meroïtic is Nilosaharan... like, the major reconstructions and genetic organisation proposals, Bender's and Ehret's (also Dimmendal's ?), are so incredibly different they're mutually incompatible !!!! clear evidence indeed !!
but fair enough, that's probably just a sign of problems with the Historical Method /s















