Yeah no. First of all, Crystal was by far not a flop, and I really donāt know where youāre getting your data from. Second, Season III did not need to āsaveā the show at all, it just needed to follow the path traced by Munehisa Sakai, Yuji Kobayashi and Yukie Sako, but Chiaki Kon and Akira Takahashi instead decided to ruin it, with Kobayashi being the sole saving grace of the season. Third, Iām 99% sure youāve just watched the web-streaming version of Seasons I & II, ācause you wouldnāt be claiming that the show looked bad otherwise: I wonāt deny that episode 3, for example, was visually terrible when it first aired worldwide in 2014 (hell, I made endless fun of it), but the definitive version looks radically different and failing to acknowledge it is pure intellectual dishonesty. Youāve also got no excuse considering the fact that the improved version for the DVD release, and not the streaming one, was the one that was exported everywhere outside of Japan, so if youāve seen the show on TV you should know better than that. On the other hand Season III, which first aired on TV instead of on the net, did not receive any updates for the DVD release, so thereās no improvement in that regard; not counting the fact that any change to the animation they couldāve done wouldāve never been able to redeem the utterly horrible character design. On a personal preference level, Iāll agree that, on average, the old anime looks slightly better than Season III on the whole (not that itās a great compliment, lol) and some of the unfinished episodes of Season I, but itās light years away from the stunning visuals of the finished version of Season I and especially Season II. Not to count the fact that, among the five character designers who worked on both anime series so far, Yukie Sako was the only one who managed to create an artstyle that was at least a bit reminescent of Naoko Takeuchiās while giving it her own spin to it.I also donāt buy your claim that a lot of people were waiting for a new edition of the old anime, since A) its fans must obviously own it already, so theyād gain nothing out of a new edition, B) very few people own Blue-Ray players, so this is intended as a niche product from the start, C) the whole show has already been remastered for the DVD boxes from 2011 circa, so I really donāt know what else you could ask for, and D) high-definition can work for visually appealing stuff (as if a normal person could ever notice the difference from a TV screen, by the way), but it will only ruin low-quality products. Iām saying this from personal experience, because in 2013 I went to the cinema to see the Imax remaster of four different Disney Classics I already know very well: the result on Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin and The Lion King (three films featuring absolutely gorgeous animation) was stunning, while with The Little Mermaid (probably the most mediocre production ever of WDAS) its only effect was making its visual faults and difects all that more noticeable. If thatās what you want, go for it, ask for a remaster. But hey, why would you ask for it if youāve already got it? Never mind.In the end, the storyās lesson is always the same: stans of the old anime will *always* get not only what they want, but also a bunch of unnecessary stuff to pander to them. Fans of the manga, on the other side, will be left waiting years even for such a menial thing as a re-release of previously published artbooks. Artbooks which already exist but, note this, are now out of commerce, not like the DVD boxes of the old anime, which are available everywhere to buy. Next time Iām asked why Iām so annoyed by the arrogance of most stans of the old anime, Iāll gladly redirect them to this obnoxious ask of yours.