Wait, what the fuck? I love me some Baldur's Gate, but isn't that game, like, 15 years old? There's a new expansion??? And people are arguing about it???
Since I have no stake in the game, I havenât been paying much attention to the drama. Apparently, the inclusion of a transgender character has ruffled some feathers, because, well, thereâs magic to change a personâs sex, so being transgender in the gameâs canon is very easily dealt withâas opposed to in real life, where transitioning costs thousands upon thousands of dollars and years of a trans personâs life.
Some folks are calling it immersion-breaking or lore-breaking, but Iâd like to know how the character is being written before I pass that sort of judgment, because, again, just because sex changing magic exists doesnât mean trans folk canât be born into the world. It just means trans folk can much more easily transition, and youâre probably way less likely to see any pre-transition trans folk.
So if theyâre writing the character as post-transition, they arenât really breaking any lore. The character used magic to transition. Simple as. Theyâre still trans.
If theyâre writing the character as pre-transition, they have to have a reason why the character hasnât used magic to change their sex. Could be that they arenât a magic-user. Could be that theyâre mysteriously immune to all spells. Could be that they had an adverse affect to the magic. There are reasons they could come up with, though I donât know if any of the ones I mentioned would be lore-breaking or go against canon, as I donât know the canon of the game.
TL;DR: I need more info, but for right now, Iâm firmly in the, âYâall are overreacting and not using yâallâs heads,â camp.