Counterfactual Thinking for P2 kasi wala sya sa faci dahil may sakit sya 🙄 #FomoNako
After my P2 exam, grabe, my brain would not shut up. Like literal replay mode siya. I kept thinking, “What if…?” over and over again.
What if I studied earlier? What if wala ko nag-procrastinate? What if I didn’t change my first answer? What if I was more focused that week?
Most of my thoughts were upward counterfactuals—imagining how it could have been better. And while it sounds productive, it lowkey hurts. Because the more I imagined the “better version,” the more disappointed I felt with the real one. Murag I was competing with a version of myself that doesn’t even exist.
At some point, I had to ask myself: why am I this affected? And I realized—it’s because I care. If I didn’t care about my grades, about improving, about proving something to myself, I wouldn’t be overthinking it this much. But caring also comes with pressure. And sometimes, that pressure turns into self-blame.
I noticed how harsh I can be with myself. Instead of saying, “Okay, you did what you could,” I say, “You could have done more.” Instead of acknowledging that I was tired or overwhelmed, I invalidate it. Murag bawal mapagod. Murag dapat always best version.
But counterfactual thinking also has a purpose. It shows me where I want to improve. It tells me, “Next time, start earlier.” “Next time, trust your preparation.” It becomes helpful when it turns into strategy instead of self-destruction. Because if I let it spiral, my frustration becomes my doom. I’ll keep replaying, keep blaming, keep comparing myself to a hypothetical perfect version. And that’s unfair.
The exam is done. What’s not done is who I get to be in the next one.















