You once mentioned having had only a three week period to create one of your languages (Sondiv I think? Yay/nay?). What about the process of creating that one was different than your other projects? Were there any shortcuts you took to get the most out of such a short timeframe?
Hereās the thing. When youāre creating a language, you can do it all in your headāand on the fly. Itās possible. The issue is rememberingĀ it all and getting it right once youāve settled on grammatical choices. To remember it itās best to write it down and write it down accurately. ThatāsĀ what takes time. Additionally, there are natural changes that occur to a conlanger once theyāve undertaken a bit of translation. With such an abbreviated timeline (and yes, it was Sondiv), I didnāt have time to translate stuff that wasnāt in the scriptāto get a feel for the language. The result is that the translations that appear in the first episode of Star-CrossedĀ are simply not as good as the translations that came later.
In that particular instance, I also enlisted my wife @thisallegra to help me with documentation and the lexicon, and I was grateful for it. The lexical entries she came up with were among the very best in the entire language. For my part, it is helpful to have moreĀ structure if you have less time. That is, if your verbs have a dozen forms, then you donāt have to worry so much about how to handle a given translation; you just go to the right cell in the paradigm. I had a large structure in Sondiv for deriving lexical items (to help Erin), and had a complete, rather than open-ended, case system (i.e. it was always clear exactly what case each argument should have).
Itās also not possible to change anything you might not like if youāve already sent off translationsāstuff you usually catch if you have the language to play around with, for a bit. For example, in Sondiv, whose intended word order is SVO, the prefix on the verb is copied as a suffix on the subject, and the suffix on the verb is copied as a prefix on the object. I thought it was a pretty clever way of doing things, but what I didnāt anticipate was that this was happening a lot (these are just dummy words);
Etc. The same vowel routinelyĀ occurred next to the same vowel when going from subject to verb and verb to object. Depending on what other words or structures were in the sentence this was naturally broken up sometimes, but not enough to prevent readings from being awkward. Had I spotted this early I likely would have changed the grammar, but since I didnāt, I ended up producing natural OVS word order. Basically, the tintinnabulation made a word order switch more attractive, with the object dragged out front and the subject deemphasizedāor dropped when understood (thereās no person agreement in this language). Itās similar to what I imagine happened with Hixkaryana, which has subject and object agreement as a prefix and suffix, respectively.
tl;dr Shorten the time, and the possibility for mistakes and inconsistencies increases.